🌟 Internet Famous Karl Jobst / karljobst / FAQ_GOD / simthreat / approachhernow.com - Albino autist, Spergy speed runner, Pickup predator and Bitch of Mitchell

  • 🔧 Site instability resolved. You can report double-posts and broken attachments. For bigger issues, use the Technical Grievances thread.
    🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Jobst v. Mitchell 0:26-cv-60997 — District Court, S.D. Florida

  • Docket No.
    0:26-cv-60997
  • Court
    District Court, S.D. Florida
  • Filed
    7 de Abr, 2026
  • Nature of Suit
    360 P.I.: Other
  • Cause
    28:1332 Diversity
  • Jurisdiction
    Diversity
  • Jury Demand
    Plaintiff
  • Last Filing
    18 de Jun, 2026

Parties (2)

Parties
William James Mitchell, Karl Jobst

Recent Filings (showing 5 of 27)

# Date Description Filing
24 18 de Jun, 2026 First REPLY in Support of Motion re 17 Defendant's MOTION for Bill of Costs (Security for Costs). filed by William James Mitchell. (Mitchell, Michele) (Entered: 06/19/2026) PDF
23 18 de Jun, 2026 First REPLY in Support of Motion re 16 MOTION to Dismiss 8 Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal . filed by William James Mitchell. (Mitchell, Michele) (Entered: 06/19/2026) PDF
22 16 de Jun, 2026 First STIPULATED MOTION for Substitution of Counsel. Substituting Michele T. Mitchell for Michele T. Mitchell, Esq. at JAMBP&H by William James Mitchell. Responses due by 7/1/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Mitchell, Michele) (Entered: 06/17/2026) 1 2
21 15 de Jun, 2026 DECLARATION OF KARL JOBST IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS re 20 Response in Opposition to Motion by Karl Jobst (ksr) (Entered: 06/16/2026) PDF
20 15 de Jun, 2026 RESPONSE in Opposition re 17 Defendant's MOTION for Bill of Costs (Security for Costs) filed by Karl Jobst. Replies due by 6/23/2026. (ksr) (Entered: 06/16/2026) PDF
View all 27 filings
Destacado
Got to love some of Billy response to Karl.
"Plaintiff’s Opposition rests on the premise that, in the absence of an express Federal Rule of Civil Procedure authorizing security for costs, this Court lacks authority to require a bond. That premise is incorrect."
Karl trying to tell the court they have no authority. Billy lawyer say, actually the court does. Who would have known courts have authorithy.

"It does not authorize a plaintiff to leverage insolvency as both a sword and a shield, pursuing claims while avoiding the risk of an adverse cost award."
We know Karl sword is not strong enough, but Billy lawyer is now trying to take that away.
 
I'm impressed by her restraint.
She carefully crafted this entire document instead of just texting him "shut up and stop crying you absolute mong", because she's professional like that.

AISelect_20260620_034758_Firefox.jpg
 
Destacado
Debes iniciar sesión o registrarte para responder aquí.
Atrás
Top Abajo