Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

Mondays gonna be glorious, most are Monday Friday 9-5 stuff, so we will absolutely see more milk coming down from these vile roaches losing jobs. Best Monday in a while.
There will be a lot of people who by noon find out that their passwords don't work and hr has a meeting with them. Especially since many of their bosses won't roll in until 9 and discuss things with legal first
 
So I reflected on all the hate my posts were getting on here and all the threatening messages I was getting and realized I needed to find another way to help.

I began collecting the email addresses of the local churches in my city, all the staff and congregation, and began sending an email to 10 of them at a time requesting their help in fulfilling one of Charlie Kirks final wishes:

Ver archivo adjunto 7917724

I asked them to contact their congressman and senators (I even provided a link to find their congressmen and senators) and demand that H-1B's be eliminated and out-sourcing jobs to India made illegal in Charlies memory.

I've been at it for 4 hours and have sent emails to around 200 people so far. I can only send an email to 10 people at a time or the email system locks up for an hour but 1 email addressed to 10 people every 10 mins seems to be ok.

Wow. The responses have been excellent. I didn't realize most American's hate Indians and H1B so much!!! Very encouraging. Maybe someone above is helping out, I don't know.

Anyways I hope this news makes up for all the hate I've cause on here. Hoping we can all work together and ban Indian's from American again like we did in the 1920's, that'd help make sure America is a slightly better place than it is now when his kids grow up.
If you actually did this I forgive you for gloating over that soldier pleading for his life. Reciepts? Don’t post any identifying info of course.
 
I agree making it illegal is 100% bad.

I'm split on the "call their employers". In a vacuum, I'd say its bad, and de-facto suppression of Free Speech.
In practice, the left set these rules of engagement and made up the whole "not free from the consequences" mantra. If they hadn't spent the last 6 years getting people fired for social media posts over asinine shit, then they probably wouldn't be having to face e-Judgement Day for their Charlie Kirk gravedancing posts.
Or you could see it another way. If a person voluntarily decides to celebrate Kirk's murder, something that healthy people would find revolting and upsetting, let other people expose them to the world. Then it is the employer who has to make a decision. Does he or she then defend his or her employee's statement and do nothing, or does he or she fire this employee?

If the employer chooses to tarnish the reputation of their business and drive away customers by defending murder enthusiasts, that's their decision. If they choose to ignore any company policy governing the ethical requirements of their employees, that's on them. Let the employers voluntarily choose to suffer the consequences of whatever decision they choose to make.
 
I don't believe that's true. I believe that the point of aim and point of impact differed due to poor or no range estimation compared to the zero of the optic, which is the #1 cause of missed long range shots. I believe that the zero for the rifle was set at something like 20y/300y and the bullet was on an upward trajectory in relation to the line of sight, making the point of impact higher than intended.

The only kind of armor that would possibly ricochet a shot would be steel armor, and steel armor is for cheap retards. Someone who has enough money to hire security professionals and consultants is going to listen to those professionals when they tell him he needs level IV ceramic armor if he intends to defend himself against a threat level that includes long guns.
Kirk was also sitting in a recessed arena below ground level so the shooter's aim was significantly downward, all the more reason for the impact point to be higher than he saw in the scope. I doubt Kirk wore armor since as you said ceramic is the only option against long guns and it's really heavy and uncomfortable. The expected threat profile was probably "nutjob charging the stage" which his bodyguards could deal with.
 
Fucking papist. You do realize that protestant cares about early saints too, right? And Peter and Paul are apostles, in the bible, and kinda important to Christians in general?
I'm not a catholic and not an american evangelical so no I don't know how evangelicals feel about the catholic, the biggest christian group in my country are pentecostals who don't beleive in saints, so my bad I projected that unto the evangelicals.
 
his is a GamerGate-tier event right now, but at a bigger scale.
It sounds gay but it's really true. The way people have been talking about how this event put into focus for them the way the media lies for the left, and how unhinged the left is, is really reminiscent of Gamergate, except with much higher stakes.

The stakes was really the problem with gamergate, normies couldnt bring themselves to give a shit about it because it was contained to internet spaces and nerd fandoms. But what it demonstrated, the way that leftists acted over it, the way a completely fugazi narrative was just spoken into existence by these reprobate liars, how they just breathlessly reversed victim and offender, it was just like what we're seeing now.
 
Última edición:
so yeah, this is how they are raising their kids:

Screen Shot 2025-09-14 at 22.38.38.webp


this is the left!
 
Because being LGB+ is literally a cult. Below is a list of all the typical features of a cult, notice how many of them overlap with progressive/trans ideology. Ostracising those that choose to leave is cult management 101 because the fear of being punished makes other members more likely to stay. A cult doesn't necessarily have all of these features, just most of them in some form.
It's a psyoped cult pushed by the pharmaceutical/plastic surgery industry, using social shame as an attack vector, as far as I am concerned.

Once someone goes down the medical path of trooning out, either just hormones or all on black surgery, they're hooked. You've got a client for life unless they stop and back out really quick. The whole "transgenders are at a higher rate of suicide/don't bully them" shaming tactic is a perfect cover for the fact those high suicide numbers are largely due to post surgical complications. That is why you've seen such a concentrated push to lower the ages/open the flood gates, gotta keep those clients with free state healthcare we can bill rolling in to replace losses, just like the tobacco companies have to keep replacing dead smokers.

If you want to cut the head off the snake, you need to focus on the pharmaceutical/plastic surgery/healthcare lobbyists. Anything else is just tilting at windmills as far as I'm concerned.
 
I'm not a catholic and not an american evangelical so no I don't know how evangelicals feel about the catholic, the biggest christian group in my country are pentecostals who don't beleive in saints, so my bad I projected that unto the evangelicals.
I think you might just misunderstand the whole concept of saints, actually, or at least what it means when a denomination "doesn't believe in saints", but I really just like calling people papists.
Peter and Paul are the most important non-Jesus Christians in all denominations I know of with the possible addition of John. Maybe mormons and stuff don't think that, but they're really another entire religion rather than a type of Christian.
 
I don't know if anyone has been on /pol/ recently (yeah I know) but there's some guy that keeps posting death threats about Asmongold https://boards.4chan.org/pol/thread/515987156 He's been doing this for the past couple of days now. Not sure how credible it is but it wouldn't surprise me if they/thems are targeting him next.
I have a suspicion that is Dave Rivera aka Airbagged. But can't prove it. He has been sperging the fuck out about Asmongold getting game devs fired and is a known /mu/ fag. He has a lolcow thread here. He commonly threatens death on people.
 
The fact that Hasan had one of the tamer reactions to Charlie's assasination (that I saw) makes this all the worse for him, where'd your spine go little buddy?
One of two things:
-He knows that being even apathetic about this after all the shit he said will get him banned for the 10th time and wants to avoid it because he's already been banned twice in 2025 alone.
-He's legitimately fucked up because he's one of the more well known voices of the left and is now worried some crazy right winger will gun him down in his socialist mansion.
 
Ask yourself:
What is the next wrong think to get this same treatment?
Will I be on the right or wrong side?
Do I want this applied to me or my loved ones?
ITT, a retard newfag that doesn't understand why promoting violence is detrimental to free speech and political debate.

First off, fuck you faggot. Knock it off with this moralfagging.

The reason why you shouldn't be celebrating suffering his death is because he was a representation of what this fucking forum and the entirety of the Internet has stood for. It exists because people are allowed to say shit *without fucking getting killed for it*. Free speech and freedom of expression is a hallmark of modern and civilized society. Promoting and celebrating someone getting killed for utilizing their free speech rights actively promotes the idea it's perfectly fine to kill someone for saying something you disagree with.

Are you one of those retards that lack second-order cognitive ability like the left does?

Do you know why the right is using the left's tools to silence them? Because violent speech is not protected speech, and it actively stifles free speech. Killing your political opponent for not agreeing with them is something that happens in second and third world shitholes. Dictatorships and actual fascist regimes. It is not something that should ever happen in the West and it should never, ever fucking be normalized.

It should cost a shitton of social, political, and monetary capital to promote the suppression of free speech when you are perfectly okay with allowing someone to call for violence against someone who they disagree with.

If you're ok with that, you are free to fuck off to the Middle East, Africa, or Latin America, Communist China, or Communist North Korea, where they won't hesitate to execute you for having the wrong train of thought.

Otherwise, if you're going to celebrate his death, do it in the privacy of your own home, just like how you masturbate to Mario porn.
 
Última edición:
I don't even understand this argument. This train left the station at least 15 years ago. If Trump hadn't won in 2016, they would probably have amended the 1st amendment to exclude hate speech by now.
What's not to understand? The government has already overreached (see the Patriot Act, among many other examples). Subjecting Americans to constant violations of their fourth and fifth amendment rights at airports under the guise of "security" is blatantly unconstitutional. "Oh, well, you're here [at this specific place], so your constitutional rights are automatically suspended because muh turrism." That's just one example.

"Implied consent" laws are similarly unconstitutional. "We allege you're too drunk to drive, and we're allowed to draw your blood or test your breath against your will under pain of loss of rights whether you consent or not. That testimony, which we can lawfully compel you to give, can be used against you in court. You 'automatically' consented by accepting your license, but you also have to verbally consent to it (while drunk, as we allege) after we read a very wordy, legally-complex document (again, while you're drunk, as we allege), and your verbal consent is binding (despite, again, your alleged drunkenness). Did we mention you're not allowed to consult an attorney or make any phone calls right now either? And if you refuse, we can use that against you in court?

"Also, no, that drunk girl in the passenger seat, who you had sex with earlier tonight didn't actually consent -- she was too drunk, lol, so although we use implied consent to argue your consent despite your intoxication, we will also deny she gave consent despite her intoxication when you try to defend yourself against any claims of sexual assault."

Fuck all that noise. But it's reality. Welcome aboard!

My argument is -- they've already done it, they're gonna do it more, and we'll be fighting it either way. Might as well turn the fucking assholes' tools against our enemies when we can.
 
Última edición:
Oh so NOW the left decides to believe in cancel culture. Well you’re lucky you’re dealing with just cancel culture and not a free helicopter ride culture, just saying.
 
I do know you work as a demolition man or something like that, how will that affect your place of work? Will you see people vanish, or will it just be you and your buddies having a good laugh at current events over lunch break?
I don't work there anymore but

because of the NATURE of how DEADLY that job CAN be (crowbars, saws, knives, nailboards, wrecking bars, scrap metal, huge falls, electrical, ect) theres LITTLE fucking tolerance for hostility. I even saw one situation where a guy was such a prick with dumb bs (calling lunch before boss did, getting everyone else yelled at, ect) that when everyone started getting a bit hostile with him (yelling, calling him a bitch, ect ect ect) the boss was forced to fire him. IT IS NOT GOOD to have bad blood on that kinda job site as it only takes a few seconds to murder someone with basically any tool available.

I didn't see many libtards on that job save for one guy who sperged out about how he thought notch was a nazi, and other shit. I also recall our white foreman had to pull him aside because he had a meltdown about BLM and someone getting shot or something (very justified) and he had to explain to him like a fucking 8 year old how ALL ADULTS face consequences, and even him, the white foreman, if he pulled a gun on cops, he would be shot. It was honestly fucking embarrassing to see, because his response was "but he had family!!!" as if that means hes immune to law. I don't think he ever got FIRED to my knowledge, but our foreman was also EXCEPTIONALLY talented with social skills which helped. Dude probably could of been very talented as a special ed teacher NGL.

I also remember distinctly when I started hearing how the company said it had "no deaths on the job site, except for this one guy who was a pedophile soooo". Which makes me think someone killed him and nobody felt like snitching. (can't confirm, and I'd never ask)

As for this, a lot of guys on construction are sort of reformed christian, rough dudes who turned to christ, I wouldn't say its the MAJORITY, but its enough, maybe 35%? And you'd have to be out your FUCKING MIND to allow someone praising that death to stay. Setting aside any and all PR shit, like with the pedophile situation, all it takes is a floor being isolated with the person who said that, a few people who didn't like it, a shove on an elevator shaft and a "idk boss, he didn't look where he was going, right mark?" "yeah" and then the death is covered up. And considering how galvanized Christians are, I could 100% see this. Or worse, they might attack coworkers for being christian, and THEN it turns into a brawl with hammers, crowbars, knives, nailboards....NO employer wants that. It shows instability which is VERY bad. You can be a drunk, you can be stupid, you can be a former drug addict, you can be an ex con, you can be a LOT of shit in demo if you are willing to work hard, but unstable and violent isn't acceptable.

So yeah, unless the foreman was SEEKING to dispatch these guys (or was already leftist?) keeping those guys on just means headaches either from lack of team cohesion (vital in that job) or paperwork when he dies. Generally in demo, people are wildly different. One of my coworkers called himself a satanist, but I DID NOT get into it with him, and he didn't get into it with me being christian, and we otherwise got along great with mutual respect. Comradely in that job is nearly a job requirement, since you are dealing with filthy, dangerous, painful, nasty environments all day where bleeding is an everyday occurrence, the LAST thing you want is coworker drama. Everyone knows that so everyone with a brain plays nice.

TL;DR : urge to murder / endorsing murder openly in job filled with BASICALLY tool versions of dozens of medieval weapons bad, they would be absolutely fired.

edit : I want to add it also depends if COWORKERS know. if they coworkers remained unaware, perhaps it could slide, if the boss was very apathetic, but if the coworkers knew AND got angry in more than like 20% of their work force, they would be practically forced to fire them, unless they wanted to gamble on outcome.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo