Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
The only reason I could think of to actually quantify "lolcowery" in any way would be to make some kind of KF parody game, either vidya or card. And that's too much work to gain the approval of a couple dozen autists who would actually care.
The only reason I could think of to actually quantify "lolcowery" in any way would be to make some kind of KF parody game, either vidya or card. And that's too much work to gain the approval of a couple dozen autists who would actually care.
It's weird how like 90% of cows all have terrible hygiene in common with the crazier ones being dirtier.
I know you were joking about rating them on the shit thing but now that I think about it there could actually be some merit to psychology studies to do that.
Daisy, Daisy give me your answer do.
I'm half crazy all for the love of you.
It won't be a stylish marriage,
I can't afford a carriage.
But you'll look sweet,
Upon the seat,
Of a bicycle made for two.
I opened this thinking it would be an autistic look at like statistics about autistics
like "Chris Chan has been talked about on the internet 241412412 times while Dobson has been tweeted about 3213123 times
how disappointing, you couldve even made a fucking tier list and encouraged others to make one too and that wouldve been more entertaining than asking for this
Best thing to do: Make a list of all the Ratking members and then assign them randomly to a leader board that tracks 'influence'.
Once a week randomly add or subtract from each cows fake influence numbers and repost the leader board. Even though they all lie about not coming here, the ratking members are so fragile and petty a ranking like that would eat at them like acid.