US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
The problem is you have to actually study the Bible to get the proper lessons from it. I spoke to a lifelong church goer recently who said their core principle they took from the Bible is "love God and love your neighbor".
Out of all the things there is in the Bible, a text that's incredibly layered, complex, and studded with genuinely useful advice and guidance all they got from it was "love God and love your neighbor". And they've been attending church every Sunday for 50 years.

Genuinely baffled me. Of course they're also an NPR listening drone who get genuinely upset when people support Trump. Their entire life principles that shape who they are is just "don't be mean" don't even appear to be mean. Because that's not loving your neighbor.

No idea what the fuck they're teaching in normie churches these days but it sure as shit isn't what the Bible actually says.
they teach the kind of thing that leads to people unironically saying that Jesus "materialized in jerusalem, and that's illegal immigration too," or those pictures of twitter retards saying "they would've told jesus to just comply." of course, if they read the bible, even just the new testament, they'd know that. as we've had a bit of discussion about before (the thread, not you and i) we've seen that churches of the liberal persuasion tend to focus on the peace and love messages while ignoring the parts that talk about how god razed baby rapers like the canaanites, or gave his blessing for an entire fortress to be slaughtered while it slept.

the teachings of the Lord are no longer with many, MANY american christians. instead, replaced by the teachings of pastors who've never so much as read the old testament all the way through.
1768848458787.png
ignore that it was jews who clamored for jesus's death after pontius pilate found him to have committed no crimes.

[fatpacks yapping]
fatpacks and the hulkster in the thread at the same time? i can't take the liberal dooming! i'm going to explode!

Or we could just wait til the appeal is done and then get all of the pedos?
massie should have never put a caveat for things that were allowed to be censored in any of the documents if people didn't want censorship. the fact that he did, alongside ro khanna, is why you have this problem now. massie knew none of the dems would ever accept an unredacted document, and has been coasting on the idea that one of the redacted names is definitely trump, but with zero evidence. also, why hasn't he come out and read that list of his on the house floor? he was so gun-sure of that, so POSITIVE that would make a difference, that he held a gay press conference with a bunch of young women he definitely wasn't trying to fuck now that his wife was dead.

they still haven't released that list either, despite threatening to do so constantly. massie still hasn't done any of the processes to get bondi removed. nothing. it's all a bunch of theater to keep people like you occupied on things that don't matter while niggers burn your fucking cities to the ground, hulkster. please stop being a liberal some day.
 
"this Department of Justice will remain mobilized to prosecute federal crimes"

REMAIN mobilized? Bitch, What are you talking about? I have yet to see any significant mobilization.
Who do you think is filing the charges against the people ICE arrests? What department do you think the FBI agents are from?
 
Honestly with German troops pulling out of Greenland, I get the feeling the deal has already been agreed and we're in the backtracking stage.

Because Gerrmans pulling out would suggest one of two things:
  1. The US is about to attack/invade Greenland ASAP.
  2. Greenland has already agreed, therefore no point in political posturing.
It can't be 1 as the entire fucking POINT of German troops in Greenland was to apparently "defend" them, you can't "defend" it if you're already retreated. Therefore it looks like the deal is done.
 
Segregate the schools and destroy the teachers’ unions to fix education.

As a strong proponent of organized labor I still say public sector unions are total bullshit. Nowhere is this more evident than in teachers' unions. I don't even dislike teachers they are rather important to society but teachers' unions are a fucking plague upon education.

Segregation because the retarded children shouldn't be allowed to hold back the children that aren't predestined for failure. The disruptive kids can all be dumped with the illiterate spawn of illegals who despite being born in America don't speak a word of English.

Also teach kids cool shit. History for example should be about fun and important events in the past. Romans are pretty cool and the Emperor Antoninus Pius introduced the concept of innocence until proven guilty which persists as a core tenant in American-European (lmao) values to this day. No one wants endless fucking crying over 19th century slavery and 18th century Indian clearances every single grade.
 
Honestly with German troops pulling out of Greenland, I get the feeling the deal has already been agreed and we're in the backtracking stage.

Because Gerrmans pulling out would suggest one of two things:
  1. The US is about to attack/invade Greenland ASAP.
  2. Greenland has already agreed, therefore no point in political posturing.
It can't be 1 as the entire fucking POINT of German troops in Greenland was to apparently "defend" them, you can't "defend" it if you're already retreated. Therefore it looks like the deal is done.
Greenland can barely call itself a sovereign nation. The EU is not going to spend resources fighting for a hunk of land permanently attached to North America. The tariffs will probably stick and America-EU relations will remain sour, which other than making stuff more expensive for Americans probably won't be a huge loss since Europe's a caliphate nowadays.
 
massie should have never put a caveat for things that were allowed to be censored in any of the documents if people didn't want censorship. the fact that he did, alongside ro khanna, is why you have this problem now. massie knew none of the dems would ever accept an unredacted document, and has been coasting on the idea that one of the redacted names is definitely trump, but with zero evidence. also, why hasn't he come out and read that list of his on the house floor? he was so gun-sure of that, so POSITIVE that would make a difference, that he held a gay press conference with a bunch of young women he definitely wasn't trying to fuck now that his wife was dead.

they still haven't released that list either, despite threatening to do so constantly. massie still hasn't done any of the processes to get bondi removed. nothing. it's all a bunch of theater to keep people like you occupied on things that don't matter while niggers burn your fucking cities to the ground, hulkster. please stop being a liberal some day.
lol at thinking the Dems were the ones who wanted it redacted. Who are the ones redacting it now? Oh, right, Trump's DOJ. The DOJ even said they were going to redact and Republicans in the files. Yet you still blame Dems for that like a good little Fox News watching MAGAloid boomer
 
I'd put someone actually qualified to lead the Department of Education in charge and be willing to spend more money on education, even if it means billionaires have to pay more in taxes. That way we wouldn't have to import Indian people to work at tech companies and could hire Americans.

Oh, is that why Bill Clinton opened the floodgates to India? Because their education system was just so much better than anything he and Richard Riley could pull off? Tell me more about why the Clinton administration's piss-poor policy led to Americans having the worst engineers in the world, and give me some examples of how much better Indians are than us at engineering.
 
So the VA democrats are going warp speed to Minnesota/California.
This account has been posting many of the democrat proposed bills

Way to many to post pictures, Trying to organize. This isn't all, but it's most.

School/daycare monies
Voting
Taxes
Guns
Crime
Environment
Other
 
Última edición:
lol at thinking the Dems were the ones who wanted it redacted. Who are the ones redacting it now? Oh, right, Trump's DOJ. The DOJ even said they were going to redact and Republicans in the files. Yet you still blame Dems for that like a good little Fox News watching MAGAloid boomer
ro khanna had to approve the bill, hulkster. it was co-sponsored by ro. the entire 'redactions' section is written according to democrat requests for the names being censored. i was always of the opinion that no one involved should be censored because it runs risks like this. you just assuming my beliefs is pretty retarded considering you've seen me in the thread pushing back on narratives plenty, i know you still read the thread. ro khanna and house/senate dems could've always voted no and pushed for a more uncensored bill, but they consistently requested those redactions be put in place so that 'the victims and innocent people' would not have their names associated with it. so far, you have not managed to actually show any documents that are clearly trump even though the name is censored, you just make the accusation.

which documents showing wrongdoing do you believe have trump's name on them but it's redacted, hulkster? why did the emails from Jeff say they had nothing on him? why was bannon still trying to get dirt on him in 2018? why was michael wolff trying to get dirt on him? Why did NONE of those attempts to get dirt on him by or from epstein have any effect at all, why did virginia giuffre and her legal team insist trump had been the most helpful by far?

why did the house democrats redact giuffre's name from the emails when they weren't redacted in the original documentation? this is one i really want you to answer. why did the democrats seek to redact a name to imply something about trump, when they KNEW that giuffre was open and on record that she had never seen anything done, or had anything done to her by trump. the answer is obvious of course, so if you give us bullshit everyone will see yet again that you have no intent of engaging in a legitimate way even with people who have no ill will toward you.

So the VA democrats are going warp speed to Minnesota/California.
virginia is about to become unlivable. wow! congratulations, democrats, you've ruined another state. at least it's a shithole fed state like virginia, and not a good state like... well, i guess maybe oklahoma is still pretty nice.
 
ro khanna had to approve the bill, hulkster. it was co-sponsored by ro. the entire 'redactions' section is written according to democrat requests for the names being censored. i was always of the opinion that no one involved should be censored because it runs risks like this. you just assuming my beliefs is pretty retarded considering you've seen me in the thread pushing back on narratives plenty, i know you still read the thread. ro khanna and house/senate dems could've always voted no and pushed for a more uncensored bill, but they consistently requested those redactions be put in place so that 'the victims and innocent people' would not have their names associated with it. so far, you have not managed to actually show any documents that are clearly trump even though the name is censored, you just make the accusation.

which documents showing wrongdoing do you believe have trump's name on them but it's redacted, hulkster? why did the emails from Jeff say they had nothing on him? why was bannon still trying to get dirt on him in 2018? why was michael wolff trying to get dirt on him? Why did NONE of those attempts to get dirt on him by or from epstein have any effect at all, why did virginia giuffre and her legal team insist trump had been the most helpful by far?

why did the house democrats redact giuffre's name from the emails when they weren't redacted in the original documentation?
The documents said Trump didn't bark, which means he didn't snitch. And as I've said a dozen times in this thread, Trump has been threatening Republicans who vote to release files and has instructed the DOJ to do all they can to NOT release the files. This means, at a minimum, he is protecting the pedophiles in the Epstein files. Why do you not have a problem with this and are instead blaming the Dems?

Again, I get it, you're a good little Fox News watching MAGAloid boomer so you blame the Democrats for everything bad in your life, but Trump is the one blocking the release. Not the Democrats.
 
the teachings of the Lord are no longer with many, MANY american christians. instead, replaced by the teachings of pastors who've never so much as read the old testament all the way through.
1768848458787.png
ignore that it was jews who clamored for jesus's death after pontius pilate found him to have committed no crimes.
He did comply.
He was destined to die because of every soul that has ever existed or will exist are in sin. .
He rose again and defied death.
 
Look, Ma! I'm swallowing hulkbait, too! "When in RomeThunderdome..."
lol at thinking the Dems were the ones who wanted it redacted. Who are the ones redacting it now? Oh, right, Trump's DOJ. The DOJ even said they were going to redact and Republicans in the files. Yet you still blame Dems for that like a good little Fox News watching MAGAloid boomer

It'd be nice to see the unredacted files so we could see who the pedos are so they can face justice
Well, at least you guys aren't just outright dismissing them as a "nothingburger," anymore... That's an...improvement, I guess?

Funny how progress sometimes comes so slowly from the Progressives. Baby steps.
 
The documents said Trump didn't bark, which means he didn't snitch. And as I've said a dozen times in this thread, Trump has been threatening Republicans who vote to release files and has instructed the DOJ to do all they can to NOT release the files. This means, at a minimum, he is protecting the pedophiles in the Epstein files. Why do you not have a problem with this and are instead blaming the Dems?
The bark slang means to bark on command, or to react in an expected way to some event. So saying he didn't bark meant that he did not respond to their attempts to get him to join the kiddy diddly committee

Intolerable+memorable+thundering_72dd17_12969754.jpg
 
The bark slang means to bark on command, or to react in an expected way to some event. So saying he didn't bark meant that he did not respond to their attempts to get him to join the kiddy diddly committee

Ver archivo adjunto 8446313

So instead of one damaged helo two might have the paint scratched. Scary.
 
Look, Ma! I'm swallowing hulkbait, too! "When in RomeThunderdome..."



Well, at least you guys aren't just outright dismissing them as a "nothingburger," anymore... That's an...improvement, I guess?

Funny how progress sometimes comes so slowly from the Progressives. Baby steps.
It's hilarious that you went from "pedos deserve the rope" to "Epstein files don't matter and pedophiles are totally fine" all on the whims of a pants-shitting, mushbrained fat ass
 
Apparently trump wrote this letter to Norway, seems extremely fake and gay to me and i'm only seeing reddit and lefty MSM push it with all the usual comments "i used to support trump but now I don't"

Any news on this? I imagine fake but nowhere is confirming and i don't have time to look into it.

pxvyy14r1ceg1.jpg
 
Atrás
Top Abajo