Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
Pictures on the Internet that have made you laugh hysterically - Even moderators argue if you can post videos in here
🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
A funny pictures thread is probably not the place to sperg about this, but this always drives me nuts.
The sum of all positive integers is undefined, it diverges, it diverges to infinity, it increases without bound - however one wants to phrase it, they all mean the same thing. If you add up more and more positive integers, the partial sums obviously grow without bound - the series diverges.
The analytic continuation of the summation formula has the value of -1/12 at s=-1, true, but the analytic continuation is not equal to the summation at s=-1, otherwise it would be undefined too- they are different functions.
Of course, no one wants to say:
“if you want to fill in the singularities of the summation in an analytic way, the new function you get happens to have a value of -1/12 when s=-1; and of course the formula for this filled in function is not the summation given when s=-1, otherwise there’d be no singularity to begin with, but it makes people confused when we pretend it is, and makes us feel clever, so we’ll keep doing it”
A funny pictures thread is probably not the place to sperg about this, but this always drives me nuts.
The sum of all positive integers is undefined, it diverges, it diverges to infinity, it increases without bound - however one wants to phrase it, they all mean the same thing. If you add up more and more positive integers, the partial sums obviously grow without bound - the series diverges.
The analytic continuation of the summation formula has the value of -1/12 at s=-1, true, but the analytic continuation is not equal to the summation at s=-1, otherwise it would be undefined too- they are different functions.
Of course, no one wants to say:
“if you want to fill in the singularities of the summation in an analytic way, the new function you get happens to have a value of -1/12 when s=-1; and of course the formula for this filled in function is not the summation given when s=-1, otherwise there’d be no singularity to begin with, but it makes people confused when we pretend it is, and makes us feel clever, so we’ll keep doing it”
Fyi, I was saving that burka (?) guy joke because it highlights his body in really interesting ways that womanbrain could not ignore, could not care less about the joke itself.
I'm honestly not entirely sure, especially as fake crab is really just a cheap substitute for the much more expensive crabmeat ー it's probably just a means of selling horse meat that isn't of sufficient quality to be made into tartare (which is really good with quail egg, ginger, soy sauce, and sesame oil).
Although the English in the pic reads: "Whale flavor", it's more accurate to say that it's prepared as 大和煮 (Yamato-ni), a kind of sweet, braising style most well-known for use with whale meat, so it might also be aimed at people whom like the taste of Yamato-ni, but dislike whale.
Yeah, the true function of the police is to stop mobs of retards from destroying/stealing things that aren't theirs. This is correct. This is the way it should be. What's the issue here?
