Not lowering unreasonably high standards is an age-old trap for both sexes.
Women and girls gush about male actors and celebrities the same way males slobber over female actors and celebrities. Both genders may want such celebrities, completely out of their league, but they both know it would never actually happen. The woman who ogled Brad Pitt later falls in love with and marries an ordinary man, and the man who ogled Megan Fox later falls in love with and marries an ordinary woman.
Any female who demands a 7-figures provider Chad to marry her is delusional, but these "unreasonable female standards" are typically "Be a functional person, don't be a sadistic woman-beater".
Meanwhile, women and girls not prostituting themselves for lonely males is somehow the blame for all of the world's problems.
I don't see why "Masculism" or whatever has to be for both sides when Feminism is unapologetically one side. Meritocracy can be for merit, and men can be for men.
Nobody said that. The point is that BASED TRADS AND CONSERVATIVES claim to wish to restore meritocracy, but they only wish that for males. They do not want females to have careers, or have a role in the public sphere at all.
Diversity hires are a thing. The blowback is decades deserved.
The point was that un-meritocratic practices such as diversity hires were retarded and detrimental, so demanding women handicap themselves similarly, just because some males couldn't hack it socially or in the job market, is also un-meritocratic.
Somehow, "be decent enough to get a wife" is exempt from the concept of "meritocracy", and they cry about "unreasonable female standards" whenever they are rejected.
When men do poorly, society does poorly. When society does poorly, women do poorly. When the economy does poorly, the plutocrats mass-import browns. And then women do poorly.
Women and girls not letting lonely males fuck them is not the root cause of all the world's issues.
Corporations never cared about society, they only care about money. American labor movements in the 1960s and 1970s opposed mass immigration because they knew it was used to replace American workers with cheap laborers. But companies with money are able to perform psyops, and turn the immigration crisis into some heartstrings-pulling humanitarian tragedy.
Economical problems are not the fault of either gender, and women and girls letting lonely males fuck them isn't going to convince Google to stop importing billions of browns, nor Blackrock to stop buying up houses that could be homes and turning them into rental property.
These economical problems could be solved by political leaders who care about the American people, but they are all bought out by rich pedophiles.