- Registrado
- 29 de Sep, 2016
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Feels good man.BREAKING NEWS TURN ON CNN
Trump wipes his butt standing up and pees with his pants all the way down!!!!
![]()
"Long ago in a distant land, I, Colbert, the shapeshifting master of comedy, unleashed an unspeakable evil. But a foolish president wielding a magic ice cream cone stepped forth to oppose me. Before the second scoop was made, I tore open a portal in time, and flung him into the future where my evil is law. Now the fool seeks to return to the past and undo the future that is Colbert."
So, uh, after talking to a an old coworker about the Trump leak, it's most likely a non-issue.
The freakout was originally by the IC that it was a SAMI leak, so they thought he listed his source in conversation to the Russian Ambassador on some sensitive data he has regarding ISIS and a few other terror factions in play on the Syria conflict, potentially selling out an ally's agent or capabilities to the Russians. The more that's coming out though is it looks like he merely shared said sensitive data without mentioning the source or addressing it in a conversation about stopping the flow of money and arms to ISIS from Iranian and Saudi sympathizers. Which, while not the best way to handle gifting info to a potential rival, certainly isn't getting any intel agents killed like Snowden, Bradley manning, Hillary's emails or Karl Rove's butt-fuckery
So, uh, after talking to a an old coworker about the Trump leak, it's most likely a non-issue.
The freakout was originally by the IC that it was a SAMI leak, so they thought he listed his source in conversation to the Russian Ambassador on some sensitive data he has regarding ISIS and a few other terror factions in play on the Syria conflict, potentially selling out an ally's agent or capabilities to the Russians. The more that's coming out though is it looks like he merely shared said sensitive data without mentioning the source or addressing it in a conversation about stopping the flow of money and arms to ISIS from Iranian and Saudi sympathizers. Which, while not the best way to handle gifting info to a potential rival, certainly isn't getting any intel agents killed like Snowden, Bradley manning, Hillary's emails or Karl Rove's butt-fuckery
Off-topic and a bit of powerleveling: What does SAMI mean? I've been in the 'IC' before and haven't a clue what that is.
Also, the myth that Manning got anyone killed is bullshit. The limited information in those logs only gave names like Abu Muhammad, Durka Hassan, etc. Every other sand nigger is named that.
For what it's worth, I grudgingly voted not liking any of the candidates (I voted for Gary Johnson because I felt he best represented my views so I don't know how much my thoughts are worth) and frankly I stopped caring about the controversies a year ago, right around the time the "Grab them by the pussy" shit became big because it seemed hypocritical to me to get angry at that when you could just as easily cherry-pick things Clinton said years ago that don't represent her now.Out of interest, how has this constant barrage of """controversies""" gone down with people who didn't vote (or grudgingly voted but didn't like either candidate)? I know in the UK people have basically stopped caring and each new event just gets a tut or maybe a "what a tit" as a response at most. Obviously this excludes committed lefties, students and particularly boring journalists who still act like exceptional individuals whenever Trump so much as speaks.
Sorry if it's slightly off topic, just curious how the average man on the street reacts to this stuff and how it differs from constant salt spewing from the media.
Out of interest, how has this constant barrage of """controversies""" gone down with people who didn't vote (or grudgingly voted but didn't like either candidate)? I know in the UK people have basically stopped caring and each new event just gets a tut or maybe a "what a tit" as a response at most. Obviously this excludes committed lefties, students and particularly boring journalists who still act like exceptional individuals whenever Trump so much as speaks.
I'm in a geographic area that tends to favor Trump, so take this for what it's worth. It seems like the people who voted Trump have gotten on with their lives, the people who didn't are patting themselves on the back and saying "Yep, we told you so." Which is basically what happens after every election, ever. To address your larger point, it does seem like each time a controversy comes out, the reaction from both sides is less and less. The Anti-Trump people post some "impeach him now" meme on social media, and the Pro-Trump people are unaware it even happened.Out of interest, how has this constant barrage of """controversies""" gone down with people who didn't vote (or grudgingly voted but didn't like either candidate)? I know in the UK people have basically stopped caring and each new event just gets a tut or maybe a "what a tit" as a response at most. Obviously this excludes committed lefties, students and particularly boring journalists who still act like exceptional individuals whenever Trump so much as speaks.
Sorry if it's slightly off topic, just curious how the average man on the street reacts to this stuff and how it differs from constant salt spewing from the media.
Out of interest, how has this constant barrage of """controversies""" gone down with people who didn't vote (or grudgingly voted but didn't like either candidate)? I know in the UK people have basically stopped caring and each new event just gets a tut or maybe a "what a tit" as a response at most. Obviously this excludes committed lefties, students and particularly boring journalists who still act like exceptional individuals whenever Trump so much as speaks.
Sorry if it's slightly off topic, just curious how the average man on the street reacts to this stuff and how it differs from constant salt spewing from the media.
And we all know which choice they're going with, and that they're just doubling down with it.The media is at the point where they can do one of two things: either they at least accept that Trump is the president and isn't going anywhere any time soon, or they can keep crying "RESIST" and lose what little credibility they have left.
Out of interest, how has this constant barrage of """controversies""" gone down with people who didn't vote (or grudgingly voted but didn't like either candidate)? I know in the UK people have basically stopped caring and each new event just gets a tut or maybe a "what a tit" as a response at most. Obviously this excludes committed lefties, students and particularly boring journalists who still act like exceptional individuals whenever Trump so much as speaks.
Sorry if it's slightly off topic, just curious how the average man on the street reacts to this stuff and how it differs from constant salt spewing from the media.