UK NHS to test all ‘trans’ children for autism


Every child referred to a gender clinic will be screened under new guidance following Cass Review

The NHS will test all children who believe they are transgender for autism under new plans seen by The Telegraph.

Every child referred to a gender clinic will be “screened for neurodevelopmental conditions” such as autism and ADHD under new guidance, to be introduced in the wake of the Cass review.

The review, by paediatrician Baroness Cass, found that the mental health conditions were disproportionately common among children and young people with gender dysphoria.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, their relationship with their family and their sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

As part of a proposal to incorporate Lady Cass’s recommendations, the health service will move away from the “medical model” operated by the controversial Tavistock’s Gender Identity Development Service in favour of a “holistic” approach.

The new guidance will be released for public consultation imminently before being rolled out later this year.

It will be used by established children’s gender clinics in London and Manchester, and was reviewed by Lady Cass at the start of 2025.

Medics will also evaluate each child’s mental health, relationship with their family and sexual development, including whether they are experiencing same-sex attraction.

However, some groups criticised a “serious flaw” in the policy as it leaves an open door to the use of cross-sex hormones. They also condemned its absence of recognition of the wider societal issues to which children are exposed.

Policy probes eight key areas​

The new NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service will explore eight key areas of a child’s life.

To assess “development”, doctors will take a “detailed history” of the child’s social, cognitive and physical growth, particularly because of the “substantial” changes that take place during puberty.

They will screen children for autism and learning disabilities and look into whether further “cognitive assessments” are necessary.

The specification says: “Given the high prevalence of neurodiversity identified within this population, all those attending the NHS Children and Young People’s Gender Service should receive screening for neurodevelopmental conditions.”

The “multidisciplinary team” of experts, including a consultant specialising in neurodevelopmental disorders, will create a treatment plan for each individual depending on their diagnosis.

If screening “identifies the presence of neurodevelopmental conditions, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a referral should be considered to the Paediatric Neurodevelopmental Service or Paediatric ASD Service,” the guidance states.

In such cases, the team of doctors will have to determine if the child’s symptoms are caused by autism or whether they also need separate treatment for gender dysphoria.

They could also be kept under review every six months while getting help for their autism or discharged from the service.

Cases of both conditions have risen sharply in recent years. Recorded rates of gender confusion in under 18s have risen from 0.14 per 10,000 people in 2011 to 4.4 per 10,000 in 2021, driven largely by girls entering adolescence.

At the same time, autism has gone from being diagnosed in about one in 2,500 children, to one in 34 children aged 10-14 as of estimates for 2018.

Prof Michael Craig, clinical lead for the NHS National Autism Unit from 2007 until 2023, previously estimated half of patients seen by the Tavistock’s clinic had autism after observing sessions.

In her review, Baroness Cass linked the rise in teenage girls “struggling with gender identity, suicidal ideation and self-harm” with cases of “undiagnosed autism, which is often missed in adolescent girls”.

She said it was the “common denominator” with one study finding transgender people were three to six times more likely to be autistic than those who are not.

Patients at the new service will also undergo a thorough mental health assessment because of the “higher rates of mental health difficulties” among gender-questioning children.

The NHS guidance described a previous “reluctance to explore or address” mental health conditions because gender dysphoria was not classified as one, but said that “identifying and treating” any mental illness should be an “integrated part” of their care.

It added that they should undergo a “mental state examination” and be questioned about “mood, anxiety, emotional regulation, beliefs around weight, potential somatic symptoms, concentration, sleep and appetite, self-harm, and suicidal thoughts and behaviours”.

‘Family context’​

Another key area is dubbed “family context”, with medics being tasked to paint a picture of each child’s upbringing and familial relationships.

The specification noted that “there is evidence of an increased frequency of family parental physical and/or mental ill health and other family stressors in this group”.

Under the section titled sexual development, knowledge and sexual orientation, it said “clinicians should seek to understand the child/young person’s emerging sexuality and sexual orientation”.

If this has been a previous issue, doctors should consider whether the child was exposed to “adversity and trauma”.

They will also examine the children’s physical health needs and the impact of any long-term conditions, along with their broader well-being, school relationships and educational attainment.

Medical teams will “undertake an in-depth assessment” of how the gender dysphoria “manifested”, how it has been managed by the family, if any “social transition” has taken place and the impact of any distress caused.

They have been told to look out for “safeguarding issues” such as “transphobic bullying”, “online grooming” and a “breakdown in relationships with families”.

The Clinical Advisory Network on Sex and Gender welcomed the “proposed holistic approach and prioritisation of psychological interventions”.

NHS wait times ‘very long’​

Dr Louise Irvine, a GP and the group’s co-chairman, said: “The new service recognises that many also experience mental health, neurodevelopmental and/or personal, family or social complexities in their lives.

“The challenge will be to ensure NHS services can provide prompt access to appropriate service for any identified needs as waiting lists are currently very long.”

But she went on to say a “serious flaw” in the policy was that it “leaves the door open for referral of children and young people under 18 for cross-sex hormones”.

She described the guidance’s reference to a drug policy that is “seriously out of date, was published before the Cass Review and does not take on board the scientific reviews which showed lack of evidence of benefit of hormones in this group” as “irresponsible”.

A spokesman for Bayswater Support Group, which advocates for evidence-based care on behalf of 600 families with trans-identifying children, said: “The more careful and holistic assessment by the NHS is welcome, however, there is still scant recognition of the environmental factors influencing children’s understanding of gender issues.

“Schools continue to teach gender identity as fact and socially transition children without parental consent. Young social media influencers monetise content claiming the health benefits of controversial medical treatments.

“And authority figures, including politicians, cast doubt on the findings of the Cass Review and falsely associate evidence-based findings with far-Right narratives.”

They added: “Within this context, it is very difficult indeed for professionals to make accurate diagnoses or to determine the most effective support for a patient experiencing distress.”

An NHS spokesman said: “We will soon be going to full public consultation on this draft specification which sets out the new holistic assessment framework that was described by Dr Cass in her report.

“NHS England has recently changed the referral pathway so child patients can only access gender services that we commission if they’re referred by a paediatrician or a child and adolescent mental health worker.”
 
They already do this. It's a lot more difficult for a kid to get their hands on a credit card or crypto currency and have to pay out of pocket for it. Versus the government handing chemicals out for free with the support of the government institutions.
Less therapists directing them, more other people in trans communities directing them. Misguided or malicious, docs and therapists care about keeping their job and staying out of prison. There are numerous "trans diy" communities on reddit, they will openly discuss and link it on /r9k/. Not in any of their discords but I imagine it's the same.
 
Why the hell have the Brits gotten so based lately in terms of standing up against the troon menace? The rest of Europe and the US still sucks the tranny cock by comparison.
 
Why the hell have the Brits gotten so based lately in terms of standing up against the troon menace? The rest of Europe and the US still sucks the tranny cock by comparison.
Even Null has admitted Britain has long been ahead of the curve on fighting troons. Nonce-hating runs deep. He speculated maybe it’s because of Seville.
 
This is gonna sound retard, if the the kids autistic, then their parents can be classified as autistic being their sexual identity. Just like being fat, and black. They should test them for mental illness and see if they need to be institutionalized so no we won't have another shooter, lol. But fr I am glad that they are doing this so no one outside of the family of the child can get groomed into the ranks of pedo tranny's
 
What the fuck is evidence-based care? If I need help I want fucking help, not some case study telling me I'm wrong for some arbitrary reason.
It could be a buzzword but they’re doing this instead of immediately rushing into expensive and irreversible treatments and surgeries. So you can’t say it’s gotten less responsible.
 
You're telling me that instead of pumping kids full of drugs and putting them through intense and invasive surgeries, we just sit down with them and ask them how they're feeling? Preposterous! Next you'll tell me they should "wait until they're old enough to think rationally about a life-changing decision" or that maybe they can just identify as the other gender without expensive medical intervention. Or even, god forbid, you're suggesting it might actually be a phase they could grow out of!
 
The idea of transgenderism just falls apart under any sort of scrutiny. There have been actual brain scans done on these people and they only proved the existence of an innate sexual orientation more than anything else, not that someone could be born with a manbrain or womanbrain.
Even if we were to take a purely psychotherapeutic approach, if someone told you that they "felt" like a man or a woman, what the fuck are you supposed to take from that? What does it mean to feel like a man or a woman? Do they feel a phantom vagina where their dick and balls are?
And if we wanted to operate within the framework of TRA language games, wouldn't it make more sense and less time/effort/resources to help a person's """gender""" align with their natal sex instead of trying to change the impossible? There's no ethical reason for gender-affirming care to exist in its current state.
They can't tell you what it feels like to be the opposite sex, and they never will. Ever. It's just not possible. Even if they were raised as the opposite sex (like David Reimer, who John Money abused along with his brother), it still wouldn't work.
1745807284189.webp
Insufficient data, and the model still put troons in the male range. They tried to play it off as TIMs being "significantly more female," when they clearly aren't, even on this chart here.
 
Sometimes I wonder if the troon movement is just a ploy to get autistic children to sterilize themselves eugenics-style and/or become even easier targets for pedophiles. Autists are already at elevated risk of grooming due to naiveté. The internet was such a dangerous Pandora's Box to unleash to autists.
I always had a similar pet schizo conspiracy on the back of my mind, that all this was done on purpose to both radicalize through exposure and apply eugenics in a way that is digestible for people like "why instead of forcefully sterilize the undesirables we market it in such a way that they do it themselves? obviously people that is worth something wouldnt go on about chopping their own cocks off" The answer is probably something more simpler, stupider and boring like it always is but is interesting to ponder about that maybe there is some bond villain shit 400IQ reptile doing 42D chess.

Anyways rare Bong W, glad to see them waking up slowly, hope the trend continues.
 
How dare they. Insinuating that autists are more likely to be troons. That’s a bigger insult than just calling them retards.
 
If only you could rate ⏰ an entire government branch.

There were definitely documented cases before the internet. True transgender individuals were even rarer back then-not as "real" women (they’re not), but as delusions that arose on their own.

Once the internet made grooming easy, cases exploded. Sure, some are unrelated to autism, like gay men in denial. But the vast majority of internet-era cases? Most are autistic people who got groomed. Autists are the ones most likely to believe others will magically treat them like anime women instead of seeing them as freaks and laughing behind their backs.

Harsh? Maybe, but it has to be said.
 
Also, the NHS should be on the lookout for troons concocting new handbooks on how to lie to get past these screenings. They were already instructing children on ways to manipulate their doctors into giving them medically-prescribed HRT before this came out.
 
Also, the NHS should be on the lookout for troons concocting new handbooks on how to lie to get past these screenings. They were already instructing children on ways to manipulate their doctors into giving them medically-prescribed HRT before this came out.
If they win we will have prestige drama movies casting this devious behavior as heroic. Do not let it happen!
 
It could be a buzzword but they’re doing this instead of immediately rushing into expensive and irreversible treatments and surgeries. So you can’t say it’s gotten less responsible.

The "evidence based care" advocacy group is very much not pro-transition for children. Note that it's advising the parents of trans-identifying children who I assume are very unimpressed with the NHS' historic policy of handing over blockers and HRT to a child after a 5 minute chat.

The use of the "evidence based" verbiage is very intentional and patently loaded (but also entirely accurate). They are implying that the current standard of care is NOT evidence based, rather made up nonsense to kowtow to the the whims of TRA groups.

It is a very good way to put it, how can anyone argue against evidence-based care in a fucking medical setting?
 
Before we get to the meme replies, 41%, etc; I'm actually interested in the data. Truly. How much of this is perversion and how much is actually autism? I want pie charts and bar graphs breaking this shit down.
From my observations it's autistic obsession with porn which leads to AGP.
I mean you'd have to actually find out what the rate of transitioning is for a mentally well person, with no sexual trauma, who isn't groomed by sex ed, the Internet, kink/porn, isn't porn obsessed, and an incel.
Every troon, male or female, has a combination of those traits. Then you really have to acknowledge the logical question that stems from that.
How many GAY people/kids are like that because of same?
Sexual attraction is as much a learned/environmental behavior as it is an instinctual one.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo