UK NHS to test all ‘trans’ children for autism


Every child referred to a gender clinic will be screened under new guidance following Cass Review

The NHS will test all children who believe they are transgender for autism under new plans seen by The Telegraph.

Every child referred to a gender clinic will be “screened for neurodevelopmental conditions” such as autism and ADHD under new guidance, to be introduced in the wake of the Cass review.

The review, by paediatrician Baroness Cass, found that the mental health conditions were disproportionately common among children and young people with gender dysphoria.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, their relationship with their family and their sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

As part of a proposal to incorporate Lady Cass’s recommendations, the health service will move away from the “medical model” operated by the controversial Tavistock’s Gender Identity Development Service in favour of a “holistic” approach.

The new guidance will be released for public consultation imminently before being rolled out later this year.

It will be used by established children’s gender clinics in London and Manchester, and was reviewed by Lady Cass at the start of 2025.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, relationship with their family and sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

However, some groups criticised a “serious flaw” in the policy as it leaves an open door to the use of cross-sex hormones. They also condemned its absence of recognition of the wider societal issues to which children are exposed.

Policy probes eight key areas​

The new NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service will explore eight key areas of a child’s life.

To assess “development”, doctors will take a “detailed history” of the child’s social, cognitive and physical growth, particularly because of the “substantial” changes that take place during puberty.

They will screen children for autism and learning disabilities and look into whether further “cognitive assessments” are necessary.

The specification says: “Given the high prevalence of neurodiversity identified within this population, all those attending the NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service should receive screening for neurodevelopmental conditions.”

The “multidisciplinary team” of experts, including a consultant specialising in neurodevelopmental disorders, will create a treatment plan for each individual depending on their diagnosis.

If screening “identifies the presence of neurodevelopmental conditions, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a referral should be considered to the Paediatric Neurodevelopmental Service or Paediatric ASD Service,” the guidance states.

In such cases, the team of doctors will have to determine if the child’s symptoms are caused by autism or whether they also need separate treatment for gender dysphoria.

They could also be kept under review every six months while getting help for their autism or discharged from the service.

Cases of both conditions have risen sharply in recent years. Recorded rates of gender confusion in under 18s have risen from 0.14 per 10,000 people in 2011 to 4.4 per 10,000 in 2021, driven largely by girls entering adolescence.

At the same time, autism has gone from being diagnosed in about one in 2,500 children, to one in 34 children aged 10-14 as of estimates for 2018.

Prof Michael Craig, clinical lead for the NHS National Autism Unit from 2007 until 2023, previously estimated half of patients seen by the Tavistock’s clinic had autism after observing sessions.

In her review, Baroness Cass linked the rise in teenage girls “struggling with gender identity, suicidal ideation and self-harm” with cases of “undiagnosed autism, which is often missed in adolescent girls”.

She said it was the “common denominator” with one study finding transgender people were three to six times more likely to be autistic than those who are not.

Patients at the new service will also undergo a thorough mental health assessment because of the “higher rates of mental health difficulties” among gender-questioning children.

The NHS guidance described a previous “reluctance to explore or address” mental health conditions because gender dysphoria was not classified as one, but said that “identifying and treating” any mental illness should be an “integrated part” of their care.

It added that they should undergo a “mental state examination” and be questioned about “mood, anxiety, emotional regulation, beliefs around weight, potential somatic symptoms, concentration, sleep and appetite, self-harm, and suicidal thoughts and behaviours”.

‘Family context’​

Another key area is dubbed “family context”, with medics being tasked to paint a picture of each child’s upbringing and familial relationships.

The specification noted that “there is evidence of an increased frequency of family parental physical and/or mental ill health and other family stressors in this group”.

Under the section titled sexual development, knowledge and sexual orientation, it said “clinicians should seek to understand the child/young person’s emerging sexuality and sexual orientation”.

If this has been a previous issue, doctors should consider whether the child was exposed to “adversity and trauma”.

They will also examine the children’s physical health needs and the impact of any long-term conditions, along with their broader well-being, school relationships and educational attainment.

Medical teams will “undertake an in-depth assessment” of how the gender dysphoria “manifested”, how it has been managed by the family, if any “social transition” has taken place and the impact of any distress caused.

They have been told to look out for “safeguarding issues” such as “transphobic bullying”, “online grooming” and a “breakdown in relationships with families”.

The Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender welcomed the “proposed holistic approach and prioritisation of psychological interventions”.

NHS wait times ‘very long’​

Dr Louise Irvine, a GP and the group’s co-chairman, said: “The new service recognises that many also experience mental health, neurodevelopmental and/or personal, family or social complexities in their lives.

“The challenge will be to ensure NHS services can provide prompt access to appropriate service for any identified needs as waiting lists are currently very long.”

But she went on to say a “serious flaw” in the policy was that it “leaves the door open for referral of children and young people under 18 for cross-sex hormones”.

She described the guidance’s reference to a drug policy that is “seriously out of date, was published before the Cass Review and does not take on board the scientific reviews which showed lack of evidence of benefit of hormones in this group” as “irresponsible”.

A spokesman for Bayswater Support Group, which advocates for evidence-based care on behalf of 600 families with trans-identifying children, said: “The more careful and holistic assessment by the NHS is welcome, however, there is still scant recognition of the environmental factors influencing children’s understanding of gender issues.

“Schools continue to teach gender identity as fact and socially transition children without parental consent. Young social media influencers monetise content claiming the health benefits of controversial medical treatments.

“And authority figures, including politicians, cast doubt on the findings of the Cass Review and falsely associate evidence-based findings with far-Right narratives.”

They added: “Within this context, it is very difficult indeed for professionals to make accurate diagnoses or to determine the most effective support for a patient experiencing distress.”

An NHS spokesman said: “We will soon be going to full public consultation on this draft specification which sets out the new holistic assessment framework that was described by Dr Cass in her report.

“NHS England has recently changed the referral pathway so child patients can only access gender services that we commission if they’re referred by a paediatrician or a child and adolescent mental health worker.”
 
I don't know why this hasn't been the standard everywhere for years.

Fundamentally I think transgender is a real mental condition; the brain is a complex black box, it does all sorts of insane things. But simply not to the sheer level we've seen lately with teens and preteens. I imagine if they were all screened, tested and treated for more common mental conditions like The Auts, then out of 100 patients presenting to the doctor as transgender, maybe 5 genuinely are.
 
Which thread should I poast in?

But seriously, this is excellent news. Actual standards of care for dysphoric children instead of jumping straight to medicalization? This could potentially cut down the number of “trans kids” to a resounding zero, especially if these assessments are as thorough as described.

I don’t think “gender dysphoria” is a real phenomenon in and of itself. Rather, it’s symptomatic of other unaddressed identity disorders (among other things. The fact that the NHS is taking online grooming into account is fucking huge). As such, there’s no such thing as a “true trans” individual either. Any “treatment” these gender clinics administer is basically just putting a bandaid on a massive, festering wound. This could be the beginning of transgender healthcare becoming delegitimized.
 
What the fuck is evidence-based care? If I need help I want fucking help, not a study covering the whole scientific method.
It's care based on evidence.

Sounds so obvious that its silly at first, but unfortunately, a lot of "care" offered in the mental healthy field doesn't actually have any evidence to support its efficacy, either in the past or today. Tranny-run mental health care is a great example: there's no actual "evidence" that cutting children's balls off will improve their mental health, but troons insist on it because chopping off balls fits their social, political, and sex-perversion biases. This has lead to some pretty disastrous consequences, and will lead to worse down the road if it continues.

Hence the push for "evidence-based care", i.e. something that will actually work, rather than something which makes a policy setter feel good.

The quote there:
Dr Louise Irvine, a GP and the group’s co-chairman, said: “The new service recognises that many also experience mental health, neurodevelopmental and/or personal, family or social complexities in their lives.

“The challenge will be to ensure NHS services can provide prompt access to appropriate service for any identified needs as waiting lists are currently very long.”

But she went on to say a “serious flaw” in the policy was that it “leaves the door open for referral of children and young people under 18 for cross-sex hormones”.

She described the guidance’s reference to a drug policy that is “seriously out of date, was published before the Cass Review and does not take on board the scientific reviews which showed lack of evidence of benefit of hormones in this group” as “irresponsible”.

A spokesman for Bayswater Support Group, which advocates for evidence-based care on behalf of 600 families with trans-identifying children, said: “The more careful and holistic assessment by the NHS is welcome, however, there is still scant recognition of the environmental factors influencing children’s understanding of gender issues.

“Schools continue to teach gender identity as fact and socially transition children without parental consent. Young social media influencers monetise content claiming the health benefits of controversial medical treatments.

“And authority figures, including politicians, cast doubt on the findings of the Cass Review and falsely associate evidence-based findings with far-Right narratives.”

They added: “Within this context, it is very difficult indeed for professionals to make accurate diagnoses or to determine the most effective support for a patient experiencing distress.”

An NHS spokesman said: “We will soon be going to full public consultation on this draft specification which sets out the new holistic assessment framework that was described by Dr Cass in her report.

“NHS England has recently changed the referral pathway so child patients can only access gender services that we commission if they’re referred by a paediatrician or a child and adolescent mental health worker.”
tl;dr Science Advocate Lady is basically saying that, according to research, transing kids doesn't make them happier. She's saying that healthcare officials need to stop pretending it does, that (leftwing) authority figures need to stop calling her a Nazi for pointing out facts, and that the more kids get transed, the more dysfunctional the NHS becomes.
 
Última edición:
I don't know why this hasn't been the standard everywhere for years.

Fundamentally I think transgender is a real mental condition; the brain is a complex black box, it does all sorts of insane things. But simply not to the sheer level we've seen lately with teens and preteens. I imagine if they were all screened, tested and treated for more common mental conditions like The Auts, then out of 100 patients presenting to the doctor as transgender, maybe 5 genuinely are.
Even if it's a separate mental illness, it's still a mental illness and the "treatment" shouldn't be chopping your dick off. Most people "treated" actually end up more depressed and more dysphoric afterward when they realize the effects from HRT are unpredictable and bottom surgery usually looks botched without much sexual sensation.
 
MTFs are usually on the porn side, and FTMs are usually on the autism side. But having both a porn addiction and autism is also pretty common among troons. Autists can hyperfixate and get addicted to things easily, and with social interaction being difficult, they gravitate more towards online communities, which are porn-infested.

Countries need to start cracking down on porn next. There should be mandatory ID checks for porn and any site that allows porn. Discord should also be either 18+ or completely ban porn.
Thing is that is all based on observation. Not true analysis. They need to send some of these troons to in patient facilities to see how they tick. Only then can the data be collected. Hopefully this autism test leads to that.
Well hopefully this'll generate the data needed to do that. The popular narrative is that kids who think they're a tranny need to be taken completely at face value, and so none of this is ever really challenged or placed under any sort of scrutiny.

Testing them for autism is a common sense move that can prove or disprove the hypothesis that trannies have autism more frequently than normal folx. To be fair, one of the seething reddit troons is correct that this may artificially inflate the prevalence of autism in trannies COMPARED to normal kids, but that's just a reality of it being completely infeasible to screen literally every child for autism.

Overall, troids want all the benefits of trans being regarded as a medical phenomenon that is in need of medical intervention, with no scrutiny and no scientific method applied to it. They essentially want it to be a self medicated condition - imagine if we never bothered to investigate the cause of schizophrenia or appropriate treatment plans, and instead just placated whatever delusional demands a schizo might make.
It has been insane. With any other diagnosis, you are given meds and shit. Being a troon? "Just feel it out lol, chop your dick off if you want." I'm glad to see that is changing. They are actually getting treated as a illness that needs to be cured.
 
This is actually really good as I know quite a few people who were once trans but detransitioned and admitted to effectively being peer pressured or even groomed into transitioning.

Guess what? Autistic people. Sick fucks trying to manipulate people who REALLY cannot think for themselves because they know they could get away with it.
 
I don't know why this hasn't been the standard everywhere for years.

Fundamentally I think transgender is a real mental condition; the brain is a complex black box, it does all sorts of insane things. But simply not to the sheer level we've seen lately with teens and preteens. I imagine if they were all screened, tested and treated for more common mental conditions like The Auts, then out of 100 patients presenting to the doctor as transgender, maybe 5 genuinely are.
It was never ever proved physically, through brain scans or otherwise, that people who identify themselves as trans and people with gender dysphoria actually have the brain of the opposite sex, in the case of the people claiming this, or that gender dysphoria is a physical mental illness similar to schizophrenia, all of it is fake.
 
Every child referred to a gender clinic will be screened under new guidance following Cass Review

The NHS will test all children who believe they are transgender for autism under new plans seen by The Telegraph.
Why do I get the feeling this will lead to troon sympathizer therapists just wink wink telling them to go online and buy sketchy bathtub HRT shit from skeevy internet troons instead of going to clinics and getting screened and when caught doing so will reeee and justify it by 'protecting trans kids' and 'stopping the genocide' or something to that effect
 
Atrás
Top Abajo