US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Amazing its happened at all. Yeah it's not full auto and I've seen bitching, but it's still a M14. They never were good in full auto. Now you just gotta get them before the boomers jack up the price.
Have you seen how the CMP acts in recent years? They have a gunbroker page and I’m sure that’s where the M14s will be listed.
 
But if you ask German they would say the opposite, even though German Jews were heavily involved in the state and heavily involved in fighting for the state.
more involved in fighting against the state though.
most of the nazis rabid hate for the jews was a direct reaction to seeing jews at the forefront of every (attempted or successful) marxist revolution in the WW1 years. part of this came from white russians who were in exile in germany, part came from witnessing first hand the attempted spartacus uprising in germany itself.

italy (to my knowledge) did not experience such tribulations after the war, so it makes sense that there was no such anti jewish backlash in italian fascism as there was in germany.
 
The funniest thing to me about modern Communists is how "fascism" is their boogeyman despite functionally resulting in the same thing

In Fascism, the corporations overtake the government, becoming a corporatocracy of a merged government and corporations
In Socialism, the government overtakes the corporations, becoming a corporatocracy of a merged government and corporations

They dress up in different ideology and messaging, but ultimately boil down to being the same; absolute power corrupts absolutely and the heads of these types of states become the same people in the end
The word "corporazione" in Mussolini's Doctrine of Fascism should be translated as "trade unions." It's mistranslated as "corporations" because the translators are all leftists and want to make the post-WWII Western countries out to be fascist-adjacent.
 
Missouri has eliminating state income tax on the ballot in August.
1785156958273.png
Why did they have to tie it to a property tax “reform” that bans cutting school funding?

Public schools are facing a demographic crisis in many areas where there just aren’t enough kids to justify keeping schools open and teachers employed. Their funding will have to be cut in the future.

Missouri is one of the reddest states in the country. Why are they still bought off by the teacher’s union? A similar thing happened in Florida where their property tax repeal was watered down to be an increase in the homestead exemption for non-school taxes.
 
Última edición:
That’s the fake socialist definition of fascism that they created to distance their ideology from the Holocaust. In reality, fascism is just another name for socialism where the government overtakes the corporations; it was not a corporatocracy.

Mussolini described fascism as “Everything in the State, nothing outside the State, nothing against the State”. Does that sound like a government ruled by corporations to you?
You can play games with the words but Fascism doesn't have a unitary economic system. Austria and Romania did not share corporatism.
And instead of using simple quotes the actual system in Fascist Italy was what is commonly translated as corporatism. Trade Unions, except those managed by the state were outlawed and the state acted as a mediatory between the workers and the corporations with the union leaders being appointed by the government. Fascism never banned private property or companies or corporations or stocks or secured the means of production.
 
Is it illegal to show up to a teachers union meeting dressed like Sherlock Holmes and be like:

"Hmm~ Yes, after my investigation, I have determined that indeed, you all.... are bitter and hate your job... BECAUSE OF NIGGERS! FACE IT! NIGGERS WILL ALWAYS HATE AND FAIL YOU! CASE CONCLUDED!" - Only to then proceed ripping off your pants and goatse the entire meeting while laughing manically?
 
Is it illegal to show up to a teachers union meeting dressed like Sherlock Holmes and be like:

"Hmm~ Yes, after my investigation, I have determined that indeed, you all.... are bitter and hate your job... BECAUSE OF NIGGERS! FACE IT! NIGGERS WILL ALWAYS HATE AND FAIL YOU! CASE CONCLUDED!" - Only to then proceed ripping off your pants and goatse the entire meeting while laughing manically?
Probably is illegal. Nanny state bullshit impo.

He ran out of other movies
Tarantino needs to convince Roger Avary to write more scripts for him to take credit for.
 
Missouri is one of the reddest states in the country. Why are they still bought off by the teacher’s union?
"School" and "teacher" are words that cause goodfeels in 95% of voters, so if you appear to be on their bad side, you might as well also say you hate puppies, God, and the Declaration of Independence.
 
Tell me, what's worse, when some skitzo faggot like brad is getting almost 2 million dollars a month to use american radio to beam this shit into people's heads or when someone like alex might or might not have been paid by qatar speaks at some qatar conference in doha?? does that seem like the same fucking thing to you??
Brad has filed everything publicly under FARA where Alex has not and Alex keeps claiming he's doing all this Qatar shit out of the goodness of his heart:

1785159591275.png


Parscale filed paperwork with the Foreign Agents Registration Act saying he began work for the Israeli government on Sept. 18. He registered a company called Clocktower X LLC and is primarily corresponding with Israel’s minister of Foreign Affairs and Eran Shayovich, listed as chief of staff at Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, according to his LinkedIn.

Parscale’s contract was first reported by the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft, a Washington-based think tank that advocates for restraint in foreign policy.

According to Parscale’s contract, his company is hired to create content where at least 80 percent “is tailored to Gen Z audiences across platforms, including TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, podcasts, and other relevant digital and broadcast outlets.”

The contract also states that “Agency shall provide strategic communications, planning, and media services in support of Client’s engagement by the State of Israel to develop and execute a nationwide campaign in the United States to combat antisemitism.”

as that Eitan guy points out:


Alex, it's unbelievably transparent.

Take the supplemental filing from May 18, 2026, for example. It has a 28 page list with itemized spending rows.

On Salem, the filing backs up the contract language with a real dollar trail. It itemizes three separate "Advertising" payments to Salem Media Representatives, Inc, adding up to $250K+ in what I've checked so far.

Add the dated, linked log of the actual content produced, with individual URLs across http://paxpoint.org, http://justorium.org, http://factsignal.org, http://allyvia.org, and others, plus video. This is a level of disclosure most FARA registrants don't come close to.

I still haven't seen you engage the bot farm cost comparison, AJ+'s FARA status, or the actual point, which is that the one registrant volunteering this level of detail is the one getting hammered, while everyone operating with zero disclosure gets a pass.

Will you be engaging with my arguments? Why are you ignoring them?

1785159642083.png
1785159647886.png
1785159675388.png

Vance lied about this, pointing to a TIME article and claiming this was a secret operation to undermine him when none of the content talked about the MOU.


Vance told Joe Rogan in a podcast released yesterday that a Time article proves there was a foreign funded campaign to “tank the very deal (MOU) I was pursuing.”

VP Vance to Rogan: “I definitely think you have seen this very discreet, extremely well funded campaign to try to derail the negotiation and try to derail the deal.”

I read the Time article. Here’s what it actually says versus what Vance claims it proves.

Some background on how we got here:

Step 1: When discussing the MOU, Vance said: “We are seeing both Iranian hardliners and political leaders saying, ‘Our relationship with the U.S. over the past 47 years has been a mistake. Let’s turn over a new leaf.’”

After the MOU was made public, many people online criticized it, citing the proposed sanctions relief, the lifting of the blockade, the reported $300 billion in financial incentives for Iran, and what they viewed as a one sided agreement. Many also said they did not believe the Iranian regime had fundamentally changed after 47 years.

Step 2: An administration social media adviser concluded that the criticism appeared to be a coordinated influence campaign. That assessment was then shared with Time by an anonymous official.

Step 3: Time reported that an anonymous official suspected some of the online activity was coordinated, writing:

“After the U.S. and Iran agreed to a ceasefire deal on June 17, a senior U.S. official was monitoring the online reaction when they noticed something surprising… The official began collecting screenshots, and came to believe it wasn’t a coincidence.”

Time then pointed to a FARA registered influencer campaign launched in 2025 by Brad Parscale. However, Parscale told Time: “I have never funded, organized, or participated in any effort to undermine President Trump, ever, including his MOU or ceasefire proposal.”

Step 4: Vance cited the Time article on Joe Rogan’s podcast as proof that there was a funded campaign to derail his negotiations. The article itself does not make that conclusion. It says an anonymous official suspected such a connection.

Step 5: The same social media adviser, or the same anonymous official quoted by Time, then pointed to Vance’s interview as “alleged” proof that the criticism was a coordinated campaign.

But Vance’s claim was based on the Time article, and the Time article was based on that social media’s official’s original allegation.

The same claim went from social media official → Time → Vance → back to the social media official, and was then presented as independent “alleged” confirmation that opposition to the MOU was part of a coordinated influence campaign.

That is an information feedback loop.

A lot of people thought the MOU was a bad agreement. That is not a coordinated influence campaign. It is people expressing their opinions.

The MOU did not collapse because people criticized it. It collapsed when Iran attacked ships in the Strait of Hormuz. The regime killed the deal, not the people who questioned it.

Note that Israel registered everything via FARA while Alex and his ilk do not.

You can hate foreign lobbying and such but pretending that Alex's garbage and the Russian operations going on now are equivalent to what Parscale is doing is dishonest.
 
He ran out of other movies
Nigger revenge fantasies, girl power, and movies saved by Brad Pitt's intentionally bad acting (the hitler killing movie). This is what all mediocre director/writers go when they get rich and become completely detached from the zeitgeist that spawned them. Once Upon a Time in Hollywood was 50% too long. It was only decent because there was no girl power or nigger revenge fantasy plot and the two major stars are still at their career peaks, Leonardo Di dicaprio and Brad Pitt.
 
Is that why all of his recent movies suck cock.
Recent movies? Nigga WHAT recent movies? His most recent movie is Once Upon A Time In Hollywood. That was seven years ago, nigger. It's coming up on a decade old and quickly.

The one before that is Hateful Eight and that IS a decade old.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo