🌟 Internet Famous Karl Jobst / karljobst / FAQ_GOD / simthreat / approachhernow.com - Albino autist, Spergy speed runner, Pickup predator and Bitch of Mitchell

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Jobst v. Mitchell 0:26-cv-60997 — District Court, S.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    0:26-cv-60997
  • Court
    District Court, S.D. Florida
  • Filed
    7 de Abr, 2026
  • Nature of Suit
    360 P.I.: Other
  • Cause
    28:1332 Diversity
  • Jurisdiction
    Diversity
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    18 de Jun, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
William James Mitchell, Karl Jobst

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 27)

# Date Description Filing
24 18 de Jun, 2026 First REPLY in Support of Motion re 17 Defendant's MOTION for Bill of Costs (Security for Costs). filed by William James Mitchell. (Mitchell, Michele) (Entered: 06/19/2026) PDF
23 18 de Jun, 2026 First REPLY in Support of Motion re 16 MOTION to Dismiss 8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal . filed by William James Mitchell. (Mitchell, Michele) (Entered: 06/19/2026) PDF
22 16 de Jun, 2026 First STIPULATED MOTION for Substitution of Counsel. Substituting Michele T. Mitchell for Michele T. Mitchell, Esq. at JAMBP&H by William James Mitchell. Responses due by 7/1/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mitchell, Michele) (Entered: 06/17/2026) 1 2
21 15 de Jun, 2026 DECLARATION OF KARL JOBST IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS re 20 Response in Opposition to Motion by Karl Jobst (ksr) (Entered: 06/16/2026) PDF
20 15 de Jun, 2026 RESPONSE in Opposition re 17 Defendant's MOTION for Bill of Costs (Security for Costs) filed by Karl Jobst. Replies due by 6/23/2026. (ksr) (Entered: 06/16/2026) PDF
Also there'd be two defendants in that suit, one of which definitely has the cash, the drive and the autism to really fry Jirard's ass if he tries that stunt. As felted as Karl is, attempting to launch that lawsuit to bully him would still be suicide because there's nothing stopping the jeet from jumping in to throw his weight around.
Agreed - reading the completionist thread there’s been some pretty dumb revisionism at times. Some people seem to leap at the chance to write it off as some innocent mistakes. Jobst spiraling down a felting whirlpool of his own making doesn’t mean Jirard wasnt, at the very least, almost surely doing some “light fraud” at minimum
 
I know this isn't how the law works, but it would be funny if the Completionist could sue Karl Lobst following the exact same arguments Karl makes against Billy, because under those Lobst would be guilty of defaming the Completionist.
  • (1) Publication: Lobst's videos
  • (2) Falsity: No charity funds were embezzled
  • (3) Fault: Applying Lobst's arguments, the Completionist is a private person for the purposes of defamation, so Karl must only have acted negligibly, which he did (AccountingAndYouTube tried to correct Lobst but he continued his defamation)
  • (4) Defamation per se: Again following Lobst's logic, the fact that he accused the Completionist of charity fraud alone qualifies as defamation

Honestly Lobst should have listed to that Jeet Mutahar and shut the fuck up about Jirard.

Muta basically said on on one of his videos that he had no idea why Lobst would be making statements about Jirard when he has absolutely no expertise in any of that.

Lobst’s felting is gonna be worse than Dickers, and I’m here for it.
 
The older I get, the more I think caring about cheating in regards to high scores is really gay
I think Jobst’s videos about cheating in video games aren’t terrible. If he just stuck to that instead of aloging then he probably wouldn’t have gotten sued.

I will say his recent one about the RE speedrunner cheating was lazy bullshit. If you want to see Correy with 2 Rs get felted then check out the original source content. As I’m sure his wife tells him constantly, Lobst adds nothing of value.
 
I think Jobst’s videos about cheating in video games aren’t terrible. If he just stuck to that instead of aloging then he probably wouldn’t have gotten sued.

I will say his recent one about the RE speedrunner cheating was lazy bullshit. If you want to see Correy with 2 Rs get felted then check out the original source content. As I’m sure his wife tells him constantly, Lobst adds nothing of value.
Jobst used to be good at collecting and presenting information even outside of his specific niche. Sure it was a bit regurgatory, but it was presentable for both normies and people actually invested. He used to be clear and concise with both the story and the technical aspects.

However, being clear and concise now will fuck him over because he played sneaky fuck fuck games. He's going to show a great decline in it now because it'll induce psychological stress to try and compete in the space he used to dominate. There is only one solution, the final solution. Total. Slop. Blitz-oh he's only going to post once a moon, nevermind, he just doesn't want to make Supreme American Man money.

Petty faggot is going to kill his channel out of spite, just like idubz.
 
Karl is the King Billy Mitchell’s biggest simp. How many of you guys have basically given Billy nearly $1m AUD (basically around $8000 USD).

None of you! I don’t care if you’ve bought his hot sauce a couple of times - I don’t see any of you basically making your family homeless for the King.
Granted 1 million AUD is like 5 cents in real money
 
There is only one solution, the final solution. Total. Slop. Blitz-oh he's only going to post once a moon, nevermind,

Now I think it’s a combination of
  • Have to take care of family and appease wife
  • Can’t make too much because then assets won’t be protected and he’ll have to pay back the settlement.
I think Lobst could probably find a way to pay Billy back at least some of it. He could also probably get to a settlement with Billy, but I don’t think he’s willing to deal with the terms of it.

If I was Billy, I’d settle it under the condition that Lobst has to include a statement at the beginning of every future video he publishes on any platform saying, “Billy Mitchell outsmarted me for shamelessly lying about Apollo Legend and deceiving my fans.” He’d also have to fork over 50% of all future sponsorship payments, which I’d use to buy a plot of land near where Lobst’s kids go to school and put up a massive billboard with rotating Lobst memes.

Unfortunately for Lobst, he doesn’t get the kind of viewship that would allow him to pay back the current judgment. He would have to get Coffezilla level views to be able to pay that back.
 
Karl Jobst aka "Not a Lobster" aka "Saddest Albino Alive" is relying upon the US Constitution to argue that requiring him to post a bond should be declined.

1781640366406.png
After requiring the same from Billy in the Australia case, he is now trying to get around doing the same by relying on his bad financial planning and current liquidity issues.
He also claims there is no legal basis for requiring he post a bond, which I already found to be untrue by virtue of using google for 30 seconds.

1781641198945.png

Enjoy the filing and plightsperging.
The affidavit is also very entertaining.
Cry more LOBSTER BOY

See attached PDFs
 

Archivos adjuntos

Última edición:
Karl Jobst aka "Not a Lobster" aka "Saddest Albino Alive" is relying upon the US Constitution to argue that requiring him to post a bond should be declined.

Ver archivo adjunto 9153756
After requiring the same from Billy in the Australia case, he is now trying to get around doing the same by relying on his bad financial planning and current liquidity issues.
He also claims there is no legal basis for requiring he post a bond, which I already found to be untrue by virtue of using google for 30 seconds.


Enjoy the filing and plightsperging.
The affidavit is also very entertaining.
Cry more LOBSTER BOY

See attached PDFs
Karl must be prompting ChatGPT on overdrive if he thought that this was even remotely a good idea.
 
My god that motion to deny costs is terrible.

Telling the court what to do (Judges love to be told what to do)
In circumstances where a demand lacks foundation in the FRCP, the court is required to undertake a "unguided Erie' 'inquiry to decide whether to apply state1aw or federal common law.

There is no law that says I have to pay (You tell them Karl)
Under going such an inquiry, the Court will find that no applicable statelaw or federal common law exists to support such a motion in the Southern District of Florida.

But local court rules say I do and they have authorithy (So do you have to pay or not Karl?)
lndeed, district courts do have authority to impose security for costs, though in practice the authority usually stems from state practice or a local rule.

Billy did not quote the rule which I mentioned later, so I don't have to pay (I guess the judge does not know the court rules and has to be told otherwise does not count)
The MSC cites no federal rule, binding authority, state statute or local rule that permits such a requirement.

Karl telling the court not only is it unconstitutional they lack the authority (Well if Karl says it must be denied, the court better listen)
The MSC makes a request that is unconstitutional, lacks any authority, and is made entirely in bad faith in a frantic ploy to suppress Plaintif's right to seek relief from the court. Therefore, the MSC must be denied.

It is bad faith because the counsel giggled (Also did not consider I have no lawyer and live in another country)
Plaintiff is of the belief that Defendant's decision to file two concurrent motions while counsel 'giggles', without allowing any leeway given Plaintic's pro se and foreign status, is illustrative of the bad faith nature of Defendant's strategy.
 
It's still absolutely incredible Karl is such a retard he rehabilitated the image of a guy who's been an international joke for multiple decades.
Wdym? Did you not come out thinking Billy was cool after stumbling across the documentary on Netflix circa late '00s? Were you not instantly smitten by the King of Kongs, his spectacularly flowing hair, and his hot sauce empire? I even have pictorial ebidence of my initial reaction to learning of the man.
you're-cool-beavis.gif
And the same can be said today. Please see attached reference for my thoughts on Billy today.
this-guy-is-cool-beavis.gif
 
LUS destoried Karl in his live stream
TLDR
90% chance of being dismissed. The main reason Karl's arguments are considered weak is that he largely repeats his original allegations instead of directly answering the legal defects raised in Billy Mitchell's motion to dismiss. Karl does not seem to know what court he is in. Citing caselaw from other states, for example citing anti-SLAPP statute from Georgia. The lawsuit is in Florida Karl which has different anti-SLAPP laws.

I am aware caselaw from other states can be persuasive, but Karl cites non-binding or unrelated authorities while overlooking controlling Eleventh Circuit or Florida authority. It kind of like saying, I don't want the court to follow the case law from the state it is in, instead, I want to follow another states caselaw because it says what I want. Karl, you are not persuasive at all.
 
Agreed - reading the completionist thread there’s been some pretty dumb revisionism at times. Some people seem to leap at the chance to write it off as some innocent mistakes. Jobst spiraling down a felting whirlpool of his own making doesn’t mean Jirard wasnt, at the very least, almost surely doing some “light fraud” at minimum
We still never received a proper answer about the golf event money (even in both of Jirard’s big comeback responses) which was a big concern since the Open Hand Foundation were only putting the money they earned from the Indieland streams on their taxes.

Jirard’s super lucky this didn’t happen a year after it did because we would have had access to Open Hand’s 2023 tax filings and would have been able to calculate the exact amount earned from Sponsors at the PBD 2023 golf tournament.

Dunking on Karl and Muta is good ol fun but it shouldn’t give leeway to bad parties like Jirard. If anything, it’s a good example of why incompetents like Karl and Muta shouldn’t involve themselves in situations like this. When they lose their credibility, it muddies the waters in spite of what evidence is present (and there was a good amount present of Jirard).

I still don’t believe Jirard was ignorant of what was going on. His dad’s office was in the same building as the office for That One Video Gamer (which his dad probably helped him get), his brother was working with both him and his dad, etc. Even if Jirard has daddy issues, like he said in one of his responses, he was still tightly knit enough for his dad to be involved in his business ventures and vice versa.
 
Última edición:
IMG_7099.jpeg
There’s something so hilarious to me whenever Billy seethes over Mordecai and Rigby especially as a fan of Regular Show myself. Like he seems to hate them more than his real life detractors.

He treats them as if they’re his Karl. It makes the episode of Regular Show he’s based on feel canon to reality.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 9161304
There’s something so hilarious to me whenever Billy seethes over Mordecai and Rigby especially as a fan of Regular Show myself. Like he seems to hate them more than his real life detractors.

He treats them as if they’re his Karl. It makes the episode of Regular Show he’s based on feel canon to reality.
I can't believe he's still butthurt about that. If Karl weren't such self-sucking faggot, Billy really would have been the lolcow in this story.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo