- Registrado
- 8 de Feb, 2022
A couple things to keep in mind bfore I give my take. First, I may be a but biased as my trainer is one of the folks who helped coin, or at least popularise the term "powerbuilding" at least in the context of youtube. Second, I've only been lifting for about 6 months and am by no means an expert.What do we think of the "Powerbuilding is an abomination" thing covered by Natural Hypertrophy and responded to by Bald Omni Man, Steve Shaw, Geoff Schofield, Basement Bodybuilding, etc?
It seems to me that very few people who get into lifting weights are going to slavishly or exclusively adhere to either a powerlifting or bodybuilding regime. Most folks who get into lifting weights would like to be bigger, stronger, and to have a more appealing physique, but I think only a small percentage of those people want to either build size and strength without an asthetic component, or to focus strictly on creating the bodybuilding asthetic.
Myself for example, I certainly want to gain strength and mass, but I would also like to look better when I take my shirt off, even if I have no interest in having a six pack.
It would seem to me that for the vast majority of people a training approach which strikes a happy medium between pure strength training, and pure hypertrophy is going to be the most likely to help the achieve thier goals.
The program Im on for example mixes relatively low rep range work (5-7 reps) on the major compund lifts for the first set, followed by progressively higher rep ranges at lower weights on the following sets, along with higher rep range sets on the various accessory lifts, and an overall fairly high volume of sets on a weekly basis.
Again, this is the program my own trainer has devised and while I recognise its not optimised for either strength or an increase in muscle size, Im happy enough with the results thus far that I dont feel a need to change it.