US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Wow, I didn't know Maduro was 6'3". I thought he was a commie manlet.
kim jong il made alot of people biased towards their percepticon of dictators didn't he?
Absolutely stupid that the subcontractor didn't have the best people on the most important job.
nigga probably saw "it's the guberment" and wanted to half ass because the money was guaranteed as it's usual for such things, honestly this is surprising to see.
never thought trump would assrape some halfassing faggot.
 
I like that name change. It not only sounds delightfully sinister, it’s more appropriate too. Nobody is doing a genuine invasion of the United States any decade soon, our operations for protecting the country are pretty much all abroad these days. So I say let it be WAR!
I think the Secretary of War needs to dress in a cartoonish villain getup. Ham it up a little.
 
So I had a car crash yesterday, and I missed basically the entire day’s worth of content.
@LiquidKid - I hope you're okay, fam.

Looks like gas has gone up 40 cents in my area and grocery prices are a few cents higher. Can't wait to see the articles shit how this is the end of America and we should just hand the keys to the jeets.
This is most likely the gas price increase that comes ahead of Labor Day every year. At my station of choice, gas went up 22 cents per gallon in less than 24 hours last week just in time for the holiday travelers doing their fill-ups before heading out of town.

Dems like to use gerrymandering to lock down states for themselves, though they'll lie about that like they do with voter ID laws. The real reason they don't like fair gerrymandering or voter ID is because it makes cheating harder.
A state in my area got a Dem-sponsored ballot initiative passed that moved redistricting to a third party panel with proponents claiming it would be more impartial and reduce gerrymandering because it would have equal numbers of Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. Of course the Dems were the only ones to complain when the panel did its first redistricting within all of the constraints it was given for the task.

It would take an Amendment to change that..... and neither side, for all their bluster.... would do it. Because it would affect them all, they only want to do it if there's some way (and there isn't) to only make it apply to the other side's guys.
Legality issues notwithstanding, age limits have fallen out of favor over the years. At a former job, I had access to the archive of union contracts and it was interesting to see an old clause that specified a mandatory retirement age eventually be changed to, "If permitted by law, retirement age is ...," and then be eliminated altogether. @TowinKarz is right, however, that those who have power are very reluctant to agree to anything that curtails their power in any sort of meaningful way.

It also doesn't help that the combination of age and performance can vary considerably. I know someone who was technically sharp in their career well into their 90s. On the flip side, I've seen younger professionals be so incompetent they needed to be put to pasture well before retirement age.

Turns out Americans want affordable houses, cheap gas, boosting the domestic workforce, keeping men out of women's sports, low crime, affordable groceries, toxic chemicals out of their kids food, and decreased inflation so their dollar goes further. Democrats champion none of these causes.

Not to say the GOP is nailing it nonstop, since the MAGA wing still had to drag them kicking and screaming, with RINOs eager to muddy the waters as much as possible
The working class immediately feels the crunch when paychecks have less purchasing power and disposable income. The 20-some percent rise in inflation under Biden was hard to miss in this regard. The Dems' focusing more on identity politics, gibs, and allowing illegal aliens unfettered access to the US hasn't helped them even if the GOP has its own issues and flaws inherent with any political party.

Will the Swamp get drained? If it gets drained of Neoliberal Satanists, that's good enough for me and all other normal people. If you mean "will the Swamp cease to exist altogether," that's simply not going to happen.
Expecting the swamp to be totally emptied and filled over never to exist again is unrealistic. Corruption will always exist to some extent; at best, it can be controlled in a manageable, minimal amount - especially since those who benefit form the corruption will fight efforts to eliminate it tooth and nail.

Learn to read the fine print kids!
Assuming the story is real, I bet this person didn't give the finer points of the employment contract any thought prior to signing it and is just now objecting over the alleged social media policy contained therein because they ran afoul of it and it was cited as the reason for dismissal. It's hard to have sympathy for anyone who waits until after a clause is invoked to raise issues with it. It's better to raise issues before signing anything - especially with clauses that are vaguely written or outright unreasonable.

Part of me thinks they told Trump about all the wishcasting and he just decided to do a little trolling.
I can easily see Trump envying the fact his detractors and the media fixate on the most trivial of things he says and does. I wouldn't put it past him to ham it up just to get them whipped into a needless frenzy because they take everything he says or does far too literally and seriously.

if the r/50501 project has nearly HALF of their traffic from Russia/China/India, who has been known to interfere with our elections, the numbers are a lot smaller than we might think.
From my POV, the 50501 stuff has largely fizzled from its initial frenzy. Apart from deep blue areas where the residents gather en masse to protest anything they feel strongly about, other 50501 protests appear to have fewer people each time other than the devoted die-hards. I also suspect the unions and other sponsors/supporters are doing their part to artificially prop up these allegedly "grass roots" protests to make them seem bigger and more important than they really are.
(Edited for spelling & clarity.)
 
Última edición:
me is stupid, I thought Indians breed like rabbits? how are they sub-replacement

They bred like rabbits, but they've been sub-replacement for the better part of a decade now. It's the same culprits as everywhere else, secularization, urbanization, and feminism combined with their "service revolution" not uplifting as many people out of poverty as industrial booms.
 
They bred like rabbits, but they've been sub-replacement for the better part of a decade now. It's the same culprits as everywhere else, secularization, urbanization, and feminism combined with their "service revolution" not uplifting as many people out of poverty as industrial booms.
in 100 years, the only people still around will be Mormons, Amish, and Hasidics. Pretty fucked (except for the Amish)
 
Yet another obese female judge ordering the mass import of third world rapists.

Remind me again why women are le based?
I would say they're your other half and complete you, retardation and all, but it's obvious you're an unironic faggot
I don't like that name change. That sounds sinister. At least with Department of Defense, the word choice implies that their main function is defense against adversary.
The DHS is the department of defence to anyone with three brain cells to rub together
the DOD IS the DOW
 
Última edición:
They bred like rabbits, but they've been sub-replacement for the better part of a decade now. It's the same culprits as everywhere else, secularization, urbanization, and feminism combined with their "service revolution" not uplifting as many people out of poverty as industrial booms.
And most of all, like escalators to the Chinese, the Indian's natural predator: trains
 
I don't like that name change. That sounds sinister. At least with Department of Defense, the word choice implies that their main function is defense against adversary.
The whole history isn't straightforward and it's not what you'd think. Originally there was a Secretary of War, which handled the army, then also a Secretary of the Navy. When aviation was first introduced, both branches had their own air forces, but then this was split out into a separate branch. Eventually it was decided that all of these would be under a single department, so the secretary who was in charge of the army changed titles from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Army, and the overarching department was the Department of Defense, headed by the Defense Secretary.

So I think that maybe they just changed the name then because Secretary of War had always been in charge of the army specifically, and this way everyone knew the new overarching position was a different thing. But everyone thinks it was a euphemistic change these days, so I don't oppose changing it, it's just at the time there was a good reason to come up with a different name. I wouldn't be surprised though if there's a few very patriotic people who do know military history who oppose the change, on the grounds of honoring the original position.
 
I hope you're okay, fam
Thanks. Randomly lost control of steering at like 30mph, car spun out and crashed through a concrete fence and went downhill into a brick wall. I am extremely sore, but I have no actual injuries, and no one was involved, there were no cars on the road, so outside of that one section of fence there wasn’t any other damage. I didn’t even get a ticket which is nice. The downside is now I need to find a new car, and the holiday weekend means I’m not getting the insurance payout until after all the deals end
 
The whole history isn't straightforward and it's not what you'd think. Originally there was a Secretary of War, which handled the army, then also a Secretary of the Navy. When aviation was first introduced, both branches had their own air forces, but then this was split out into a separate branch. Eventually it was decided that all of these would be under a single department, so the secretary who was in charge of the army changed titles from Secretary of War to Secretary of the Army, and the overarching department was the Department of Defense, headed by the Defense Secretary.

So I think that maybe they just changed the name then because Secretary of War had always been in charge of the army specifically, and this way everyone knew the new overarching position was a different thing. But everyone thinks it was a euphemistic change these days, so I don't oppose changing it, it's just at the time there was a good reason to come up with a different name. I wouldn't be surprised though if there's a few very patriotic people who do know military history who oppose the change, on the grounds of honoring the original position.
This is not even the correct history. If you’re going to give a lecture, at least give an accurate one.
 
This is not even the correct history. If you’re going to give a lecture, at least give an accurate one.
Which parts are wrong? The important part, that the Secretary of War handled the army and became Secretary of the Army at the same time the Defense Secretary position was created is correct.
 
Which parts are wrong? The important part, that the Secretary of War handled the army and became Secretary of the Army at the same time the Defense Secretary position was created is correct.
Well most of your post is just bad and confusing because you omit a lot of important details and to a layman who doesn’t know the history at all, he would be completely left in the dark still. But besides that, you seem to imply that the Secretary of War only handled the army, but that’s not really true. They were responsible for a lot of different things throughout history until new departments were made for them, like the Navy Department. They were overall more general purpose than what you imply, much like how the current DOD is very general purpose today.
 
I don't like that name change. That sounds sinister. At least with Department of Defense, the word choice implies that their main function is defense against adversary.

This kind of attitude is why the government is talking about unhoused persons, the economically disadvantaged, and every other stupid euphemism that's been invented over the last century. Your birthing person would be ashamed of you.
 
Well most of your post is just bad and confusing because you omit a lot of important details and to a layman who doesn’t know the history at all, he would be completely left in the dark still. But besides that, you seem to imply that the Secretary of War only handled the army, but that’s not really true. They were responsible for a lot of different things throughout history until new departments were made for them, like the Navy Department. They were overall more general purpose than what you imply, much like how the current DOD is very general purpose today.
You probably do know more about it than I do, but I know the Secretary of the Navy was created very early on in US history, and my understanding was that the position wasn't subordinate to the Secretary of War. I'm not implying they were autonomous to the point they could be feuding with each other like in Japan in WW2, but the I thought the Navy was very much its own thing. And like I said both departments had their own separate air forces until that branch was created.
 
He wears this exact combo of white shirt, black pants, MAGA hat while golfing all the time so that’s not really a indication of anything.
The opposite is true here too. If he wears the same outfit all the time, than they can take the same photo and use it for any day.

I'd shrug it off if it wasn't for JD's comments. We'll see next week for sure. I don't think he's dead, but I think there may be a health scare that they are worried about.
 
Get the Secretary some ominous music and some henchmen to for added effect.
Get his personal aides some of the DARPA exoskeleton tech, paint up a few of those new sig rifles in black, and you'd be 90% of the way there. Might even be a fun show unit, fit out with the latest undeployable fanciness and let them flex.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo