UK NHS to test all ‘trans’ children for autism


Every child referred to a gender clinic will be screened under new guidance following Cass Review

The NHS will test all children who believe they are transgender for autism under new plans seen by The Telegraph.

Every child referred to a gender clinic will be “screened for neurodevelopmental conditions” such as autism and ADHD under new guidance, to be introduced in the wake of the Cass review.

The review, by paediatrician Baroness Cass, found that the mental health conditions were disproportionately common among children and young people with gender dysphoria.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, their relationship with their family and their sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

As part of a proposal to incorporate Lady Cass’s recommendations, the health service will move away from the “medical model” operated by the controversial Tavistock’s Gender Identity Development Service in favour of a “holistic” approach.

The new guidance will be released for public consultation imminently before being rolled out later this year.

It will be used by established children’s gender clinics in London and Manchester, and was reviewed by Lady Cass at the start of 2025.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, relationship with their family and sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

However, some groups criticised a “serious flaw” in the policy as it leaves an open door to the use of cross-sex hormones. They also condemned its absence of recognition of the wider societal issues to which children are exposed.

Policy probes eight key areas​

The new NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service will explore eight key areas of a child’s life.

To assess “development”, doctors will take a “detailed history” of the child’s social, cognitive and physical growth, particularly because of the “substantial” changes that take place during puberty.

They will screen children for autism and learning disabilities and look into whether further “cognitive assessments” are necessary.

The specification says: “Given the high prevalence of neurodiversity identified within this population, all those attending the NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service should receive screening for neurodevelopmental conditions.”

The “multidisciplinary team” of experts, including a consultant specialising in neurodevelopmental disorders, will create a treatment plan for each individual depending on their diagnosis.

If screening “identifies the presence of neurodevelopmental conditions, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a referral should be considered to the Paediatric Neurodevelopmental Service or Paediatric ASD Service,” the guidance states.

In such cases, the team of doctors will have to determine if the child’s symptoms are caused by autism or whether they also need separate treatment for gender dysphoria.

They could also be kept under review every six months while getting help for their autism or discharged from the service.

Cases of both conditions have risen sharply in recent years. Recorded rates of gender confusion in under 18s have risen from 0.14 per 10,000 people in 2011 to 4.4 per 10,000 in 2021, driven largely by girls entering adolescence.

At the same time, autism has gone from being diagnosed in about one in 2,500 children, to one in 34 children aged 10-14 as of estimates for 2018.

Prof Michael Craig, clinical lead for the NHS National Autism Unit from 2007 until 2023, previously estimated half of patients seen by the Tavistock’s clinic had autism after observing sessions.

In her review, Baroness Cass linked the rise in teenage girls “struggling with gender identity, suicidal ideation and self-harm” with cases of “undiagnosed autism, which is often missed in adolescent girls”.

She said it was the “common denominator” with one study finding transgender people were three to six times more likely to be autistic than those who are not.

Patients at the new service will also undergo a thorough mental health assessment because of the “higher rates of mental health difficulties” among gender-questioning children.

The NHS guidance described a previous “reluctance to explore or address” mental health conditions because gender dysphoria was not classified as one, but said that “identifying and treating” any mental illness should be an “integrated part” of their care.

It added that they should undergo a “mental state examination” and be questioned about “mood, anxiety, emotional regulation, beliefs around weight, potential somatic symptoms, concentration, sleep and appetite, self-harm, and suicidal thoughts and behaviours”.

‘Family context’​

Another key area is dubbed “family context”, with medics being tasked to paint a picture of each child’s upbringing and familial relationships.

The specification noted that “there is evidence of an increased frequency of family parental physical and/or mental ill health and other family stressors in this group”.

Under the section titled sexual development, knowledge and sexual orientation, it said “clinicians should seek to understand the child/young person’s emerging sexuality and sexual orientation”.

If this has been a previous issue, doctors should consider whether the child was exposed to “adversity and trauma”.

They will also examine the children’s physical health needs and the impact of any long-term conditions, along with their broader well-being, school relationships and educational attainment.

Medical teams will “undertake an in-depth assessment” of how the gender dysphoria “manifested”, how it has been managed by the family, if any “social transition” has taken place and the impact of any distress caused.

They have been told to look out for “safeguarding issues” such as “transphobic bullying”, “online grooming” and a “breakdown in relationships with families”.

The Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender welcomed the “proposed holistic approach and prioritisation of psychological interventions”.

NHS wait times ‘very long’​

Dr Louise Irvine, a GP and the group’s co-chairman, said: “The new service recognises that many also experience mental health, neurodevelopmental and/or personal, family or social complexities in their lives.

“The challenge will be to ensure NHS services can provide prompt access to appropriate service for any identified needs as waiting lists are currently very long.”

But she went on to say a “serious flaw” in the policy was that it “leaves the door open for referral of children and young people under 18 for cross-sex hormones”.

She described the guidance’s reference to a drug policy that is “seriously out of date, was published before the Cass Review and does not take on board the scientific reviews which showed lack of evidence of benefit of hormones in this group” as “irresponsible”.

A spokesman for Bayswater Support Group, which advocates for evidence-based care on behalf of 600 families with trans-identifying children, said: “The more careful and holistic assessment by the NHS is welcome, however, there is still scant recognition of the environmental factors influencing children’s understanding of gender issues.

“Schools continue to teach gender identity as fact and socially transition children without parental consent. Young social media influencers monetise content claiming the health benefits of controversial medical treatments.

“And authority figures, including politicians, cast doubt on the findings of the Cass Review and falsely associate evidence-based findings with far-Right narratives.”

They added: “Within this context, it is very difficult indeed for professionals to make accurate diagnoses or to determine the most effective support for a patient experiencing distress.”

An NHS spokesman said: “We will soon be going to full public consultation on this draft specification which sets out the new holistic assessment framework that was described by Dr Cass in her report.

“NHS England has recently changed the referral pathway so child patients can only access gender services that we commission if they’re referred by a paediatrician or a child and adolescent mental health worker.”
 
Even if it's a separate mental illness, it's still a mental illness and the "treatment" shouldn't be chopping your dick off. Most people "treated" actually end up more depressed and more dysphoric afterward when they realize the effects from HRT are unpredictable and bottom surgery usually looks botched without much sexual sensation.
Most of the surgical solutions are insane but if $30 in pills makes people happy then sure whatever. My pain meds make me happy I can't judge.

I think the main issue with these people losing it is that they're not transgender at all. They're attracted to it via porn/groomcord/community, hype it up to themselves as THE solution to ALL of their problems, and then it's not, its a solution to a problem they dont have. They either get off the train there, or go to the next step that surely, this time, will be the solution to all of their problems. Repeat ad nauseasm until they get out or crash out, the further in to the irreversible effects of HRT/surgery they are, the more likely they crash out.
 
Don’t worry janny, I’ll reply to your thread!

Here’s some Reddit trannies melting down.

They are so damn pressed by the term "same-sex attraction". Yeah, it sounds clunky, but that's essentially what it is. Either you're attracted to the same sex or you aren't. They really hate when anybody points out the existence of (bio-) sex because none of their insane ramblings and identities can coexist with it.

Also the retard saying "hurr durr that's an unecessary medicalization of sexuality". Nigga your entire movement's existence is based on medicalization of your identity. Get the fuck out.
 
And with that the “genocide” proceeds as scheduled.
1745806378916.webp
Not castrating someone is now genocide. Delightfully devilish, Seymore.
 
Well hopefully this'll generate the data needed to do that. The popular narrative is that kids who think they're a tranny need to be taken completely at face value, and so none of this is ever really challenged or placed under any sort of scrutiny.

Testing them for autism is a common sense move that can prove or disprove the hypothesis that trannies have autism more frequently than normal folx. To be fair, one of the seething reddit troons is correct that this may artificially inflate the prevalence of autism in trannies COMPARED to normal kids, but that's just a reality of it being completely infeasible to screen literally every child for autism.

Overall, troids want all the benefits of trans being regarded as a medical phenomenon that is in need of medical intervention, with no scrutiny and no scientific method applied to it. They essentially want it to be a self medicated condition - imagine if we never bothered to investigate the cause of schizophrenia or appropriate treatment plans, and instead just placated whatever delusional demands a schizo might make.
Imagine if we just let Adolf do his thing back then. What's so wrong about what he did, amirite? 😉
 
> RFK Jr. vowing to find the causes of autism
> UK, does a 180 on their tranny worshipping agenda and wants to test trannies for autism

:thinking:
My conspiracy senses are tingling
What are 「they」planning?
 
Before we get to the meme replies, 41%, etc; I'm actually interested in the data. Truly. How much of this is perversion and how much is actually autism? I want pie charts and bar graphs breaking this shit down.
I don't have any charts, BUT
being autistic inherently doesnt affect you

being autstic in an environment of non austistics affects you

imagine youre autistic with bullying haunting you and having little connection to your peers because your brain is just different and doesnt connect with the social aspects.

its conceivable that there are people who might see theyre lack of belonging to their gender peers as an inherent gender issue in themselves.
Let me flip the script here. I can't point to any studies, but what I can say, without a shadow of a doubt, is that autism does affect you. No matter how many people say otherwise, or what they say, autism is a disability that fucks with your perception of the world, people, and yourself. It's not just the non-autistic environment, it can range from only being able to eat certain things without gagging, to not being able to stop thinking about X or Y, even when you really need to. While "autism" becoming a blanket term, it's still a legit condition.

Connecting to this:
MTFs are usually on the porn side, and FTMs are usually on the autism side. But having both a porn addiction and autism is also pretty common among troons. Autists can hyperfixate and get addicted to things easily, and with social interaction being difficult, they gravitate more towards online communities, which are porn-infested.
Just to add, it can come from loneliness, and addictive/obsessive tendencies, but the hyperfixation also affects how they think. You know the "I followed the instruction manual, wore a dress and everything, how come they see me as a man!?" It's that on a larger, more existential scale. Autroons don't think, "I'm deeply unhappy, what am I missing?" and actually think about what they really need. They think, "I'm deeply unhappy, but jerking off wearing a dress feels so good!" or "I'm deeply unhappy, but hiding myself and pretending to be something else makes me feel less bad." They don't think about the implications of these, they jump to, "I must be the opposite gender!" Kids can externalize their problems like this too, for obvious reasons, but being 80-HD or acoustic makes this more likely.

Autism can lead to the meat computer mentality, that just plugging the right widgets in would fix everything when it doesn't, so I expect any studies to track with what Cass found.
 
voight-kampff.gif


You're watching a Sonic Adventure 2 speedrun and you notice that the player uses the Emblem Skip Glitch without first using the Chaos Key Glitch...
 
Ver archivo adjunto 7288569
Not castrating someone is now genocide. Delightfully devilish, Seymore.
Admittedly I sort of wonder if the internet slang use of ‘autistic’ is being conflated with the actual condition and this goes nowhere.


They are so damn pressed by the term "same-sex attraction". Yeah, it sounds clunky, but that's essentially what it is. Either you're attracted to the same sex or you aren't. They really hate when anybody points out the existence of (bio-) sex because none of their insane ramblings and identities can coexist with it.

Also the retard saying "hurr durr that's an unecessary medicalization of sexuality". Nigga your entire movement's existence is based on medicalization of your identity. Get the fuck out.
I want to say that term exists because otherwise blacks and other minorities won’t fess up to fucking other dudes. The term “gay” is, well, gay to them so they won’t identify with it.
 
Why do I get the feeling this will lead to troon sympathizer therapists just wink wink telling them to go online and buy sketchy bathtub HRT shit from skeevy internet troons instead of going to clinics and getting screened and when caught doing so will reeee and justify it by 'protecting trans kids' and 'stopping the genocide' or something to that effect
They already do this. It's a lot more difficult for a kid to get their hands on a credit card or crypto currency and have to pay out of pocket for it. Versus the government handing chemicals out for free with the support of the government institutions.
 
They are actually getting treated as a illness that needs to be cured.

In the nascent days of troonery it was treated precisely that way, as some psychiatric curiosity. There were far fewer people exhibiting it so it was given a far more live-and-let-live treatment but there was certainly no illusion that it was anything but some aberration of the mind.

Then it got attached to being gay, and since being gay was removed from the DSM and treated as "100% NORMAL BEHAVIOUR", it was inevitable that being a tranny would soon follow. The difference is, it is pretty easy to be gay without any external aid, let alone medical intervention. You can't be a troon - or at least can't be a gross simulacrum of a man/woman - without medical intervention. Thus being trans has long straddled the line of "born this way and totally natural " and "in need of 'life saving affirmative care'".

It took a long time but the pendulum now seems to be swinging back towards it being the mental disorder that it obviously is.

Whether being a tranny is the result of autism or grooming remains to be seen. I'd imagine the truth lies somewhere in the middle. Evidently there's some level of "mind virus" involved, but I think it's also true that spergs are far more likely to be susceptible to that. Autism may not be the root cause of being a troon, but it certainly raises your chances of being one.
 
Is the U.K fixing itself at a high rate of speed? Is this really happening? Is the first domino from the Rowling lawsuit finally made it all happen?
"Good news Timmy, we're not going to cut off your willy! Now please sit down and watch this "documentary" about how you're actually responsible for all the terrorism, knife crime, and sexual assault in this country! Allah save the King!"
 
I don't know why this hasn't been the standard everywhere for years.

Fundamentally I think transgender is a real mental condition; the brain is a complex black box, it does all sorts of insane things. But simply not to the sheer level we've seen lately with teens and preteens. I imagine if they were all screened, tested and treated for more common mental conditions like The Auts, then out of 100 patients presenting to the doctor as transgender, maybe 5 genuinely are.
The idea of transgenderism just falls apart under any sort of scrutiny. There have been actual brain scans done on these people and they only proved the existence of an innate sexual orientation more than anything else, not that someone could be born with a manbrain or womanbrain.
Even if we were to take a purely psychotherapeutic approach, if someone told you that they "felt" like a man or a woman, what the fuck are you supposed to take from that? What does it mean to feel like a man or a woman? Do they feel a phantom vagina where their dick and balls are?
And if we wanted to operate within the framework of TRA language games, wouldn't it make more sense and less time/effort/resources to help a person's """gender""" align with their natal sex instead of trying to change the impossible? There's no ethical reason for gender-affirming care to exist in its current state.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo