except we know for a fact that he DID snitch. that's kind of the point. giuffre and her lawyers confirmed trump worked directly with them on epstein's conviction things. i'm not sure why you would say that i watch fox news. fox news is of the opinion that trump's a low down dirty pedophile. that wouldn't line up with my thought that i'd like to see some evidence of it first.
also, i've never heard the term 'he didn't bark' as a term for he didn't say anything. i've heard it used in the same term, however, as someone not biting. i've heard that many times. dogs bark at things they want to go to get, to go after, to go for. trump not barking means he did not want to go for any of those women. also, it's kind of a retarded thing to say that trump was the only one who DID keep quiet, considering how prosecutors talked about the massive pain in the ass that it was to get anyone to cooperate on epstein... except trump.
you still didn't answer the question of why the democrats redacted a known accuser's name, one who said she never wanted her name redacted, and tried to imply that Trump was doing something with her when she herself said he never did. Why did they use redactions for that, Hulkster?
and in case your gay boomer eyes miss it, i'm asking you why they did something THEY DID, not blaming them for other things. the house democrats knowingly did this action, and chose to take it; WHY DID THE DEMOCRATS REDACT THE NAME OF A VICTIM WHO DID NOT WANT HER NAME REDACTED, IN AN EMAIL THAT OTHERWISE PROVES TRUMP'S INNOCENCE?
