Victor Mignogna v. Funimation Productions, LLC, et al. (2019) - Vic's lawsuit against Funimation, VAs, and others, for over a million dollars.

They wouldn't go to jail even if they stabbed a bailiff in open court, because our justice system cares far more about dispensing with lolcows with an absolute minimum of engagement than it does about any of the piddly little rules that have accumulated over the last couple centuries.

They have to deal with crippling debt and possibly becoming homeless; I think that's enough of a punishment for their idiocy. Dequan and Bubba widening Ron's rectum 2 centimeters more than Monica's strap-on/bisexual bulls is merely a pipedream.
 
They have to deal with crippling debt and possibly becoming homeless; I think that's enough of a punishment for their idiocy. Dequan and Bubba widening Ron's rectum 2 centimeters more than Monica's strap-on/bisexual bulls is merely a pipedream.

Dequan and Bubba surely dodged a huge bullet, just sayin'.
 
This was Nick's response.
Ver archivo adjunto 790020
BTW, if you read that thread, this guy Cohen has to constantly emphasise how he "doesn't care about this kid lawyer" over and over and over.
-So report him- Nah, I don't care
-Ok, so talk to him- No, I have better things to do, I don't care
-So why are you involved- Because I don't think he's competent, but I totally don't care.
This is some highschool level faggotry to downplay his involvement.

He doesn't even quote what Nick said and provide specifics as to why it isn't quite simply saying what will naturally happen in the process of discovery. The fact that Nick probably called him a fucking idiot while saying it doesn't make it illegal.

He has met the stringent Super Lawyers selection criteria.

Now there's some random_text.txt material.
 
He doesn't even quote what Nick said and provide specifics as to why it isn't quite simply saying what will naturally happen in the process of discovery.
Not surprised given this same guy admitted to not knowing anything about the case yet calling for disbarment of Ty for one line. This is on the same level as those that think Vic will go to jail for his assault hugs. Ignorance and a enter button.
 
I think Super Lawyers is the equivalent of the National Society for High School Scholars. It's a way for people to pay their way to some sort of prestige they can point to in place of actual merit.

I have been far less than impressed with the "Super Lawyers" who have been involved in this case, and that includes those who are actually practicing in these cases, like Mark Zaid and Casey Erick. After seeing these people in action I would not only not be impressed by the title, but actually consider it a bad sign of what to expect.
 
I mean... it is literally called "Super Lawyer". I could come up with a ton of better names than that, since "super Lawyer" just shrieks "I am a pompous ass with more money and arrogance than talent and sense".

Would you rather have your chosen lawyer describe his or her background and experience; point out cases he or she has won; money their clients took home? Perhaps list articles they've published and cite appellate cases that discuss victories? Wouldn't it be easier if you could just read two words: SUPER LAWYER! Isn't being super easier to understand? Ignore what people say about it:

(1) Of all these sorts of promo publications, Super Lawyers is the biggest bunch of BULLSHIT I'm familiar with in my business.

(2) As a former chair of my state bar association’s Legal Ethics Committee, ... I found that the designation does not necessarily mean that the Super Lawyers are any better than other lawyers who do not have the designation. What I concluded is that the Super Lawyer designation is really more of what I call a “social” designation such as like being named a “Kentucky Colonel” or an “Admiral in the Nebraska Navy.”

(3) Lawyers nationwide are cheering that a court has finally mustered the courage to expose the well-funded corporations behind: “Super Lawyers” “Rising Stars” "Best Lawyers” “Superior Attorney” “Leading Lawyer” “Top-Rated Counsel” This month the New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising made it clear what they are. They are bogus.

(4) These are not reputable, the listings provide absolutely no value, and the insignias are completely meaningless. Disclaimer: By referring to these as “scams” I am not implying that they are doing anything illegal. I am not saying that they don’t deliver what they promise to their members. They do, and the product they deliver is a phony “award.” A phony “award” you have to pay for which comes in the form of a generic graphic, a meaningless plaque, and a misleading unverifiable claim that you are better than other lawyers.

(5) The Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising has received numerous grievances regarding attorney advertising of awards, honors, and accolades that compare a lawyer's services to other lawyers' services. Examples of such awards, honors, and accolades are: "Super Lawyers," "Rising Stars," Best Lawyers," "Superior Attorney," "Leading Lawyer," "Top-Rated Counsel," numerical ratings, and the like.
 
Have th efolks holding up this dude as "see practicing lawyers agree with us" actually looked into him? This dude is an honest to god lunatic. That fringe of loopy activist lawyers who think the government has no rights to do anything to anyone ever, all cops are murderers etc. They are loopier than the sovereign citizen nutcases.
 
Would you rather have your chosen lawyer describe his or her background and experience; point out cases he or she has won; money their clients took home? Perhaps list articles they've published and cite appellate cases that discuss victories? Wouldn't it be easier if you could just read two words: SUPER LAWYER! Isn't being super easier to understand? Ignore what people say about it:

(1) Of all these sorts of promo publications, Super Lawyers is the biggest bunch of BULLSHIT I'm familiar with in my business.

(2) As a former chair of my state bar association’s Legal Ethics Committee, ... I found that the designation does not necessarily mean that the Super Lawyers are any better than other lawyers who do not have the designation. What I concluded is that the Super Lawyer designation is really more of what I call a “social” designation such as like being named a “Kentucky Colonel” or an “Admiral in the Nebraska Navy.”

(3) Lawyers nationwide are cheering that a court has finally mustered the courage to expose the well-funded corporations behind: “Super Lawyers” “Rising Stars” "Best Lawyers” “Superior Attorney” “Leading Lawyer” “Top-Rated Counsel” This month the New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising made it clear what they are. They are bogus.

(4) These are not reputable, the listings provide absolutely no value, and the insignias are completely meaningless. Disclaimer: By referring to these as “scams” I am not implying that they are doing anything illegal. I am not saying that they don’t deliver what they promise to their members. They do, and the product they deliver is a phony “award.” A phony “award” you have to pay for which comes in the form of a generic graphic, a meaningless plaque, and a misleading unverifiable claim that you are better than other lawyers.

(5) The Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising has received numerous grievances regarding attorney advertising of awards, honors, and accolades that compare a lawyer's services to other lawyers' services. Examples of such awards, honors, and accolades are: "Super Lawyers," "Rising Stars," Best Lawyers," "Superior Attorney," "Leading Lawyer," "Top-Rated Counsel," numerical ratings, and the like.
How many "Superlawyers" do we know that do what point (5) requests them to do regarding clarification of those titles? I'll guess around none. The Bar regulators hate it, they know it's against code of conduct in putting out self-laudatory statements, and yet these guys get pissy when people correctly point out it's bullshit.

Have the folks holding up this dude as "see practicing lawyers agree with us" actually looked into him? This dude is an honest to god lunatic. That fringe of loopy activist lawyers who think the government has no rights to do anything to anyone ever, all cops are murderers etc. They are loopier than the sovereign citizen nutcases.
Remember, Jack Thompson was an attorney once. He passed that bar examination, and was a complete and utter lunatic. With the amount of tweeting this guy does, he comes off as unhinged to me. Frankly anyone who tweets that much who isn't a journo spouting news story after newss story is unhinged. He has more tweets per day and overall than fucking Spoony. This lawyer is beating out a drunk, washed out bum who larped as his dog on twitter and does nothing but tweet all day. HE BEATS HIM!
 
What are the odds that not only do they not provide any documents Monday, it turns out they haven't even started collecting them, if not outright destroyed some of them?
Low on the latter. Theyd almost certainly lose if they destroyed the messages they sent to cons, because the jury would be instructed to construe that destroyed evidence negatively. They're either going to provide the documents or contest it. They'd be retarded to try anything else.
 
Low on the latter. Theyd almost certainly lose if they destroyed the messages they sent to cons, because the jury would be instructed to construe that destroyed evidence negatively. They're either going to provide the documents or contest it. They'd be exceptional to try anything else.
Consider their record up to now.
 

I highly doubt that T. Greg Douchenozzle has the money fo' that, to begin with.

Would you rather have your chosen lawyer describe his or her background and experience; point out cases he or she has won; money their clients took home? Perhaps list articles they've published and cite appellate cases that discuss victories? Wouldn't it be easier if you could just read two words: SUPER LAWYER! Isn't being super easier to understand? Ignore what people say about it:

(1) Of all these sorts of promo publications, Super Lawyers is the biggest bunch of BULLSHIT I'm familiar with in my business.

(2) As a former chair of my state bar association’s Legal Ethics Committee, ... I found that the designation does not necessarily mean that the Super Lawyers are any better than other lawyers who do not have the designation. What I concluded is that the Super Lawyer designation is really more of what I call a “social” designation such as like being named a “Kentucky Colonel” or an “Admiral in the Nebraska Navy.”

(3) Lawyers nationwide are cheering that a court has finally mustered the courage to expose the well-funded corporations behind: “Super Lawyers” “Rising Stars” "Best Lawyers” “Superior Attorney” “Leading Lawyer” “Top-Rated Counsel” This month the New Jersey Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising made it clear what they are. They are bogus.

(4) These are not reputable, the listings provide absolutely no value, and the insignias are completely meaningless. Disclaimer: By referring to these as “scams” I am not implying that they are doing anything illegal. I am not saying that they don’t deliver what they promise to their members. They do, and the product they deliver is a phony “award.” A phony “award” you have to pay for which comes in the form of a generic graphic, a meaningless plaque, and a misleading unverifiable claim that you are better than other lawyers.

(5) The Supreme Court Committee on Attorney Advertising has received numerous grievances regarding attorney advertising of awards, honors, and accolades that compare a lawyer's services to other lawyers' services. Examples of such awards, honors, and accolades are: "Super Lawyers," "Rising Stars," Best Lawyers," "Superior Attorney," "Leading Lawyer," "Top-Rated Counsel," numerical ratings, and the like.
How many "Superlawyers" do we know that do what point (5) requests them to do regarding clarification of those titles? I'll guess around none. The Bar regulators hate it, they know it's against code of conduct in putting out self-laudatory statements, and yet these guys get pissy when people correctly point out it's bullshit.


Remember, Jack Thompson was an attorney once. He passed that bar examination, and was a complete and utter lunatic. With the amount of tweeting this guy does, he comes off as unhinged to me. Frankly anyone who tweets that much who isn't a journo spouting news story after newss story is unhinged. He has more tweets per day and overall than fucking Spoony. This lawyer is beating out a drunk, washed out bum who larped as his dog on twitter and does nothing but tweet all day. HE BEATS HIM!

Really good lawyer do not need to pound their chest with bullshit like "Super Lawyer", their competence and their cases speak for them.
Just in case somebody doesn't know the guy: Jack Thompson A truly fine example of a shyster.
 
"Super Lawyer" sounds like something a Lawyer would tell a client whose indefensible, leaving the client feeling smug and brave; It then buys him time to milk the client dry before coming up with a settlement with opposing council.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo