Charlie Kirk: Aftermath, Gravedancing, and Manhunt

One thing I've been dwelling on about all this is if they give this kid a book of empty pages the size of a Stephen King novel and told him to fill it with everything he knows; names, addresses, discord groups, reddit users, telegram groups, people who he knew in college that he corraborated with, the works, and in exchange he gets life in supermax with a chance to get to suck some troon dick on his birthday and at christmas and the information he gives leads to some serious exposure and arrests to who's pulling the strings then I'd say Charlie getting clipped in the neck was worth it.
Charlie bled out in front of his wife and kids. His kids are going to grow up without a father. There is nothing that makes this "Worth it".
 
I just wanted to post about this again because of how funny this fanfic is.

Ver archivo adjunto 7917640

"Guys, he might have been questioning if he was gay, but realized he wasn't so asked his gay lover to transition because sucking tranny cock isn't gay!!!"
Wouldn't that imply that people are being groomed onto becoming transgender?
 
SInce Tyler probably did this in an effort to gunt guard his tranny bf, I thought you guys would be interested in learning about the retarded ideology that could have inspired his actions. Behold, the Anarchist Gender Accelerationist Manifesto.
Anarchist theory in general is varying degrees of justifying psychopathy, or re-inventing the wheel. That's all you need to know about it.
"An Anarchist is a man who – when he is not a police agent – is fated always and everywhere to attain the opposite of that which he attempts to achieve."
 
Furry sissy porn gooner tranny fucker lies with every breath he takes, more news at 11.
some poster said that maybe the parents were faking it but i think they would have deleted the pics if they literally thought he was possessed by demons. I think he just hates christians like a family member said so he's making shit up to make them look bad.
 
Anarchist theory in general is varying degrees of justifying psychopathy, or re-inventing the wheel.
"An Anarchist is a man who – when he is not a police agent – is fated always and everywhere to attain the opposite of that which he attempts to achieve."

It's like I said multiple times: Anarchists don't hate the police, they envy the police.
 
No one is “targeting” anyone. There are plenty of employers who aren’t firing people for these deranged takes. But a lot of people are rightfully appalled by such brazen support of murder, so naturally they’re contacting the places that hire individuals calling for more violence. Look, my job once told us that we aren’t allowed to post photos with alcoholic beverages because “we represent our company” even when not at work. I don’t agree with it, but it’s their choice, and it’s who I choose to be employed by.
I don't know to what extent it is happening but my feed has shown it has happened in several situations which I find problematic. It could be a minor issue overall.

It's a grey line with what you say online. My LinkedIn and Twitter are my professional pages so I avoid politics. Those are fair game since it's public. I think it does matter what you put online. My Facebook is just my friends and family so employers can fuck themselves because that's my private space.

The case posted here about Staples was justified because they weren't doing their job. They rep Staples, not them.

I think in some cases, an employee might have been a problem for a while and the employer was just looking for the right slip up. Who knows. People can sue back and then it gets ugly.

Yes people get emotional online and exaggerate. What matters is what they do in the real world. In some cases, online behaviour really shows how messed up someone is and sometimes it's about people just following 'their tribe'
 
Wouldn't that imply that people are being groomed onto becoming transgender?
"Well I mean obviously you're not a fag if you're with a trans person. I mean you're still butt fucking a biological male and there's no pussy involved, but I PROMISE it's totally straight."
 
I'm not sure how to explain it, but somewhere along the way the trans mindset went from "I want to be the other sex" to "I want to be trans".

I'm no tranny lover, I don't know much about the culture, but as an outsider looking in it's impossible not to notice the shift.
like i said
tumblr brained.

since all the identity issues all originate in tumblr. long before reddit and twitter got corrupted.

its why all of them tend to have a bio similar to ...

"Zir/Zer, Transwoman, ADHD, BPD, Pro-Palestine, LGBTQMP+ , Goddess/Fairy"
 
media_G02jmj_WcAA28fh.webp
 
When that stupid attention seeking old motherfucker got taken into custody I swear to God I thought he was working in tandem with the kid. Screaming about how he was the shooter so the cops would take him so that the kid could make the getaway. I'm not going to lie I was actually terrified that this kid wasn't going to get caught. They need to charge the attention whoring old man with felony obstruction at least.
You want to know something crazy? Fucker seems to has a history of this shit. https://x.com/RyanMattaMedia/status/1966604241096835580?t=Dq74WxhxktxMZvLUx-zvmA&s=19


George Zinn was involved in 9/11 witness ceremonies and apparently called in a fake bomb threat before the Boston Marathon bombings.



Although there's some contradictory info here that he was just some other crazy dude with the same name.

Hard to parse though all this shit. I gotta get to bed so I'll leave you fine gents to it.

They 100% do I'd bet my house on it. I've worked in enterprise data architecture for over a decade. Discord will cooperate as its a corporate entity and their lawyers will unanimously agree it is in their best interest to do so.

End users can't delete anything for real in Discord. Not a chance.
Oh yeah. That data is not going anywhere. So even if they delete shit as long as we have a link...

They can't hide from the po po
 
The "rugged individualism" never goes to the same lengths that leftist individualism goes to
Leftists aren't individualists though, they are social collectivists through and through.

I mean maybe you had some Yosemite hippies back in the day, and maybe maybe maybe the rare unicorn libleft Jesse Ventura fan is out there. But by far and large leftoids are the ones who need a "society" to function.

It's even moreso now with the left's doubling-down on gendershit.
If the left were truly remotely individualistic they wouldn't care if we acknowledge their heckin true & honest gender. They would just have their self-identity and be done with it. Instead, they are social insects and they need others to join in on the delusions.

I could apply economic and legal arguments here, too.
Hmm, it's interesting that it's at 96% yes, but most of the comments are for no.

If anyone needed proof of left wing astroturfing, there it is. Also, the amount of salt about it is hilarious.
I still remember the absolute smug from Kamala fans swarming Polymarket in force, then the absolute cope and denial on November 6th.

I find it problematic that this is happening. Taking joy for his death is disgusting and to me unethical but it's not illegal and making it illegal is problematic.

It doesn't mean people can't complain and employers can use discretion on firing but to target people to me is disturbing.

Justice is done by punishing the criminal. Move on with life. Let God deal with these people in the afterlife if you believe in that sort of stuff.

People should be smarter with their social media but they are stupid. Be joyful about his death in private. Like all perverts, keep that shit to yourself.
I agree making it illegal is 100% bad.

I'm split on the "call their employers". In a vacuum, I'd say its bad, and de-facto suppression of Free Speech.
In practice, the left set these rules of engagement and made up the whole "not free from the consequences" mantra. If they hadn't spent the last 6 years getting people fired for social media posts over asinine shit, then they probably wouldn't be having to face e-Judgement Day for their Charlie Kirk gravedancing posts.
 
If the site publicly shows home addresses or other personal information, I believe that can be legally questionable. If it is just the names and a picture or two from their social media, then it should be fine.
Name address and phone number are public information. Anything else like usernames and email addresses that are obtained by legal means are legal to post.
You ever heard of a fucking phonebook? It lists everyone in town's address.

This site has been around for like 13 years now and is KNOWN for posting that sort of thing. We've got adversaries trying to take us down pretty much constantly. If you couldn't post someone's home address legally, we'd have been fucked years ago.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo