Phil always wants things both ways.
Ver archivo adjunto 7531624
Phil - "I make most of my income on direct contributions from streams, because ad revenue is like pennies now"
Also Phil - "Entire channels make bank stealing my broadcasts", as in they steal ad revenue from his content getting less views
He can't have it both ways. Memology gets 1M views on edited videos. Snort Burnell gets about 200K. Even WPIG only gets about 200K. By definition, Phil, who gets double most detractors views, is making pennies on ad revenue, so they're making even less right? Even Raw Phil privates everything after a day so they're not making ad revenue either.
And yes I'm not including money taken on a stream, which again Phil can't claim would have gone to him, as it's money to make fun of him or laugh at him. That would be like Donald Trump saying he's entitled to any money anybody makes for laughing at videos of him. They're 2 very different things.
Considering this year might be boring, I really do hope we get LegalSydePhil and somebody gets in his ear to convince him to sue somebody. The countersuit or even pushback to that would be so hilarious.