US Selective Service System wants to wargame the draft - Selective Service System plans a computer simulation to test how it would carry out a national mobilization of American manpower

Selective Service System wants to wargame the draft Article | Archive

By Michael Peck- Jul 24, 2026, 10:16 AM
1784910454618.png

Fearing that its new plans for the U.S. military draft pool won’t work, the Selective Service System wants to create a computer simulation to test scenarios for its national mobilization.

The “Readiness Simulation” project comes as the U.S. government is about to change its draft registration system.

Since 1940, men within a designated age range have been required to register with the Selective Service. But under a proposed rule, men aged 18 to 26 will be automatically registered starting Dec. 19, 2026. The Selective Service System will work off data contained in other federal databases.

Questions remain about how prepared the Selective Service System is to handle the change.

“SSS currently relies on manual analysis, legacy modeling approaches, outdated assumptions, and historical datasets that do not fully reflect modern demographics, communications channels, throughput constraints, or operational readiness conditions,” warned the agency in a Request for Quote for the Readiness Simulation tool.

The deadline for vendors to propose their simulation models is Aug. 14.

The computer simulation will explore multiple areas. These include evaluating staffing and resource requirements, comparing mobilization and police scenarios and assessing the operational impact of surge conditions. In addition, the system will “identify throughput risks, delays, and bottlenecks” and support executive planning and reporting obligations.

The goal is a simulation system that “models the full end-to-end SSS mobilization pipeline, supports configurable scenarios, and provides decision-support analytics necessary for leadership, planners, and operators.”

Scenarios will encompass draft registration, selection, notification, delivery and classification. They will also cover the Alternative Service Program, which includes various forms of community service as well as conscientious objectors.

Computer models will “represent MEPS [Military Entrance Processing Stations] throughput, no-shows, medical disqualification rates, claims processing, and ASP diversion,” according to the Request for Quote.

Contractors must be prepared to run the Readiness Simulation while “recognizing that legacy SSS draft data may be outdated or unreliable,” the agency said.

A draft registration system based on data compiled by — and accessed from — other federal agencies is likely to raise privacy concerns.

The computer simulation “shall operate within an SSS-designated cloud environment, use anonymized aggregate data, and support complete Government ownership and sustainment,” the agency said.

The simulation must also comply with multiple privacy regulations.
 
Lmfao do you know how wild it is to see this quote blasted all over the front page, dude why would you say that!!!!! Fkn lolcow behavior

I might mock him less if he cheated the old fashioned way. You missed when he blamed his meds on it like the faggot from Sopranos.
 
The first reason is simple. Jew sperging. The USA is not involved in the middle east because of Israel.
Categorically false.
I have no understanding about what is going on, unlike based enlightened Candance Owens enjoyers.
No you're just a man who doesn't actually understand that the PNAC is a laundered Yinon Plan, for starters. And if you don't understand that, you're really not someone who should be discussing such matters.
Presented with no further commentary.
greaterisraelIraq1 - Copy.png

- From "A Strategy For Israel In The Nineteen Eighties", Obed Yinon.
I forgot to post this, but in case anyone's too lazy to click the link, these five images are the most relevant part. [image limit hit on this post, click the name in the top left to go view the Yinon Plan in full via images, on the original post this quote links to]
Click on my name on the following post to go to the related information:
What you need, if you are not yourself jewish, is to actually, fully watch the following:
Then, go here:
Remember, everyone present:
rabbiquote1 - Copy.jpgIMG_8999 - Copy.jpegGEtSnT9XcAA9-31 - Copy.jpgGY6OvziW0AAEwYd - Copy.jpgGreaterIsraelProjectGuy - Copy.pngjews again - Copy.png
GEUbnrSXUAA1noD - Copy.jpg
From the signing of the Hart-Cellar Act, to the invention of Marxism, to various plagues of our philosophy and culture, all inevitably trace backwards to one consistent source.

They want you to focus on the symptoms and not the cause.

I mean of all the stupid things, the reason you people are against "jewsperging" is because you're still shabbos goyim who don't really understand the people you're allied with, how they view you (non-jew, so, non-human cattle), and how they absolutely do not care about mimicry when it suits them, as unlike you (and importantly just like muslims) they have no moral issues with deception of those outside of their group, no matter how long-term.

There's a concept in argumentation of concision, that brevity is the soul of wit. There's another property to be reminded of too, that of Occam's Razor. It's not perfect, even if it is massively improved by dint of not being a misconception of ethics over Hanlon's erroneously titled 'Razor', but it is apt.

Allies and supporters of jewish ethnic concern, have to constantly patch over different obviously jewish interests with convoluted, nonsensical, and most importantly, observably false logical leaps. The fact that Trump has repeatedly been told off by his master Benjamin is enough to show that your role reversal of America as the one in charge whose interests any of this shit is serving, prima facie laughable.

As I said below:
Yes, these people somehow don't understand "get jews out of our political systems and return muslims en masse to countries now not torn apart by Israeli interest" as a simple concept.

The "us" who do not view them as human are not a coalition of allied political stances. I guarantee for instance, you and I @bread n circuses do not agree on various domestic issues, but that does not matter. At a baseline level, we are not supportive of a deracinating, dispossessing, imperial power that serves jews and their immediate best friends at the top.

The "they" who are not human here, support that.

This has very little, even, to do with jews. They simply are the ethnic interest underpinning most of the raison detre this shit has for beginning, and everything else that is also a beneficiary is simply entangled with the post-WW2 "Liberal rules-based Order".

It's mental illness to keep responding, to that, with accusations of intolerance when this is the very same reason these people and their allies treat us and all naysayers as inhuman and allied in a united front. Not because we are, but, because we as a sum group are non compatible with their sum groups' interest, at the group level.

It's all very warped if you're coming from the other side of this though, which is presumably why conservatives do not question why they're under the same banner as progressives, and jews, and massive corporate interests, and the military industrial complex, and on and on, right now. If you stop to even consider the problems with their coalition it dissolves.
- you and yours, all among them who are not jewish are welcome to just simply admit you were wrong with no hard feelings whatsoever as all of us in the West were once like you in that regard, suffer an immense misunderstanding of the current political situation.

I have, as always, plenty of educational material and prior posts I've made to assist in your education on the matter so you don't look like, no offense, kike-owned cattle (reminder, goy means cattle, and you lot definitely are sabbath-cattle) the next time you wish to speak on such issues.
 
Última edición:
>Sees the thread title
>Knowing A&N expects a lot of spastic Israel sperging
>Is not disappointed

ABVKDZO4WVOCJX6QINQC7GQV.webp

Real talk though, this is just another one of those readiness exercises the Pentagon has to come up with to justify their existence, and as others have pointed out it will probably be a shitshow given how no ones tried an exercise like this in decades.
 
I'm actually Cornish. I want the Anglos and the Scots to get the Palestine treatment too. Us chosen people need to stick together.
Probably some filthy smackhead from a shithole like Redruth or Plymouth. Unless you're yankee diaspora, in which case I hope you get better soon and wish you a speedy recovery.
 
spastic Israel sperging
I'm so sorry to hear about your inability to read anything relating to Israel or jews.

It's a very peculiar psychological issue but I'm sure if you try, your jew-related dyslexia might clear up some day.

I assume every one of you who has no arguments, other than dismissive hand-waving, simply cannot read what has been said. It's a tragedy, really. I wish each and every one of you a speedy recovery from your severe psychological and intellectual deficiency.
 
The outcome of this can be predicted: the draft will be a massive logistical burden and there will be shortcomings. Both the America and the American military are very different from the last time there was conscription for the United States Armed Forces.
With all forces trending towards a smaller, more professionalised force, the US cannot forever keep up being a huge job organisation when it's actual fighting force can only be so large before it causes significant supply issues. Even the soviets recognised this in the 1970s and planned by the mid 1990s to cut down on their mostly conscript service with a much, much smaller force. Also this is not even accounting for the fact of scaling up the size of the officer corps, which you will then find yourself running into the same issue China had during their conflict with Vietnam in 1979 (this is besides the entire removing officer ranks which was in reality culling them down to 5 positions total). You cannot scale up an officer corps by even 2x to accommodate for conscription without making the NCO and CO rank quality completely shitting the bed and risking losing a shitload of men in combat because all your officers are even more retarded than before since you needed to rush them through to fill in those positions.
Patience for US government fuckery is at an all time low and no matter who is president, the people are all fucking exhausted from getting railroaded from every possible angle and both sides of the political spectrum would be happy to re-water the tree of liberty if you start sending more sons and daughters into the meat grinder for another useless forever war. It's the reason why this whole comflict has been exclusively air missions and nothing else.
Top military brass themselves already hate the sandbox and do not want to get dragged into it any longer. Although certain people are obviously pushing for it still and the military industrial complex needs to keep using up its stockpiles so they can keep up production. If a war is to happen with a near-peer opponent (China most likely), the US military is going to suffer issues far larger than just not getting enough manpower to actually fight in the war.

Also can A&N niggers not resort to Israel and sexual insults for 2 posts? pretty pls.
 
With all forces trending towards a smaller, more professionalised force, the US cannot forever keep up being a huge job organisation when it's actual fighting force can only be so large before it causes significant supply issues. Even the soviets recognised this in the 1970s and planned by the mid 1990s to cut down on their mostly conscript service with a much, much smaller force. Also this is not even accounting for the fact of scaling up the size of the officer corps, which you will then find yourself running into the same issue China had during their conflict with Vietnam in 1979 (this is besides the entire removing officer ranks which was in reality culling them down to 5 positions total). You cannot scale up an officer corps by even 2x to accommodate for conscription without making the NCO and CO rank quality completely shitting the bed and risking losing a shitload of men in combat because all your officers are even more retarded than before since you needed to rush them through to fill in those positions.
Skill issue. Smart conscription systems incorporate the training of new NCOs and COs by picking those who volunteer for the roles and testing them to see if they are actually fit for the duty. Also, it helps ensure that you have officers who actually do understand what being a grunt is because they went thru the same basic training as everyone else before volunteering for officer duty. Those same volunteers then can be used to command the next batch of conscripts so they get some experience in telling people what to do.
 
Skill issue. Smart conscription systems incorporate the training of new NCOs and COs by picking those who volunteer for the roles and testing them to see if they are actually fit for the duty. Also, it helps ensure that you have officers who actually do understand what being a grunt is because they went thru the same basic training as everyone else before volunteering for officer duty. Those same volunteers then can be used to command the next batch of conscripts so they get some experience in telling people what to do.
We are working off the assumption that this has been entirely laid out bare with full transparency for a hypothetical conscription being reintroduced. We would have to see what an actual system would look like in terms of training of whether they keep the current system or if it is tinkered due to xyz reasons, if it is from congress meddling, most people being too fat and retarded to serve etc. I am 50/50 on it being a smart conscription system.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo