Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
👺 Your 推し is くそRev says desu / Louis Testone Jr. / "The Lolicon King" - A lolicon Vtuber with a 700k sub Youtube Channel, Grown Ass Man into drawings of little girls getting fucked, married to a fat bitch that thinks "loli pussy hits different".
🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
With how they are you expect them to already have it with the people they allow in.That show allow anyone that claim to be right on that without even checking at all.
With how they are you expect them to already have it with the people they allow in.That show allow anyone that claim to be right on that without even checking at all.
Razorfist and Leaflit are both Sidescrollers guests, and Leaflit was a star player together with Rev in The Real Game Awards 2025/6. Razorfist may have been dropped from the lineup, I don't keep up with them.
After having a conversation with Strawb about marrying ex-whores and involving Christianity, Remnant777 has now become aware of her and Rev being degenerate lolicons and stated that he does not condone that at all.
With all that's happening recently between pred hunters and lolisho freaks, more of the prominent lolifags finally getting called out is refreshing.
LoL I thought Remnant was smarter and actually did research about people but I guess I'm wrong and he's just as stupid as most "Christian red wing youtubers".
LoL I thought Remnant was smarter and actually did research about people but I guess I'm wrong and he's just as stupid as most "Christian red wing youtubers".
Yeah I don't get why Remnant didn't look into who Rev and Strawb are beforehand. But I'm going to give him a benefit of the doubt (for now) and say that at least now he knows. Let's hope he'll learn from this mistake.
To defend him a little bit, the way a Youtuber would normally look into a collaborator is to loon at their Youtube and Twitter, and if you do that, none of their recent videos or tweets would appear to be lolicon to an outsider. He would have needed to either look at Kiwifarms or think to search "loli" on their twitter. That being said, even a cursory look would have told him they are mega gooners, so it's clear he has no problem with that.
To defend him a little bit, the way a Youtuber would normally look into a collaborator is to loon at their Youtube and Twitter, and if you do that, none of their recent videos or tweets would appear to be lolicon to an outsider. He would have needed to either look at Kiwifarms or think to search "loli" on their twitter. That being said, even a cursory look would have told him they are mega gooners, so it's clear he has no problem with that.
LoL I thought Remnant was smarter and actually did research about people but I guess I'm wrong and he's just as stupid as most "Christian red wing youtubers".
Yeah I don't get why Remnant didn't look into who Rev and Strawb are beforehand. But I'm going to give him a benefit of the doubt (for now) and say that at least now he knows. Let's hope he'll learn from this mistake.
This is what happens when you give people the "benefit of the doubt". Well, sometimes we ought to give ourselves the benefit of having a cleaner record for those who do not wish to better themselves.
To defend him a little bit, the way a Youtuber would normally look into a collaborator is to loon at their Youtube and Twitter, and if you do that, none of their recent videos or tweets would appear to be lolicon to an outsider. He would have needed to either look at Kiwifarms or think to search "loli" on their twitter. That being said, even a cursory look would have told him they are mega gooners, so it's clear he has no problem with that.
Glad Remnant is distancing himself from vtubers completely after all this Leaflit shit. I felt his disappointment on a personal level, as I was also watching a lot of them, without knowing how much of them are all sorts of degens and e-whores.
He also called Tactikal Templar fucking retarded. Wanna bet the fat Lebanese Jew will respond?
LoL I thought Remnant was smarter and actually did research about people but I guess I'm wrong and he's just as stupid as most "Christian red wing youtubers".
Remnant is intelligent with his video essays and his debate with Strawb but oblivious to her and the right wing VTuber grift
Hopefully he will be more aware of this type of clique and to the due dilligence of researching his guests.
I prefer Remnant over Leaflit and loli lover Rev for being level headed andgrounded in his ideas.
I just remembered that Remnant is on record saying that lolicons should be hanged, and as far as I'm concerned this is the thing he's most well known for, I'm a little surprised Strawb wanted to talk to him.
They are a hell of a hypocrites couple. no wonder why belong to each other for being scum on their likes & loli/shota tastes.
But more further when she must mention her religion as a form of show any NONE good side that both of them preach at the highest standard, Just pathetic but then i keep remembering myself that these fuckers have none an inch of shame when mentioning their supposed religion among with it's beliefs.
Both deserve to burn in hell and get the worse while they're alive.
Here's the stream she's talking about, Louis addresses the lolicon question at both 43:45 and 57:43 in response to superchats from an Argentinian lolicon.
1:46
The first superchat has the appearance of being adversarial, and Louis responds by first saying that "Well, the thing with all this stuff is as always with any sort of genre of this stuff, I'm not sitting here saying like uh you need to go out and consume this content." He follows this up by saying his "very simple point" is that lolicons are not predators (interestingly he doesn't say they aren't pedophiles) and "people should have the choice to consume whatever adult content they want." Then he reaffirms that his opinion is simple and not very deep, and reiterates his opinion that you shouldn't call lolicons predators. He follows this up by saying "uh that doesn't mean you're sitting there like uh consuming it yourself or doing anything like that." There are two things I want to point out here: 1 Louis seems to understand lolicon to refer exclusively to a kind of pornography and 2 Louis seems to have almost forgotten to say he doesn't watch loli porn despite being seemingly accused of being a lolicon, and in fact he opens by implying that he does watch loli porn. Head Janny Strawb leaves a message saying "porn is porn and porn is sinful period rev doesn't say otherwise"
The Argentinian clarifies in his second superchat that he is a lolicon and gives his justification for lolicon to the curious. Louis responds: "Well it depends on what your definition is. I mean looking at porn would be lusting in any sort of a form. Yeah." Given the fact that Louis clearly doesn't know how he should respond, he gets an idea: "What's Strawb saying?" Strawb left a chat message saying "i would disagree that anything lustful is in fact inherently sinful" (keep that in the back of your mind) Louis agrees and tries to repeat his response to the first superchat "I just think again with my whole my whole argument or the whole point I would say is that just because you don't consume content or you think it's weird or you think it's something that you don't want to consume yourself doesn't mean it should just be inherently uh taken away from other people. People should have the choice as long as it's not hurting anyone, which this case it's not." Viewers who are built astute may notice that he hasn't really repeated himself. In the first place, he placed a defense of lolicons against accusations of child predation as the chief part of his opinion earlier, but now he is clearly principally concerned with a right to loli porn. He also didn't feel the need to claim that he isn't a lolicon, instead speaking exclusively about some nebulous person who is not a lolicon (in fact, even in his first argument he did not say anything along the lines of "I am not a lolicon" but only weakly implied it by saying that loli defenders do not necessarily want to consume lolicon). Now, in the back of your mind you may remember how Strawb responded to a defense of loli porn by saying "i would disagree that anything lustful is in fact inherently sinful". That's a very strange thing for someone to say after saying that all porn is sinful, especially since she is directly contradicting her husband who just tried to say that porn is bad because it is intrinsically lusting. Another strange thing: Strawb has mentioned on Xitter that she covered up the exposed tummy on her pajama model and that her model is not a loli. https://nitter.net/darlingstrawbie/status/2032932944197640468#m (Archive) https://nitter.net/darlingstrawbie/status/1843362695594348847#m (Archive)
This is curious because she happens to still have a video on her Xitter of her model in that pajama outfit with the caption tummy day? okay!! i hope im not too late senpais!!!!!! #いいおなかの日 In this video she focuses the camera on the genital region and exposed belly of her model and sways her hips while the song loli-god requiem plays. Also you can see that she commissioned her model to have a tattoo on the pubic mound.
They are a hell of a hypocrites couple. no wonder why belong to each other for being scum on their likes & loli/shota tastes.
But more further when she must mention her religion as a form of show any NONE good side that both of them preach at the highest standard, Just pathetic but then i keep remembering myself that these fuckers have none an inch of shame when mentioning their supposed religion among with it's beliefs.
Both deserve to burn in hell and get the worse while they're alive.
I must have said this before, yet they are some sort of a "Downie Bonnie & Clyde" couple.
Why do I say this? While not retarded, they are crafty enough to know the difference between right and wrong and can't claim to know what they are doing wrong and appeal to "I wasn't aware!!!". And honestly, I think Louis is a psychopath in the strict sense, meaning he only cares about himself: he found a partner that dabbles in the same interest as he does - therefore, she is good for his own interests at the current time.
However, the moment she stops being "useful", he will stab her on the back and will look for a backup plan. He probably doesn't care for the "fans" he has, only looking for the money they offer. What he may not be aware is that she is the same as he is - she may have a backup plan to stab him on the back as well.
In essence: a psychopath couple. I don't mean to say this as the layman's version of a "psychopath" - attractive, incredibly smart, resourceful. It could be an average joe who makes mistakes.
