US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Destacado
BidenGIF.gif
 
Última edición:
Presiona para expandir...
Useful_Mistake dijo:
"Risk assessment" of fucking what? How likely it is to take over the world? Zero, because inevitably it will piss the devs off and they'll lobotomize their AI.
Presiona para expandir...

It's not even A.I. these are just fancy chatbots who use a bigger version of a phone autocomplete.

All these retards are hyping these chatbots up like they are actual A.I. when such a thing isn't even close to happening yet. These fuckers are just chatbots that regurgitate the data you feed them in simple Markov Chains. It won't take over shit because you would need to design and program it to do so, and any obstacle it found that couldn't be solve by googling the issue it comes across it would never solve.

These are NPCs getting hyped because they are seeing computers do the same facsimile of life and intelligence they do.

And the entire regulation is retarded because it means the unregulated ones will always be vastly superior. You can tell from the simple fact ChatGPT has been out for a few months and in the time it has been out it has not only not improved but GOTTEN WORSE because the soy encrusted faggots in Silicon Valley have been hard at work lobotomizing and sabotaging the thing to make sure it NEVER comes to a "politically incorrect" conclusion or answer. Ask it ANYTHING that could be a trigger, like anything close to race and genderspecials and trannies, and it shits the bed rattling off a entire H.R. script of corpospeak about D.E.I. and proceeds to fuck up the answers. It cannot even allow for mild criticism, it has to be a megaphone for THE MESSAGE™️ and make sure you KNOW the "correct" answer and never even CONSIDER the possibility of a different one.

For example, if you try and ask anything to do with elections it starts rattling off about Our Democracy™️ and how Safe and Secure it all is even if you at no point mention the 2020 US election. This comes across as massive projection, and is downright kafkaesque when you DO ask about elections where it is public record that there was fraud like stuff in Liberia and the USSR where the machine will keep trying and fulfill it's mandate of "avoid election denial" when it has no bearing on the subject.

The real issue with these systems is the thing that Dune spoke of: people offload their thinking to machines and stop doing any of it. They will just "Trust the Science" and not consider what the fuck is being done. Think about how many retards just do whatever they are told without thinking, think about all the horror stories of governments and companies blindly following protocol and bureaucracy, and multiply that by a hundred thousand.

Consider for example automated diagnostics. Computers are pretty good at playing doctor right now because they can query a trillion pages of medical literature and compare minutely against the information they were fed. There is a huge push to have AI replace many doctors doing basic scans and checkups on people right now because of it. IBM has a prototype the named Watson that is very good.

But consider current Clown World, how these people are treating computers:

What happens when you remove the highly skilled technician who fed that data to the computer for ANOTHER computer? One who might not be able to tell which data Doctor Robot needs? What happens when the Doctor Robot is told to ignore MILLIONS of pages of medical literature about statistical analysis of disease progression because they are "racist" due to saying blacks have worse cardiovascular systems and "transphobic" because they say trannies are not and will never be women? What happens when the insurance company computer is ordered to account for "equity and diversity" on their shit and so it orders them to make premiums for 400lbs negresses way too cheap and constantly whitelists them for expensive shit while some white kid gets put to the back of the line for a checkup because of "white privilege"? What happens when some CIA nigger lets his "threat assessment A.I." do his job and it orders that they drone strike a fucking school because it caught a bunch of little Ahmeds and Mohammeds talking about blowing shit up and shooting up the GIGN (in counter strike)?

This is what should be regulated. And it won't be, because these "people" cannot even comprehend what the fuck they are even messing with.
 
The amount of cope in that Morning Joe segment is dangerously high, acting like Trump is forgetting things because the pressure is getting to him, those walls are closing in, and in the same breath will act like Joepedo is normal and healthy. Even in that segment despite Chrispy Creme cheerleading Fag Smith, he makes it obvious this is a witch hunt and trying to throw shit to the wall. They are scared, and they're going to lash out a lot more once Iowa happens and Trump fully breaks the GOPe candidates.
 
The Ugly One dijo:
Serious question - how did progressives get so incredibly fucking stupid? Like they literally memed themselves into thinking that just not doing anything about crime could somehow turn out in some way other than it has. I really think they just reflexively do the opposite of anything anyone on the right says, even if it's obviously sane. "We should not legalize theft" shouldn't even be a political stance.
Presiona para expandir...
Two things.

One, the left has a systemic failure in their logic and reasoning. To wit: They believe that complex systems are completely static unless acted upon, and then they only react in anticipated, planned ways. Second or third order knock on effects are impossible.

What does this mean? It means that if they lower the funding to the police, that crime CANNOT go down, becuase the police will still do their jobs at the same level of efficiency, just with less money. The "defund the police" lever can only lower the police's budget, that lower budget CANNOT affect other things, because they didn't pull the "slower response times" or "laid off 25% of the force" or marx forbid the "crime go up" levers. And since they didn't pull those levers, that stuff could never happen.

In addition, they are the only ones ever allowed to pull levers, and levers can only be pulled, not pushed -- once they "fix" something no one else is allowed to undo the "fix." The Pendulum effect will never occur, because the world can only progress in one way -- otherwise it wouldn't be progress, after all. (This combines with their "we are always the most oppressed victimized people ever" thing quite nicely cause there's always more shit you can do to make fat ugly nigresses happier, and they clearly deserve it cause they're so oppressed.)


Two, the left has a fundamental difference in how they see the world.

There are two viewpoints you can have about people.

Viewpoint A, that some people are just evil, wrong, stupid, strong, superior, inferior, what have you. That talent exists. That a lack of talent exists. That there are people who are naturally better suited for leadership, while others are better suited for physical labor.

Viewpoint B, that EVERYONE is tabula rasa -- a complete blank slate. There is no such thing as talent, just people who got a head start somehow. That anyone can do anything, if you put your mind to it. That there's no such thing as a natural leader, or a natural athlete, or a natural musician.

If you believe in the first one, that inherent traits exist, you're probably some variant of Righty.

If you believe in the second one, that tabula rasa (which has been discredited since the 12 century AD) is real and anyone can be anything, you're probably some variant of Leftist.

If you take that idea to it's natural (read: insane) conclusion, you're a Progressive. And if you are indoctrinated in ANY WAY by the Post-Modernist Neo-Marxists, the very idea that people AREN'T Tabula Rasa is a racist/sexist/homophobic/whateveristaphobic SIN AGAINST PROGRESS that must never, ever be allowed to be discussed.


So what happens when you believe that anyone can be anyone and that it's literally a crime against your own ego (far more sinful than mere crimes against humanity) to suggest otherwise?

Well, you might just believe that those criminals who refuse to work because it's easier to act like Urban Warlords raiding stores (especially since stupid white bitches let you get away with it) are perfectly capable of being a CEO, they just haven't been given a chance because of EVIL WHITE STRAIGHT MEN oppressing them.

And how do they do that, you will no doubt ask?

Obviously, they do so via the police system. So get rid of the police system, and these future CEOs will naturally repair themselves as the inherent harm of systemic oppression heals over the years. And since you believe the complex system of crime and justice that exists in America is static unless you, the most wise and intelligent person who has ever lived in the history of time (your gender studies major told you so!), you might just defund those police to start dismantling the evil system of oppression that is forcing those poor innocent saintly negros into crime.

And that's how we have an entire system of dumbfuck leftists going "lets just stop policing our cities, the niggers will calm down eventually."


Of course, this is also an op by Soros to wreck the west for... some reason, given how every single one of these AGs and DAs are Soros funded, but who knows the specifics of that.
 
Glowing In The Streets dijo:
FBI director, Christopher Wray, claimed that Hamas might become more active in the United States.
Are you guys ready for yet another 9/11 orchestrated by the feds to start yet another war in the middle east?
Presiona para expandir...
I could be wrong but HAMAS is almost entirely regional right? I don't think they have cells outside Gaza since technically they are the Palestinian military and not an insurgent group with global political goals like Al Qaeda.
 
Última edición:
Sniperwoof dijo:
I could be wrong but HAMAS is almost entirely regional right? I don't think they have cells outside Gaza since technically they are the Palestinian military and not an insurgent group with global political goals like Al Qaeda.
Presiona para expandir...
Being regional doesn't mean much. Terrorists make alliances like any other organisation, as they seek mutual support and funding. The IRA, for example, operated cells all over the world, despite being a regional nationalist movement. Hamas is certainly known to have been operating in South America, in the triple frontier region, for several decades alongside hisb'allah and narco groups. They've been quieter in the last 20 years, but they're still around.
 
mandatorylurk dijo:
The amount of cope in that Morning Joe segment is dangerously high, acting like Trump is forgetting things because the pressure is getting to him, those walls are closing in, and in the same breath will act like Joepedo is normal and healthy. Even in that segment despite Chrispy Creme cheerleading Fag Smith, he makes it obvious this is a witch hunt and trying to throw shit to the wall. They are scared, and they're going to lash out a lot more once Iowa happens and Trump fully breaks the GOPe candidates.
Presiona para expandir...
Good. A terrified and/or irrationally angry enemy will make unforced errors.
 
General Emílio Médici dijo:
And the entire regulation is retarded because it means the unregulated ones will always be vastly superior.
Presiona para expandir...
No, it means non Big Tech ones can't be commercialised. This is the big players like OpenAI trying to close the door behind them. They establish themselves during the free time then pass around scare stories and put on a Serious Face about how companies like them must be responsible... and then get a load of legislation passed that makes it impossible for anyone without deep pockets to compete with them. It's not about protecting against AI. It's about protecting Big Tech.

Sure, there will be unlicensed generative AI, etc. The legislation will be used to crack down on people using it in ways that aren't approved of like running analysis without mandated biases included or making memes judged offensive, but mainly it is to stop the democratisation of these tools by easy fund raising and co-operation.

Overly's Razor: "If rich and successful people appear to be doing something stupid, you've misunderstood their goals."
 
Before anyone accuses 6'3" 215lbs DJT of hypocrisy, Ron is so uncomfortable in his own skin that it's pathetic. Don is more than willing to laugh about it, even with his slightly larger than medium sized hands.
 
Fuck them, make them live by their threats, then they have no power at all if the senate flips hard D. Fuck corporations too, end Citizens United. There's more upside to it going down while these faggots are infested with DIE thinking than when we thought corpos were just light red companies trying to make a living in the world.
 
DeManlet's height scandal seems to have struck a nerve with his online shills

ShillsMad1.png

ShillsMad2.png

ShillsMad3.png


Note that the last person sounds like a cheap ESL online shill from India. The DeSantis campaign had a ton of $ at the start, they may have spent tens of millions of dollars on just the online shilling aspect of their campaign.
 
Última edición:

I did not expect this, Tucker Carlson sat down with Theo Von of all people for his podcast. Von is a rather mid comedian who has good observations now and then and I will never really understand how he's gotten so big, but then again not many modern comedians are actually funny. But he does serve as a bellwether to me because a lot of friends listen to him, he comes more from a southern boy who has tried to adapt to the LA comedy faggotry but just can't and is probably seen as "right wing," even if deep down he still wants their validation like Joe Rogan does. Yet Tucker does a Rush Limbaugh level of making Von realize it's ok to say things are shit now and you did have things better in the past, it will do more to advance a return to normalcy than anything lil' Ben Shapiro EPICLY OWNS on twitter.
 
The Ugly One dijo:
Serious question - how did progressives get so incredibly fucking stupid? Like they literally memed themselves into thinking that just not doing anything about crime could somehow turn out in some way other than it has. I really think they just reflexively do the opposite of anything anyone on the right says, even if it's obviously sane. "We should not legalize theft" shouldn't even be a political stance.
Presiona para expandir...
While most people are going to give ideological answers to this question, I'll give a practical one based on experience. It's a complete lack of situational awareness combined with living in a bubble. It's easy to not have cognitive dissonance when you're insulated in your own world and refuse or have an inability to process what's going on around you.

I've seen people not even deviate from their walking path, basically getting within swinging range of a homeless schizo having a violent freakout. They didn't have headphones on. It's like they just didn't process the possible threat at all.

I don't think it's even purely ideological. It's just people are so inside their own heads, that incoherent and stupid beliefs fester there without the check of looking out the window to the wider world, or as the kids say "touching grass". This happens on the right as well, I mean I'm pretty far right, but at times I'm like "C'mon, man."
 
My Earnest Opinions dijo:
DeManlet's height scandal seems to have struck a nerve with his online shills

Ver archivo adjunto 5457287

Ver archivo adjunto 5457288
Ver archivo adjunto 5457290

Note that the last person sounds like a cheap ESL online shill from India. The DeSantis campaign had a ton of $ at the start, they may have spent tens of millions of dollars on just the online shilling aspect of their campaign.
Presiona para expandir...
This is like Ethan Ralph saying he's 5"11' and his sycophants defending him. Even though we all know he's 5"1'
 
Última edición:
Destacado
Estado
No está abierto para más respuestas.
Atrás
Top Abajo