🌟 Internet Famous Karl Jobst / karljobst / FAQ_GOD / simthreat / approachhernow.com - Albino autist, Spergy speed runner, Pickup predator and Bitch of Mitchell

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Jobst v. Mitchell 0:26-cv-60997 — District Court, S.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    0:26-cv-60997
  • Court
    District Court, S.D. Florida
  • Filed
    7 de Abr, 2026
  • Nature of Suit
    360 P.I.: Other
  • Cause
    28:1332 Diversity
  • Jurisdiction
    Diversity
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    18 de Jun, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
William James Mitchell, Karl Jobst

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 27)

# Date Description Filing
24 18 de Jun, 2026 First REPLY in Support of Motion re 17 Defendant's MOTION for Bill of Costs (Security for Costs). filed by William James Mitchell. (Mitchell, Michele) (Entered: 06/19/2026) PDF
23 18 de Jun, 2026 First REPLY in Support of Motion re 16 MOTION to Dismiss 8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal . filed by William James Mitchell. (Mitchell, Michele) (Entered: 06/19/2026) PDF
22 16 de Jun, 2026 First STIPULATED MOTION for Substitution of Counsel. Substituting Michele T. Mitchell for Michele T. Mitchell, Esq. at JAMBP&H by William James Mitchell. Responses due by 7/1/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mitchell, Michele) (Entered: 06/17/2026) 1 2
21 15 de Jun, 2026 DECLARATION OF KARL JOBST IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS re 20 Response in Opposition to Motion by Karl Jobst (ksr) (Entered: 06/16/2026) PDF
20 15 de Jun, 2026 RESPONSE in Opposition re 17 Defendant's MOTION for Bill of Costs (Security for Costs) filed by Karl Jobst. Replies due by 6/23/2026. (ksr) (Entered: 06/16/2026) PDF
What an awful pile of garbage.

"The Motion to Dismiss does not engage with my complaint!"

It literally goes down all counts and explains why they all fail.
The Albino Faggot must have failed to input the Motion to Dismiss into the AI that wrote this.
 
Jobst is arguing against the Motion to Dismiss.

HAHAH he is fucking SEETHING! Pages and pages of autistic screeching :story: :story: :story: :story:

1781293783929.png
1781294049417.png

YOUR HONOUR I'M A LOBSTER HE POSTED MEMES OF MEEEEEEEEE 🤣
 
HAHAH he is fucking SEETHING! Pages and pages of autistic screeching :story: :story: :story: :story:

Ver archivo adjunto 9136941
Ver archivo adjunto 9136956

YOUR HONOUR I'M A LOBSTER HE POSTED MEMES OF MEEEEEEEEE 🤣
He really is in RAPED MINDSET from getting his public image destroyed by his own hand mostly. And of course partially from billy's team who dunked his albino ass in kangaroo court.

Like one could expect after losing this hard even by being told from the judge itself ´´No, lol ur lolsuit is bogus as F. Now leave mr american mullet sauce family man alone and you indeed accused him of being the responsible of the suicide of an American Youtuber Apollo Legend which is hearsay. Case dismissed now pay mr american mullet sauce family man from all this time wasted in both lawyer fees and him personally´´.

It's like karl can't just stick by doing his garbage ass slop videos about troons or despicable LE CHEATERS.

Instead he wants his embarrasment to be further known by the albino faggot who can't stop with the lolsuits over successful hot sauce & DK King Mr Billy William Mitchell.
 
AI generated slop
The message was clear: do not contact the trustee or there will be public retaliation.

Oh nonono, poor jobst (:_(
1000132171.png

This dude is such a FAGGOT lol.
ln the instant case, Jobst's shaking voice is the physical peculiarity. The viewer understood that Jobst's shaking voice meant that he was distressed, as inferred by the viewer's description of Jobst being ton the ropes badly''. Mitchell's reading of the comment aloud and endorsing it with his proclamation of escalation contirms Mitchel's knowledge
This entire document is just him seething because billy made fun of him him after he posted his post trial cope video. Maybe don't post a humiliating video next time? Most of the material billy used came from jobst anyways lol

1000132174.jpg
 
I like this part.
"The Plaintiff is not a public figure for the purposes of defamation and should only need to plausibly demonstrate negligence."

Karl, are you aware that the channel is called Karl Jobst and you face is on it? I don't think you get more pubic figure than that. I guess you are going to tell me the colonel is not the public figure of KFC.
The GoFundMe was for Karl Jobst.
The lawsuit was Karl Jobst, not the LCC.
Karl, it is all you buddy.
 
I know this isn't how the law works, but it would be funny if the Completionist could sue Karl Lobst following the exact same arguments Karl makes against Billy, because under those Lobst would be guilty of defaming the Completionist.
  • (1) Publication: Lobst's videos
  • (2) Falsity: No charity funds were embezzled
  • (3) Fault: Applying Lobst's arguments, the Completionist is a private person for the purposes of defamation, so Karl must only have acted negligibly, which he did (AccountingAndYouTube tried to correct Lobst but he continued his defamation)
  • (4) Defamation per se: Again following Lobst's logic, the fact that he accused the Completionist of charity fraud alone qualifies as defamation
Alzheimer research could use Lobst's money, but unfortunately he is bankrupt.

lobst.jpg
 
Última edición:
I know this isn't how the law works, but it would be funny if the Completionist could sue Karl Lobst following the exact same arguments Karl makes against Billy, because under those Lobst would be guilty of defaming the Completionist.

(1) Publication: Lobst's videos
(2) Falsity: No charity funds were embezzled
(3) Fault: Following Lobst's logic, the Completionist is a private person for the purposes of defamation, so Karl must only have acted negligibly, which he did (AccountingAndYouTube tried to correct Lobst but he continued his defamation)
(4) Defamation per se: Again following Lobst's logic, the fact that he accused the Completionist of charity fraud alone qualifies as defamation

Alzheimer research could use Lobst's money, but unfortunately he is bankrupt.
The only feasible reason why The Completionist has not filed a lawsuit against Karl and Mutahar is because even if some aspects of the story may have been incorrect, he cannot risk Discovery.

Even if some aspects of the story were false, the fat retard admitted in one of his response videos that some money went to his company to account for "cost of the event", after previously saying live on air that "all donations" (including bits and channel subscriptions during the event) would go towards the fundraiser. (That could also be fraud if this could be proven)

It would be self-destructive for him to bring up that old topic again, after one of his enemies epically fumbled the Mitchell lawsuit.
He has nothing to gain unless he can 100% vindicate himself, which I highly doubt is possible.
 
Even if some aspects of the story were false, the fat retard admitted in one of his response videos that some money went to his company to account for "cost of the event", after previously saying live on air that "all donations" (including bits and channel subscriptions during the event) would go towards the fundraiser. (That would also be fraud if this could be proven)
It would hurt him in regards to continuing his youtube career (which requires channels to at least appear to be moral), but a lot of charitable foundations only exist to pay oneself, family members, or friends a salary from money that would otherwise be taxed. It's not illegal. For example, it's common practice for pro athletes who make millions a year in their 20s-30s. https://www.sportsbusinessjournal.c...undations-Are-Shelter-Of-Choice-For-Athletes/
 
Última edición:
It would hurt him in regards to continuing his youtube career (which requires channels to at least appear to be moral), but a lot of charitable foundations only exist to pay oneself, family members, or friends a salary from money that would otherwise be taxed. It's not illegal.
Unless the charity is specifically the “pay my friends and family charity”, that would be fraud.

Although maybe you’re speaking practically, as in many charities seem to only pay out a fraction of their incoming donations, with the rest going to their “overhead”
 
Unless the charity is specifically the “pay my friends and family charity”, that would be fraud.

Although maybe you’re speaking practically, as in many charities seem to only pay out a fraction of their incoming donations, with the rest going to their “overhead”
Yes, that's what I mean, and I added a link showing that financial advisors recommend foundations to high-earning pro athletes. (Especially those with family members who work low-income jobs.) Of course it's not a 100% scam, but the actual expenditures to the stated causes are low compared to the overhead.
 
The only feasible reason why The Completionist has not filed a lawsuit against Karl and Mutahar is because even if some aspects of the story may have been incorrect, he cannot risk Discovery.

Even if some aspects of the story were false, the fat retard admitted in one of his response videos that some money went to his company to account for "cost of the event", after previously saying live on air that "all donations" (including bits and channel subscriptions during the event) would go towards the fundraiser. (That could also be fraud if this could be proven)

It would be self-destructive for him to bring up that old topic again, after one of his enemies epically fumbled the Mitchell lawsuit.
He has nothing to gain unless he can 100% vindicate himself, which I highly doubt is possible.
Also there'd be two defendants in that suit, one of which definitely has the cash, the drive and the autism to really fry Jirard's ass if he tries that stunt. As felted as Karl is, attempting to launch that lawsuit to bully him would still be suicide because there's nothing stopping the jeet from jumping in to throw his weight around.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo