😵‍💫 Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Galeocerdo]

He takes that idea from presidential candidate debates, which is exactly how it works — being heavily scripted from both sides.
And since the president has the highest authority in the country, this is the example you should be using too, if you were from the same country.

I mean sure, but this isn't a highly structured debate where the speaker is providing questions two people then have rehearsed answers for to then rarely deviate from those things because the entire thing is entirely scripted and isn't about having either side come to a consensus on something, it's about arguing their seperate points and having the audience decide.

The key difference is Acerthorn clearly frames them as debates where either his 'opponent' makes him change his mind, or he changes his 'opponents' mind and to really not go over this again, he's bringing a cannon to a battle where he's in a fort up a mountain with the cannon aiming down and his opponent has to fight from the bottom with a knife whilst crippled. It's not a true debate by any sense of the word because he's making every effort to make it impossible for him to lose and then arbitrarily deciding he's won if the other person doesn't agree he has.

 

[Harvey Danger]

I was just about to go to bed and I thought, hey, I should check if Stabby filed anything stupid. Yes, yes he did.

Not just stupid, but provably false.

Their testimony is also relevant to proving that Defamation #7, #8, and #9 (¶¶ 97-114 of the Complaint) are all false. Yes, I was aggressive and disrespectful to them, but only because they had gone out of their way to push me over the edge. That doesn't mean that I, generally speaking, am just some overly toxic and bitter man who sees any disagreement with me as harassment, which is what the Defendant portrayed me as in the smear video.

But a judge ruled Stabby was too toxic and abrasive to even answer phones. (2nd half of this post) He doesn't reserve his aggressiveness for people who harass him, he's an asshole to complete strangers on the phone attempting to give his company money.

Stabby claims his reflexive rudeness to complete strangers is a medical condition, i.e. being an asshole is something inherent to himself. The judge ruled even with "accommodation" he's unfit to talk to human beings. So both the legal system and Stabby himself agreed, on the record, that being an aggressive asshole is in his nature.

SidAlpha is in a rare position where he can objectively claim his subject is aggressive and disrespectful to literally everyone. Literally literally everyone, not just a hyperbolic everyone.

 

[Billy Beeple]

I was just about to go to bed and I thought, hey, I should check if Stabby filed anything stupid. Yes, yes he did.

One thing that strikes me about Stabby's pleadings is his apparent inability to distinguish facts from his own inane legal conclusions. I wonder if he's ever asked himself why opposing counsel in his many lawsuits sometimes file declarations in support of their pleadings. The magistrate in ECF 131 basically laid out a map of how to get the subpoenas issued, and Stabby didn't follow it at all.

And just linking to a chat with a hallucinating AI and a blog post on cyberbullying makes me wonder if his heart is still in this, or if he's just going through the motions (pun intended).

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

One thing that strikes me about Stabby's pleadings is his apparent inability to distinguish facts from his own inane legal conclusions. I wonder if he's ever asked himself why opposing counsel in his many lawsuits sometimes file declarations in support of their pleadings. The magistrate in ECF 131 basically laid out a map of how to get the subpoenas issued, and Stabby didn't follow it at all.

And just linking to a chat with a hallucinating AI and a blog post on cyberbullying makes me wonder if his heart is still in this, or if he's just going through the motions (pun intended).

1. You forget that Stabby is all knowing when it comes to Law so he don't need no help. What he sez is "his truth"
2. You also forget the whole US justice system is out to get Stabby, so he'd never take any advice from them all they're all trying to get him back into a cell. Padded or otherwise.
3. He's a massive faggot. He knows the law about as well as Greer, even after 20 years of frivolous lolsuits, and he still can't or won't change his tactics because see #1.

 

[Galeocerdo]

@DSP's Tax Lawyer - Here's a big dump from Stabby all over you.


-

-

Special mention to the guy who commented on this one;

Somehow to Stabby having a 4 month old baby makes someone a pedo? Fucking lmao.


Did you mention reducing his lat pulls DSPTL? I would think though if he was actually reading YOUR advice and using it his whole workout would be entirely different. But hey, now you have 3 days of me not paying attention to catch up on and give us a run down with, enjoy your meal.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

@DSP's Tax Lawyer - Here's a big dump from Stabby all over you.

Ver archivo adjunto 9107342
-
Ver archivo adjunto 9107345
-
Ver archivo adjunto 9107349
Special mention to the guy who commented on this one;
Ver archivo adjunto 9107351
Somehow to Stabby having a 4 month old baby makes someone a pedo? Fucking lmao.

Ver archivo adjunto 9107361
Did you mention reducing his lat pulls DSPTL? I would think though if he was actually reading YOUR advice and using it his whole workout would be entirely different. But hey, now you have 3 days of me not paying attention to catch up on and give us a run down with, enjoy your meal.

I am glad he is doing 6 upper body exercises with an exercise for shoulders, one for triceps, and one for biceps while doing a single, shitty leg exercise. Its not like legs are one of the biggest muscles in the body or anything

 

[Nick G]

Stebbins' vexatious litigant status in the Northern District of California has been AFFIRMED by the Ninth Circuit. It's over, Stebbins bros...

Stebbins was already subject to the filing restrictions the order imposed, so this does not change his ability to file cases. However, it does finalize the issue and prevent him from claiming the Northern California vexatious litigant designation will likely be overturned on appeal, which he has repeatedly claimed since the original order.

Stebbins already requested rehearing and en banc review (also attached), which obviously will not happen.

 

[DavidS877]

Stebbins' vexatious litigant status in the Northern District of California has been AFFIRMED by the Ninth Circuit. It's over, Stebbins bros...

I hadn't read this case much, but I noticed the telephone recording thing. Apparently Stabby tried to claim that he could legally record Google as he was talking to them about a Federal case and Federal law is only one party consent. Then tried to claim that since he recorded in Arkansas that Arkansas law applied, also one party. He of course tried to explain this to a Federal Court in California about a call to a company he knew was in California, which requires two party consent.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I think we have a copy of the phone recording because of course Stabby uploaded it to Jew Tube.

I vaguely remember the lawyer being very patient and friendly while our Mr Stabby was his usual asshole self. Stabby got of lucky once again, the judge let the recording slide once it was deleted.

 

[Random Troll]

Stebbins already requested rehearing and en banc review (also attached), which obviously will not happen.

Maybe this filthy fuck needs to go wash his hands, because he seems to always complain about "unclean hands".
Somebody should smack this piece of shit.

 

[Nick G]

Stebbins filed his brief in his appeal of the dismissal of his Delaware case against Rumble in May 2025 (1:24-cv-01174) (appeal 25-2008). This was the case where Stebbins argued that Rumble is vicariously liable for videos posted by Spectre.

Stebbins' brief restates his frivolous legal theory that platforms can be held vicariously liable for the conduct of users, notwithstanding Section 230's express prohibition on this outcome. Stebbins' theory is based on on a mischaracterization of the Third Circuit case Anderson v. TikTok (2024). In that case, a 10-year-old was repeatedly recommended self-harm videos as "For You" by the TikTok algorithm, and eventually died after performing acts similar to those depicted in the videos. The Third Circuit held that, while TikTok was not directly responsible for the content of the self-harm videos, they could be found liable for systematically suggesting a 10-year-old watch self-harm videos.

Anderson is a deeply flawed decision for a number of reasons, but that is besides the point, as Anderson's holding is completely unrelated to the facts Stebbins is alleging. Under Stebbins' tortured reading of Anderson, Rumble gives up Section 230 protections and can be sued for the content of Spectre's videos because it has an algorithm that sometimes recommends Spectre's videos. Anderson clearly does not say that.

Perhaps realizing how frivolous his legal theory is, Stebbins' brief is only 7 pages, and 4 of 7 pages are devoted to a general rant against the judiciary, often in districts other than Delaware. Among other complaints, Stebbins spends multiple paragraphs complaining about the judge in Stebbins v. Redfield (Northern California), and several additional paragraphs complaining about the judge in Stebbins v. Moon (Virginia).

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

lol, Stabby spends more then half the "appeal" complaining about how the judges are mean to him and that they should be "investigated" by...someone I guess? Maybe the police should be called in. The LAW POLICE to investigate the crime of being not nice to David and awarding him the billion dollars he deserves!

Most of his mumbo jumbo is just that, he's claiming the ruling vs TikTok somehow means that now he can sue any publisher because section 230 no longer applies because...the algorithm or some other retarded idea. I'm not even going to mention how that ruling is being appeal and will probably be struck down because it's just a rogue judge ignoring precedent to push their own political agenda.

All in all a pretty good example of David's twisted mind making everyone out to be his enemy, even those who have just read his case and never even talked with him.

I give it 7 ass burgers out of 10

 

[SCV]

However, it does finalize the issue and prevent him from claiming the Northern California vexatious litigant designation will likely be overturned on appeal,

Sorry sweaty, he can still claim that right up until either the time to appeal to the supreme court expires or they decline to hear his appeal.

 

[AnOminous]

"Don't worry it's just the start of my legal research"

"Anyway, just click here and you will see that AI says I'm right"

Holy shit, he didn't even get a paragraph without a contradiction/lie

AI is amplifying the retardation in the world because it is programmed to tell retards that their retardation is correct.

 

[Galeocerdo]

AI is amplifying the retardation in the world because it is programmed to tell retards that their retardation is correct.

Yup, this is what happens when you make a product to appease rather than educate, when AI could be better used elsewhere. It's why I can't wait for the bubble to pop on it all.

Anyhow, More Stabby excercise;



Man I still can't get over how he says **CONCLUSION** like it's a dissertation lmao. Anyhow, we now have an insight to why he gave up exercising last year, he was performing this ludicrous idea of an exercise regime and it (as pointed out by @DSP's Tax Lawyer first time around) would begin seeing diminished returns and him seeing worse results over time. It's blowing my mind that the man spends his life online and must clearly be seeing a lot of evidence to point him away from this, given his recent addiction to AI you reckon he's getting GPT/Grok work out regimes which're always going to be bullshit.

Maybe stabby will have a heart attack brought on by Grok-supported workout?

 

[moocow]

Maybe this filthy fuck needs to go wash his hands, because he seems to always complain about "unclean hands".
Somebody should smack this piece of shit.

Like so many lolcows in this world, a good hard ass kicking would do him a lot of good, just generally speaking, especially if provoked directly by something stupid he does to someone in person to earn it.

 

[Oliver Onions]

Like so many lolcows in this world, a good hard ass kicking would do him a lot of good

Without an ounce of hate in my heart (well okay, maybe a little) most of them would be better off dead. Their continued existence serves absolutely no benefit to anyone.

 

[Harvey Danger]

Like so many lolcows in this world, a good hard ass kicking would do him a lot of good, just generally speaking, especially if provoked directly by something stupid he does to someone in person to earn it.

It wouldn't change a thing. He would demand that you justify why he deserved an ass kicking, then he'd demand justification for each individual punch. Then he'd never agree to any of the reasons.

"OK even if I deserved the first punch in the face, how did I deserve the second? Or punches 3-27? Or kicks 1-12? ...that explanation is insufficient, please explain your reasoning in detail. Also you need to refute my 17 arguments showing why that first punch was not deserved, and why this beatdown failed to provide ADA accommodation for my assburgers."

 

[306h4Ge5eJUJ]

AI is amplifying the retardation in the world because it is programmed to tell retards that their retardation is correct.

I've repeatedly observed an intriguing phenomenon where rich people grow increasingly unhinged as the yes-men attracted by their power begin to surround them, in a way that resembles a coke addiction. Thanks to AI, a penniless hotdog addict can experience what was heretofore restricted to the rich and powerful. Truly these are the times of all times.

 

[WarJams]

We're just in reruns rewalks at this point. We might as well just retread all of our old takes too.

Three miles per hour is walking. To call it a run borders on farcical.

the judge let the recording slide once it was deleted.

Was that the time where he changed his computer's time and date to make it look like he had already deleted the recording, but there was other stuff in the folder with dates that fell after the falsified date?