Socialists?

  • Iniciador del tema Iniciador del tema AF 802
  • Fecha de inicio Fecha de inicio
  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Yeah, the guy talking publicly about how he wants to torture and murder people in graphic detail is totally the one who isn't acting like an autistic weirdo. Whatever you say buddy
We went over this, child.

Socialists and communists aren't people.

I would never advocate doing such things to humans, animals, or even insects.
 
We went over this, child.

Socialists and communists aren't people.

I would never advocate doing such things to humans, animals, or even insects.
Like I said at the start, if some blue checkmark on Twitter said this about nazis I'm almost certain that you would be foaming at the mouth about how violent the left is and that they need to learn to be more civil. Anyone who hates socialists more than they hate fascists at the very least has fucked-up priorities. You've shown the world where your true sympathies lie.
 
Like I said at the start, if some blue checkmark on Twitter said this about nazis I'm almost certain that you would be foaming at the mouth about how violent the left is and that they need to learn to be more civil. Anyone who hates socialists more than they hate fascists at the very least has fucked-up priorities. You've shown the world where your true sympathies lie.
You certainly do make a lot of assumptions, and none of them are correct. It's like you sit around, dreaming up these arguments, and when it doesn't go your way- you write your own narrative.

Umbrage isn't an argument. When you can bring more to a discussion than some bitchy bored wine mom housewife from the suburbs, I'll be impressed.

Either that, or pull your dick out for me. I wanna see that.
 
I generally never like talking politics with anyone, but especially Americans. The tendencies to vocabulary terms to cut off conversations is annoying in my opinion. It doesn't help that certain terms in the American vernacular is different compared to other countries.

It took me a long time to realize that liberal in American politics is leftist where as in other countries, its referencing right wing policies in terms of liberal economic policies.

I tend to roll my eyes at people on both sides that expect the US citizen to take drastic political changes and even advocate political violence...but cannot be bothered to vote.

I can never figure out what an American will mean when they use political terms like socialism as it seems to cover everything from the Khmer Rouge to the government of Norway.

I personally just feel that there are many things I love about the US and there are things I think should be I improved. But talking about these things in a meaningful way is a pain in the ass.
 
Did you really copy the "post hog" meme from Chapo Trap House? At least be original with your insults. And I'm not assuming anything, I'm inferring. Someone doesn't sperg about the far-left as hard as you do without feeling threatened by them, and the only reason why that would be the case is if you're on the far end of the other side of the political spectrum.

You're trying that whole "anyone who makes fun of the gay is secretly scared of gays because they might be a gay"

Ladies and gentlemen, this is the bottom of the barrel of arguments, and BB has splinters under his fingernails.

No. Contrary to what might make you feel significant, I'm not 'scared'. In fact, I'd actually love it if you wheezing geldlings would get more violent.
 
Communism for the most part has benefited the world. Russia and China were both backwards, feudal hellholes before their revolutions. Within fifty years both had been transformed into modern, advanced societies. Under socialism Russia became the first country to put a man in space, and in China living standards improved dramatically. I genuinely don't get how someone could argue that those countries were in a better place before socialism than after it.

And when it comes to socialism in the modern era, I would much rather live in Cuba than in, say, Haiti or Guatemala. They may not have political freedom but the quality of life the people of Cuba enjoy is far higher than almost anywhere else in Central America and the Caribbean. Socialism can be taken too far (Pol Pot and the Khmer Rouge in particular), but in general it is enormously beneficial to all but the most privileged classes in society.

You do realize that China didn't become economically prosperous until after Mao died and Deng Xiaoping essentially implemented an authoritarian form of capitalism that used communist terminology and imagery, right?

As for the Soviet Union, the closest thing Communism has had to a major success story, they collapsed within a century and Russia was a economic mess because of the shit that happened as a direct result of Communist policies. Even though Russia has since made major steps to recovery, they still haven't fully recovered due to the horrors of the Bolsheviks and their successors.

Lenin was a bloodthirsty tyrant and Stalin simply took Lenin's work and expanded upon it.

The Romanovs were pathetic lolcows in their own right, but Russia was probably better off under them than Lenin or Stalin.

China and Vietnam are capitalist states with a communist veneer. The only fully dedicated communist states that are actually practicing communism are Cuba and North Korea.

North Korea is a shithole and is probably the one country more despised by the international community than Israel (at least Israel can feed its own people and doesn't have a dead guy as their de jure head of state)

Cuba is barely functional and their "quality of life" is grossly misrepresented and misunderstood. Yes, Cuba is a better place to live than Haiti, but that's like saying a .45 to the head is better than burning to death.

In terms of political ideology, the only thing worse than Marxist-Leninism or Maoism is the SJW pet ideology of Anarcho-Communism.

You're either stupid or a really bad troll, or both.
 
Nah, sorry but I'm not convinced. You don't have as much of a vicious hatred of someone as you do, to the point where you're willing to share your fantasies about murdering them with other people like some kind of school shooter, unless you feel like they're a threat of some kind.

I wouldn't call roaches or termites a 'threat', but I'd like them exterminated. It's pretty much the same with socialists, and the only thing that baffles me is how you keep applying the world "people" to them.


Why else do you think KKK rallies can now only attract nine people? Most of you fascists are pussies who are too scared to show up in public if there is even a possibility of violent resistance.

"You fascists"

I'm going to go out on a limb here and assume you're either:

a- completely incapable of fathoming the fact that someone might disagree with you who isn't that far right, so you just assume they're all "fashy"... because you don't interact with actual people, because you're an unlikable fuckwit (I know at least part of this is accurate)

b- you're still trying to write the narrative of an argument you rehearsed in the mirror or you wrote in Microsoft Word when the internet was out, because this one obviously isn't going the way you want.

KKK rallies only attract like 9 people because it's been a dying thing, hell- there's only like 5k of them across the country, and you pearl-clutching pussies are the ones that see some Channers shitposting and assume they're hiding under your beds at night.

The only massive hate groups that form mobs are on the left. And they tend to crumple as soon as anyone else shows up, too. And I hate to give Nazis credit for literally anything, but at least they can take a punch. Left wing weenies tend to drop like the wet sack of shit they are.

If the right wing saw you as a threat, you'd already have done a strangle-dangle under an old oak tree. Nope, I'm pretty sure the tactic right now is to let you keep digging the grave for your dying ideology until you either do yourself in, or someone comes along and gives you a quick peace.
 
Ah, I see you're taking the old "I didn't even read that stupid thing because it was stupid and gosh you are so stupid and I don't even wanna talk about it" approach. Are you sure you're not some bored old wine-mom? You certainly argue like one.

You've already begged me to go away.

I joined this forum like, 2 days ago. And I've already made you my bitch.

Give me 3 more days and I'll have you out chugging trouser-chowder on the streets and giving me 70%. I might even let you call me "daddy" and let you wear a wig.
 
Ah, I see you're taking the old "I didn't even read that stupid thing because it was stupid and gosh you are so stupid and I don't even wanna talk about it"

You've already begged me to go away.

I joined this forum like, 2 days ago. And I've already made you my bitch.

Give me 3 more days and I'll have you out chugging trouser-chowder on the streets and giving me 70%. I might even let you call me "daddy" and let you wear a wig.
You totally "made me your bitch" by acting like a retard, well done. You're a fucking joke
 
Última edición:

A telling response from a lowly troll who has never read a history book and unironically believes the dumb leftist myth of the Soviet Union winning World War II all by themselves. That is every bit as stupid as the old Republican myth of America winning the war all by themselves.

The Soviets could not have quickly beat the Nazis (if at all) if it weren't for the United States helping them out. The USA was keeping Fascist Italy and Imperial Japan busy, allowing the Soviets to focus more on fighting Germany while also keeping Germany tied up in North Africa, Italy, and later on in France and Belgium.

Stalin knew he could not take on the Axis Powers all at once which is why he signed a neutrality pact with Nazi Germany in 1939, and the Soviets did not enter the war until the summer of 1941 when the Wehrmacht invaded the Soviet Union and forced the USSR's hand. The USA joined in the war later that year.

You go on about how great Marx and Engels were, but I bet you've never read any of their books.

Hell, if you are a true and honest commie and not some shitposter troll, then you're likely a dumbass SJW Anarcho-Communist college kid who unironically wears Che Guevara shirts and thinks anything slightly to the right of Lenin is fascist.

The only book you ever read was Harry Potter. Maybe you should read Animal Farm and 1984 instead.

(PROTIP: Neither of those books are instruction manuals and George Orwell was a Social Democrat, not a commie)
 
A telling response from a lowly troll who has never read a history book and unironically believes the dumb leftist myth of the Soviet Union winning World War II all by themselves.

In all fairness, if we'd have aimed machine guns at every civilian we could grab up and told them to charge in massed hordes, this would probably be planet USA.

I don't know if it's a myth or not, but I think the biggest mistake the US made during WW2 was to stop moving east. Supposedly, the Soviets had snagged up a couple thousand or more allied personnel as hostages to prevent this sort of thing.

But, I think our little troll has taken enough of a beating. He's already doing the internet equivalent of laying on the floor and kicking his feet and screaming. Let him lay there and get it out of his system.

He'll either grow out of it or wander off into the shed with his stepdad's revolver. All of this hopefully before he finds some hobbled invalid female with a functional reproductive system and rapes his bastard into her.
 
Honestly? All of this is why I'm always harping on about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. If you oppose Socialism then you should probably consider the outcome of the humiliation and destruction of one of if not the highest profile Socialists on the planet. Her defeat would cripple the Socialist movement while dealing a heavy blow to the overall sjw movement, and while it won't be the end of sjws, they're going to notice that bitch getting her asshole reamed and thrown out of office.

She also represents a significant hurdle in the path to adoption of nuclear energy. Do you actually think that the environment is worth saving? Get rid of this little huckster.

The bonus? Everyone already hates her, so a bunch of shitposting might actually do the trick. Imagine being so weak politically that internet shitposting is a serious threat to your career.
 
Honestly? All of this is why I'm always harping on about Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. If you oppose Socialism then you should probably consider the outcome of the humiliation and destruction of one of if not the highest profile Socialists on the planet...

I'm still waiting to see how she pans out. A part of me wants some of her ideas to actually take off (in places I don't live), because the complete catastrophic clusterfuck that would follow... oh, boy. Oh, Ho- Lee- Fuck. I want to say it'd be absolutely fucking hilarious, but there's going to be enough misery with it that I'm pretty sure I'll end up feeling shit-awful for those folks and throw a few cans into a food drive bin.

I mean, it's pretty much confirmed that she was planted and propped up. She's not a politician, but rather someone hired to be the face of an activist group and work as a politician- we're just lucky that when she's on script she sounds fucking stupid (because she works for stupid people), and when she's off script she demonstrates the poverty of the English language because we don't have a specific way to describe that level of fucking stupid. The scary part is- that idea's going to set off light bulbs in some peoples' heads.

Wait until the right wing does it.

Better hope they're close to center.
 
Says the guy that started spamming the report button and shitposting on my profile when he got embarassed elsewhere yesterday.

Good game faggot. Still not taking off the trainer bra until we're under the covers.
You think a mod would delete both of our posts because I reported? It was the OP of the thread.

I'm not even disagreeing with you in principle ITT but you are unbearably autistic and a smug cunt, as evidenced by your ridiculous conspiracy theory about the post deletion and the fact that you thought my last post wasn't calling both of you retarded.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo