“Save the big booty Latinas” has a hell of a lot less geopolitical consequences than a map only possible with WW3 and genocide.
and yet neither are policy
first article is retarded and can't get simple things right
Israel’s objectives can further be summarised by its national anthem, which still states: “This West Bank is ours and so is the other one [referring to the East Bank in Jordan].”
As long as in the heart, within,
The Jewish soul yearns,
And towards the ends of the east,
[The Jewish] eye gazes toward Zion,
Our hope is not yet lost,
The hope of two thousand years,
𝄆 To be a free nation in our own land,
The land of Zion and Jerusalem. 𝄇
In order to reflect the true nature of Israel’s expansionist visions, it is perhaps helpful to demonstrate the beliefs of an Israeli military leader when he was asked where Israel’s borders begin and end, he replied, “Israel’s borders end wherever our tanks and our soldiers’ footsteps reach.”
this article makes up so many quotes that when I google them the only result that shows up is this article
not reliable
these both discuss the Yinon plan which doesn't even talk about annexing Arab states, it talks about creating arab fracture states to help Israel
they use this map as a guide:
alleging this is what Israel wants to capture
while also using this map:
to prove that Israel wants to split these lands into small states without putting together the idea that if these arab small states exist, they cannot be occupied by Israel to form Greater Israel
they keep citing the Yinon plan as proof of Greater Israel but the Yinon plan never mentions greater Israel
funny that that lying faggot Israel Shahak keeps showing up but even he doesn't talk about occupation:
The following essay represents, in my opinion, the accurate and detailed plan of the present Zionist regime (of Sharon and Eitan) for the Middle East which is based on the division of the whole area into small states, and the dissolution of all the existing Arab states. I will comment on the military aspect of this plan in a concluding note. Here I want to draw the attention of the readers to several important points:
1. The idea that all the Arab states should be broken down, by Israel, into small units, occurs again and again in Israeli strategic thinking. For example, Ze’ev Schiff, the military correspondent of Ha’aretz (and probably the most knowledgeable in Israel, on this topic) writes about the “best” that can happen for Israeli interests in Iraq: “The dissolution of Iraq into a Shi’ite state, a Sunni state and the separation of the Kurdish part” (Ha’aretz 6/2/1982). Actually, this aspect of the plan is very old.
and he has to end with the cope that it was "explained orally"
In order to ensure this, the plan, as explained orally, calls for the establishment of Israeli garrisons in focal places between the mini states, equipped with the necessary mobile destructive forces. In fact, we have seen something like this in Haddadland and we will almost certainly soon see the first example of this system functioning either in South Lebanon or in all Lebanon.
such a thing would be impossible.
Even the Arab friendly Shahak has to call you guys out for being retarded:
The Arab World has shown itself so far quite incapable of a detailed and rational analysis of Israeli-Jewish society, and the Palestinians have been, on the average, no better than the rest. In such a situation, even those who are shouting about the dangers of Israeli expansionism (which are real enough) are doing this not because of factual and detailed knowledge, but because of belief in myth. A good example is the very persistent belief in the non-existent writing on the wall of the Knesset of the Biblical verse about the Nile and the Euphrates. Another example is the persistent, and completely false declarations, which were made by some of the most important Arab leaders, that the two blue stripes of the Israeli flag symbolize the Nile and the Euphrates, while in fact they are taken from the stripes of the Jewish praying shawl (Talit).
A government that is truly secular would not make claims of territorial significance based on biblical account
good thing there's tons of archeological evidence that shows Jews were living there as well as the name of the reign literally being known as "Judea and Samaria" for thousands of years
You're either admitting you don't understand temporary concessions or you're absolutely dogshit at pretending to be retarded.
this is severe cope, the egyptian army is built up in the sinai right now and the Israeli government spent 2018-2023 allowing qatar to give money to Hamas explicitly so gaza wouldn't collapse and force Israel to intervene. The Israeli military props up the status in Area A and Israelis are not allowed to enter it
been the case since Oslo but somehow it's "temporary" across multiple disagreeing governments
you mean the Israeli supported Christians that Hebzollah/Palestinians killed and threaten to this day? They somehow don't count.
