Resident Evil - Virgin Vampire Wine Mom vs Chad Magnetic Lebowski

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Do people think Nukes are more destructive than they are? there IS a giant fuck off crater in Racoon city from the Nuke (honestly bigger than what an actual Nuke would make) but why, oh way do people think it would knock over every building.

that isn't how they work, even the fucking Tsar Bomb wouldn't pave the whole city to the floor.Ver archivo adjunto 9182533
It's not so much what a nuke can actually do in reality, it's that the ending FMV for RE3 showed how Racoon as absolutely destroyed.
 
It's not so much what a nuke can actually do in reality, it's that the ending FMV for RE3 showed how Racoon as absolutely destroyed.
just the flame wave really, which isn't really typical of Nuke's but MOAB's, which it should have been, I hock it up to the dev's not understanding Nuke's and wanting to be dramatic, if a nuke that large (they don't even exist, the nuke in that ending would be larger than the TSAR Bomb) was deployed on Racoon City it would be a devastating ecological event.
 
just the flame wave really, which isn't really typical of Nuke's but MOAB's, which it should have been, I hock it up to the dev's not understanding Nuke's and wanting to be dramatic, if a nuke that large (they don't even exist, the nuke in that ending would be larger than the TSAR Bomb) was deployed on Racoon City it would be a devastating ecological event.
What do you mean, 'Just the flame wave'? It clearly showed buildings being ripped apart and disintegrated.

If your complaint is that the explosion is unrealistic, then sure, you're probably not wrong, but this is a series with zombies other abominations of science while people backflip over lasers and punch boulders. An unrealistic bomb explosion for the sake of dramatic effect is acceptable.

Racoon city was a devastating ecological disaster, before the the nuke/MOAB/Tsar Bomb drop.
 
People meme on Chris's boulder-like body, but the reason why he is so buff is really depressing.

After Wesker bodied him in Code Veronica, Chris felt so humiliated he worked his ass off at the gym because he wanted to be on equal ground with genetically modified Wesker.

Then, Chris's insecurity grew larger after losing Jill in Lost in Nightmares.

just the flame wave really, which isn't really typical of Nuke's but MOAB's, which it should have been, I hock it up to the dev's not understanding Nuke's and wanting to be dramatic, if a nuke that large (they don't even exist, the nuke in that ending would be larger than the TSAR Bomb) was deployed on Racoon City it would be a devastating ecological event.

It was a devastating ecological event. Every time Raccoon City was mentioned or shown pre-RE9 there was emphasis on how absolutely nothing remained.

The only reason Capcom retconned Raccoon's destruction was just so they could reuse REmake 2's assets and nostalgia bait.
 
People meme on Chris's boulder-like body, but the reason why he is so buff is really depressing.

After Wesker bodied him in Code Veronica, Chris felt so humiliated he worked his ass off at the gym because he wanted to be on equal ground with genetically modified Wesker.

Then, Chris's insecurity grew larger after losing Jill in Lost in Nightmares.



It was a devastating ecological event. Every time Raccoon City was mentioned or shown pre-RE9 there was emphasis on how absolutely nothing remained.

The only reason Capcom retconned Raccoon's destruction was just so they could reuse REmake 2's assets and nostalgia bait.
I'm saying if a Nuke that insane existed and was deployed it would do unknown and never before seen shit, to glass 30+ city blocks would require a fucking monster Nuke never before developed (officially).
 
People meme on Chris's boulder-like body, but the reason why he is so buff is really depressing.

After Wesker bodied him in Code Veronica, Chris felt so humiliated he worked his ass off at the gym because he wanted to be on equal ground with genetically modified Wesker.

Then, Chris's insecurity grew larger after losing Jill in Lost in Nightmares.
Some people turn to alcohol as a means of coping with insecurity issues, and Chris turned to steroids.
 
People meme on Chris's boulder-like body, but the reason why he is so buff is really depressing.

After Wesker bodied him in Code Veronica, Chris felt so humiliated he worked his ass off at the gym because he wanted to be on equal ground with genetically modified Wesker.

Then, Chris's insecurity grew larger after losing Jill in Lost in Nightmares.
Which is pretty badass honestly. Chris met a superhuman and decided to just bulk up instead of trying to mutate himself.
What do you mean, 'Just the flame wave'? It clearly showed buildings being ripped apart and disintegrated.

If your complaint is that the explosion is unrealistic, then sure, you're probably not wrong, but this is a series with zombies other abominations of science while people backflip over lasers and punch boulders. An unrealistic bomb explosion for the sake of dramatic effect is acceptable.

Racoon city was a devastating ecological disaster, before the the nuke/MOAB/Tsar Bomb drop.
I mean it's a clear retcon. The reason you'd think it was a nuke was because what else would contain a virus that was rapidly spreading and creating insanely strong mutants.

There's not even a point arguing about it because it RC was annihilated at the end of 3, nothing was left. Certainly not enough for buildings and vehicles to still be intact.
 
Which is pretty badass honestly. Chris met a superhuman and decided to just bulk up instead of trying to mutate himself.

I mean it's a clear retcon. The reason you'd think it was a nuke was because what else would contain a virus that was rapidly spreading and creating insanely strong mutants.

There's not even a point arguing about it because it RC was annihilated at the end of 3, nothing was left. Certainly not enough for buildings and vehicles to still be intact.
I still just don't buy its a nuke nor would it acheive the goal of taking out all the infected, there's a god damn spider web of underground bullshit that would be almost completely intact, same with the subway system.

Why do people believe a single nuke would pave that much Cityscape? sure its literally shown to us in 3, but its almost comical levels of destruction, well over 30 city blocks atomized yet somehow the fuckin Helicopter just flies away.. the kinetic force from a bomb this big would have absolutely destroyed that Heli and LIQUIFIED Barry and Jill (and Carlos) the light alone would have blinded both of them, even with their eyes tightly shut, it would have been akin to staring at the Sun from a foot away from it.

Retconning this ending was smart, its not even in the realm of believability, regardless of the franchise, it would have been the single most destructive event in human history, easily 10x the Tsar Bomb, people would have gotten fucked by the shockwave for a thousand+ miles outside the city, I cannot stress the sheer physics of a bomb this powerful in this video.
 
BUT MUH THERMOBARIC BOMB

1782260066864.png

It incinerated miles of city to leave no trace of it. People shit endlessly on 3R... but defend the ending is canon.

ok
 
BUT MUH THERMOBARIC BOMB

Ver archivo adjunto 9184794

It incinerated miles of city to leave no trace of it. People shit endlessly on 3R... but defend the ending is canon.

ok
I mean we all have seen this footage, its just incredibly insane, that they dropped a Nuke with the same power or greater as the Tsar Bomb on a city, I suppose I should state something before someone else does..

you CAN make a Nuke of any size, theoritically they have no upper limit of destructive power, you could build a nuke that would clean the slate of the Earth, in theory, however, no one in 1998 had built a bomb as strong as the one dumped on RC, except the Russians, and likely, its stronger than the Tsar bomb as depicted in 3 OG's ending, which means Jill and Barry should have been atomized so hard even their dust would be atomically seperated, as they were far to close to impact.

in fact, from the initial blastwave, the damage is actually smaller than it should be in totality, this would be either 1.5 or 2X the yield of the Tsar Bomb, and would thus obliterate well over 600 square miles of shit, the effect of just the light from the bomb itself would blind anyone hit by it for well over 2k miles in all directions, the shockwave would shatter glass on both sides, in totality, of the entire North American Continent.
 
capcom retconned the fuck out of the original 3. it doesnt matter, let it go my friend
It especially doesn't matter because they were retconning and changing shit as far back as the original trilogy.

RE4 basically erased all the plot threads the previous games were building towards, just going "Umbrella was defeated between games, lol, lmao" and calling it a day.

Trying to make sense of the Resident Evil overarching story is the pathway to madness, especially since no overarching story ever existed - Capcom will pull whatever plot they want out of their ass to justify whatever they're going after with the newest game.
 
especially since no overarching story ever existed
well up to CV it was defeating Umbrella, so there was one, however they wanted to start keeping the franchise time skipping to whatever the current year was, so come RE4 they realized that 6 years since RC Incident meant something had to come to blows with Umbrella in the meantime.

For the overall franchise, nothing has been more pointlessly devestating than keeping each entry in the franchise in the current year, the age of the Protags, the forced conclusions of events off game all of it stems back to this single choice.

Imagine if you will, they didn't do this.. RE4 could have taken place.. 1 and a half years after RC, with Umbrella still active, Leon still the fresh Secret Agent he is.. and so forth.
 
For the overall franchise, nothing has been more pointlessly devestating than keeping each entry in the franchise in the current year, the age of the Protags, the forced conclusions of events off game all of it stems back to this single choice.
Oh, I fully agree, it's equally stupid they do the same for Street Fighter.

Nobody really cares in which year Street Fighter or Resident Evil games take place, and now they're facing the issue that all their popular characters are in their late 40s of 50s, and it's becoming increasingly implausible for them to keep doing what they're doing.

It wouldn't have been such a big issue if they had used the time to introduce new popular cast members, but for both franchise they keep featuring the same popular legacy characters, and the new blood they do introduce either doesn't gain as much traction as they had hoped, barring the rare exception, or are niggers.

They could have just avoided mentioning the year the games take place in, just keep it vague "early 21st century" and go with that, sneakily updating the technology so the games don't look "outdated."

Dunno where Capcom plans to go with any of this - are they really going to feature Leon in his 60s still suplexing zombies into the ground? Is Chris going to keep the steroid addiction going? Are Jill and Ada going to look like they've had some heavily plastic surgery done to them?

I guess one asspull is that they could say the T-virus either slows down aging, or getting injected with the antiviral agent from RE9 starts regressing their aging?

Or they could attempt to introduce new characters to take over (again), or they simply reboot the whole thing and start from scratch?

Not really sure what they could do, but they'll need to make a decision soon, they have, maybe, another decade to pull the trigger, and that's me being generous.
 
Not really sure what they could do, but they'll need to make a decision soon, they have, maybe, another decade to pull the trigger, and that's me being generous.
There's things they can do, and things they will do, and those two things only overlap a little.

They already tried "new characters" but all of them essentially have a problem of "In Media Res", aka coming into a story already in progress and being completely unestablished, they can't really compete with Leon S. Kennedy, one of gaming most high profile beloved characters, and they can't keep using him forever because he's Old, which he shouldn't BE Old, but he is, because they time skilled 5ish years each game whether he was in it or not, for instance its been over TEN YEARS in universe since the Dulvey Incident, that's how bad its gotten, due to game time development.

Ethan Winters is how it will go every time, sure people like him, but the pressure to bring back the OG's is too great, and money is on the line, Requiem sold very well simply because Leon was in it, conjuring a character with that much gravitas out of thin air is simply impossible to do at will, it would entirely be gambling.

and Rebooting? we've already done it! we are almost out of the games people even care about rebooting!
 
and Rebooting? we've already done it! we are almost out of the games people even care about rebooting!
Rebooting in the sense of starting the whole story from scratch. RE1, but now set in the quaint 2030s or some such.

Then again, another way they could go is to make games set in the periods between games, like how Darkside Chronicles tried to tell what happened to Leon between RE2 and RE4.

They could probably milk the nostalgia with a few non-remake games featuring Chris and Jill, or even Claire, give them the Leon treatment. There's also Rebecca, Hunk and Barry from the OG cast, or even Wesker and Ada, with decades worth of empty space to fill.

Alternatively, they could do Resident Evil 00, showing what went down with Bravo team before Alpha arrived.

I'm genuinely curious to see how they handle it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo