Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
😵💫 SkitzocowDavid Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.
🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
The Court also notes, in anticipation of renewed requests, that unmasking anonymous speakers on the (lowercase I) internet and obtaining their contact information may implicate First Amendment and privacy concerns.
I like the judges warning Stabby, mostly because in typical assburgers fashion it will almost certainly make him spazz out further at those fucking biased judges.
I’m torn. I don’t want any of these people to get unmasked but I’d love to see Stebbins trying to run a deposition. Especially if the opposing attorney has lots of objections to form and relevance.
This is not next, as it has happened in the past, but still. Archive of the post.
I don't think Acerthorn is capable of staying calm.
I also don't think he is capable of accepting it and moving on.
It's quite funny that his last post was about him supposedly reaching the same stage as last year (when he dropped the gym) and now he's a day later being "Too tired" to go to the gym, me thinks this is what happened last time and he just went "Fuck it I'm out."
Surely this is should speak to him that his routine is bullshit and he needs to change it? @DSP's Tax Lawyer
There is a checkbox on his shitty googledaki where he tries to make you sign away all of your rights to ownership of your end of the debate and, if you say "no, that's clearly asinine," he runs away like a scared little bitch.
It's all just a vehicle for him to try to extort more people. No one should ever "debate" this reprobate.
It's quite funny that his last post was about him supposedly reaching the same stage as last year (when he dropped the gym) and now he's a day later being "Too tired" to go to the gym, me thinks this is what happened last time and he just went "Fuck it I'm out."
Surely this is should speak to him that his routine is bullshit and he needs to change it? @DSP's Tax Lawyer
His workout routine is god awful. You need to rest the different body parts after you work them out. He is hitting full body workouts every other day and then trying to max out his cardio right after (and sometimes before). Its just insanely poor programming that will just tire him out with no results
His workout routine is god awful. You need to rest the different body parts after you work them out. He is hitting full body workouts every other day and then trying to max out his cardio right after (and sometimes before). Its just insanely poor programming that will just tire him out with no results
That's what gets me. Where the fuck did he pull this regime from and why does he KEEP doing it when it didn't work the first time and he (obviously) reads KF and see's people pointing out his issues, but decides "Naw fuck it, Imma do this." Is it him desperate to prove his moronic ideas right he's willing to just make everything infinitely harder lmao.
A tentative ruling (?) has been issued in the h3h3 lawsuit against Denims. The ruling finds that a blank stare for minutes at a time is still sufficient transformation to achieve fair use, even when she announced ahead of time the point was to stop h3h3 from getting views. The judge cites to Stabby's stupid lolsuit while analyzing the first factor:
The facts here closely align with those in Stebbins v. Alphabet Inc., No. 22-CV-00546-JSW, 2025 WL 2233208 (N.D. Cal. July 2, 2025). In Stebbins, the court found the subject livestreams to be “highly transformative works” because the livestreams involved the viewing of the subject video “for seconds at a time before pausing to respond and critique” the subject video...
The subject video, created by the plaintiff, provided the plaintiff’s analysis and opinions regarding a video game. Id. The livestreams, however, provided commentary on the subject video as well as several additional hours regarding other videos produced by the plaintiff and his comments thereon. Id. The relevant livestream in Stebbins “paus[ed] . . . and comment[ed] on Plaintiff’s Retrospective with the purpose of reviewing or mocking the video.”...
As in Stebbins, Defendant’s livestream provided commentary on The Nuke and sharp criticism of the claims made within the documentary. Throughout the livestream, Defendant often paused The Nuke to offer spontaneous reactions, engaged with her audience through a live chat and provided real-time commentary interspersed with tangential discussions.
The courts have found that copying another work in its entirety is not dispositive as to infringement if necessary for the intended transformative use. See Hosseinzadeh, 276 F. Supp. at 46 (“[A] great deal of Plaintiff’s work was copied, but such copying was plainly necessary to the commentary and critique.”); Stebbins, 2025 WL 2233208, at *6 (“Even if the Court were to credit Plaintiff’s claim that Creetosis copied the entirety of the Retrospective, that would not be dispositive. Creetosis used the Retrospective clips in order to further the Livestream’s “transformative purpose of critical commentary.”);
If nothing else, Stabby can know that his retarded flailings have brought some success for litigants. Not for wereturkeys, but at least for dead eyed, braindead OnlyFans bimbos.
Edit: may have jumped the gun, this looks like a tentative decision, but I think the hearing on it actually happens tomorrow.
That's what gets me. Where the fuck did he pull this regime from and why does he KEEP doing it when it didn't work the first time and he (obviously) reads KF and see's people pointing out his issues, but decides "Naw fuck it, Imma do this." Is it him desperate to prove his moronic ideas right he's willing to just make everything infinitely harder lmao.
He got his routine by watching a few people at the gym doing some exercises and he feels the need to do enough exercises to hit every part of his body. He refuses to learn because he thinks he knows everything
I was just about to go to bed and I thought, hey, I should check if Stabby filed anything stupid. Yes, yes he did.
Stabby v Redfield, N.D. California, 23-cv-321
Vexatious litigant crying to the judiciary about how he should be able to dox and financially ruin people because he's being "defamed" and "cyberbullied".
He says the Google AI link will expire in 10 days so I'll post the TXT export.
This is so lame. We are denied authentic lolcow milk. I don't want this slop.
Is it common for Google's AI to on reference half the provided citations in its writing? Maybe this is evidence the AI's response was edited.
"I have been trying to explain for years to the judges of this District that I am the victim of all of these things, and yet they still insist that my harassers' right to be anonymous on the Internet overrides my right to not be harassed, It's infuriating."
"I don't debate bad faith trolls" - No shit Stabby, you don't debate full stop. You purposefully pick out retards who have no ability to hold a cogent argument or even the basic intelligence to hold any form of debate stance, then double down on it all by making them hand over their entire script and demanding they never deviate from it (Which.. isn't how debates work).
He takes that idea from presidential candidate debates, which is exactly how it works — being heavily scripted from both sides.
And since the president has the highest authority in the country, this is the example you should be using too, if you were from the same country.
I was just about to go to bed and I thought, hey, I should check if Stabby filed anything stupid. Yes, yes he did.
Stabby v Redfield, N.D. California, 23-cv-321
Man, this got filed in fucking LATE. Because I checked too last night around close of business and didn't see shit.
Edit: Reading this retarded shit, and it's so funy.
"They are defaming me by saying I sue literally everyone on Earth. This is defamation, and to prove it you need to let me unmask and depose people all over the Earth so that I can sue them."
"I AM NOT some generally toxic and overly bitter man who sees any disagreements with me as harassment, because I also see other disagreements with me as conspiratorial arbitrary persecution from judges in this country who only rule against me because I am David Stebbins."
"Also, look at me sue this guy I doxed in this case in Delaware that the judge already threw out of Delaware, because nobody lives in Delaware, and is now lost at sea like a fucking ghost ship, with no port-of-call because Arkansas wont accept it because I am a vexatious litigant."
"Lastly, and least importantly, the court demands I think about other people's rights. And that makes me mad! Everyone should just give me what I want, because I asked an AI chatbot and it said people having rights was debunked." *cracks knuckles* "Don't worry, I'm just getting started."
"If this evil court dares deny me again, then they need to call me and set up an ex parte zoom call to tell me what I have to do to force the court to do my bidding, because I don't feel like waiting, I want this NOW NOW NOW and don't want to file a third time."
