- Registrado
- 24 de Dic, 2014
The purpose of Margaret Atwood is to decrease provincial test scores.Handmaid's tale sucks and was written by a delusional woman.
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
The purpose of Margaret Atwood is to decrease provincial test scores.Handmaid's tale sucks and was written by a delusional woman.
Women (in general) are immensely stupid. They are not in any way fundamentally oppressed today... But they wish that they were, so much so that they gobble up fictional shit like this where women are treated as less than men like it was candy. You would be hard pressed to find a single person today (who isn't an MRA/MGTOW) who didn't believe that men and women deserved to be treated equally under the law... But you don't even have to look that hard to see that the law actually usually treats women *better* than it treats men.
Ver archivo adjunto 1476879
Women (in general) are immensely stupid. They are not in any way fundamentally oppressed today... But they wish that they were, so much so that they gobble up fictional shit like this where women are treated as less than men like it was candy. You would be hard pressed to find a single person today (who isn't an MRA/MGTOW) who didn't believe that men and women deserved to be treated equally under the law... But you don't even have to look that hard to see that the law actually usually treats women *better* than it treats men.
Ver archivo adjunto 1476879
I wonder how she feels about having fallen into the character actor slot she's stuck in: attractive-but-not-pretty-enough-to-be-threatening "female empowerment" lead.
feminism or not, it's awfully ingrained in (some) women that it's their mission in life to "save/fix" men who are "broken" (whether jobless shiftless louts, or up to and including cereal killers), like some twisted florence nightingale syndrome.Many women do seem to love the big dick swinging "cavemen" type guys that are let's say a bit "forceful"
Feminism should have died when it came out that women were sending love letters to Ted fucking Bundy.
Thank Jane Austen for that as her novels pushed that narrative onto women for the past 200 years. And western civilized men more interested in continuing the bloodlines and unwillingness to lobotomize the harridans when needed to.feminism or not, it's awfully ingrained in (some) women that it's their mission in life to "save/fix" men who are "broken" (whether jobless shiftless louts, or up to and including cereal killers), like some twisted florence nightingale syndrome.
It's probably been going on long before then, and it seems to strike people who never even read them, and it doesn't strike everyone that reads them.Thank Jane Austen for that as her novels pushed that narrative onto women for the past 200 years. And western civilized men more interested in continuing the bloodlines and unwillingness to lobotomize the harridans when needed to.
Who the hell wants to deal with French Canadians?Why does everyone from Gilead live in Toronto and not, say, Montreal or Ottawa?
CANADA GOOD, AMERICA BAD. TRUDEAU GOOD, ORANGE MAN BAD. Also, near-universal infertility is bad for America, but a-OK for Canada (?!).The first two seasons, the world building was exquisite. Season 3 was tepid and season 4 is outright bad. Everything since June left Boston has been nonsensical.
Why is there no security for June? How is she allowed to go to the grocery store? If Canada is also having a fertility crisis like Gilead, how is it safe for Nichole to go to the grocery store? Where does all the food in the grocery store come from? How did Luke and Moira move out of refugee housing into that nice, furnished house when he doesn’t appear to be gainfully employed and she volunteers with an NGO? Why were they apparently in the refugee apartment for 6 years? When did Emily get back together with whatsername? How did Rita become so chummy with Emily and Moira? Why does everyone from Gilead live in Toronto and not, say, Montreal or Ottawa? Why is everything so dark? Are there other people in the brutalist prison, or just the Waterfords? Why is the US ambassador to Canada in charge of the prisoners? Why are such high-value war criminals not in a more secure prison?
If Gilead is such a terrible regime that people get vanned for talking to the wrong person, are we still hanging out with the same 10 or so people we were hanging out with in the very first episode?????
My ability to suspend disbelief has been fractured and I’m not sure it’s coming back.
Kelly Ripa is a disgrace. She claims to be catholic, yet she surpports the anti catholic show Handmaids Tale that openly lies about Catholics. She is just like Biden a fake catholicCANADA GOOD, AMERICA BAD. TRUDEAU GOOD, ORANGE MAN BAD. Also, near-universal infertility is bad for America, but a-OK for Canada (?!).
God I hate this series. Such a great concept but having fucks like Kelly Ripa say it's "Trump's America" for women is going full-retard. The A&N fag in me WISHES it was true, but then I realize religious fundies are just as fucked as SJWs (so in a universe like Handmaid's Tale, large scale human extinction is a desirable outcome).
This is why I don't watch this show. It somehow makes me more mad at the world than the real world does...
There's a reason why there are many churches such as Catholic, mormon, prostant and so on. The thing that makes most Christians come together as of lately is the left.Handmaid's Tale suffers from a common misconception on the left regarding the "Religious Right": that it is in any way a unified, monolithic group capable of maintaining a widespread grip on power without immediately succumbing to factionalism and splintering. It wouldn't last any longer than the leadership sitting down at the table to try and work out what their new fundamentalist state's doctrinal principals will be.
Handmaid's Tale suffers from a common misconception on the left regarding the "Religious Right": that it is in any way a unified, monolithic group capable of maintaining a widespread grip on power without immediately succumbing to factionalism and splintering. It wouldn't last any longer than the leadership sitting down at the table to try and work out what their new fundamentalist state's doctrinal principals will be.
You could say the same thing about Islam, but they still managed to field ISIS, the Taliban, and the rise of the Ayatollahs.
Margaret Atwood didn't put anything in her book that hasn't happened somewhere.
Islam has two principle factions that have shown enough ability to be able to hold territory over very extended periods of time. Christianity only really had that to any degree under Catholicism, where the church held territories and exerted control over the rest (I don't think Eastern Orthodoxy had the same level of control, but I could be wrong). Once Protestantism showed up, the religious authorities no longer held civil power and the continuity of the institutions aren't as strong. But lefties don't do much hand-wringing over Catholics, despite them being the only denomination with any history of being able to hold the sort of power lefties claim Protestants do.You could say the same thing about Islam, but they still managed to field ISIS, the Taliban, and the rise of the Ayatollahs.
Margaret Atwood didn't put anything in her book that hasn't happened somewhere.