🐱 J.K. Rowling Just Won’t Stop Attacking Trans People Online

CatParty

J.K. Rowling is apparently still fixated on portraying transgender women as predators.
In a tweet on Sunday, the Harry Potter author attacked reporting that police in Scotland would record rapes as being committed by a woman if the assailant identifies as female. “War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength,” Rowling tweeted. “The Penised Individual Who Raped You Is a Woman.”

An error occurred while retrieving the Tweet. It might have been deleted.

The comment is only the latest in a string of efforts by the once-beloved author to amplify a narrative that’s not only essentially false but also ignores the devastatingly high level of violence experienced by trans people.
In June 2020, Rowling published a 3,700-word essay about what her fears around what she called the “new trans activism,” accusing trans people of “pushing to erode the legal definition of sex and replace it with gender.” That essay quickly sparked accusations that Rowling was a TERF, or trans-exclusive radical feminist, as Rowling drew on her own experience as a sexual assault survivor to suggest that trans women are a threat to cisgender women.


In the year-plus since, Rowling has sporadically implied that trans people and those who advocate for their rights are dangerous.
But Rowling’s narrative—that trans people are somehow perpetuating an Orwellian takeover—is misleading on multiple fronts. It obscures the fact that it’s cis men, not trans women, who regular commit sexual assault. Only a fraction of a percent of U.S. adults identify as transgender—yet almost one in five women have experienced completed or attempted rape, according to the Centers for Disease Control. (One in 38 men have experienced the same.) For anyone trying to pin the epidemic of assault on trans people, the numbers just don’t add up.
“People will say from one side of their mouth that trans women are an incredibly small part of the population and that the world shouldn't bend to their desires, but will then say that we are so influential and powerful that we must be stopped; specifically to save women from rape,” YouTuber Kat Blaque tweeted after Rowling’s comments.
Blaque added, “Are the only people capable of rape and sexual assault men? Would you define rape solely by penetration? Is sexual violence inherently male?”

An error occurred while retrieving the Tweet. It might have been deleted.

Trans people also face a staggering amount of violence. In a 2015 survey of nearly 28,000 trans adults living in the United States, the National Center for Transgender Equality found that 47 percent of respondents said that they had been sexually assaulted in their life. So far in 2021, at least 50 transgender or gender non-conforming people have been violently killed, according to a tally by the Human Rights Campaign.
Compared to cisgender people, trans people are more than four times more likely than cisgender people to experience what the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law, in a 2021 study, called “violent victimization.” That includes becoming victims of assault and rape.
“The biggest threats of violence against women has always been cis gender men,” Queer Eye star Jonathan Van Ness tweeted. “Not trans women, unless JK’s constant transphobic cherry picked vitriol convinces you otherwise. But as trans women are assaulted, deprived of work, killed, and raped JK is safe in her mansion.”
 
Honestly, I always love the JK Rowling stuff. The part that is always at the forefront is how Harry Potter is for whatever stupid reason some kind of progressive bible, so every time Rowling says something they can't possibly conceive as agreeable they have to have a meltdown and justify separating the artist from the art which is something they never ever do for anyone they disagree with which is just hilarious. The other half is how Rowling was considered some kind of left wing hero and let it go to her head, but because she has her foot halfway in logic regarding tranny rapist she has to endure fighting the very beast she was a part of and maybe consider how maybe it wasn't a proper thing to be.

In the end they are both extremely up their own ass and their infighting leads to frustration and unhappiness for them that makes me happy. I can still give Rowling credit for not flipping on the issue to appease the crowd - it is incredibly rare that a rich celebrity isn't an autonomaton who does nothing but parrot whatever progressive talking point is most popular.
Imagine if this manages to redpill JK.
kek

JK Rowling is like the Mel Gibson for trannies, she just can't stop winding them up no matter what she does.
Mel Gibson seems actually based, though. And he makes good movies.
 
Naturally, the article goes on an unrelated tangent. It never addresses the problem of men raping women and then being put in prison with more women to rape. It instead says "what about poor trannies who are victims!"

That may be so (for argument's sake, but it isn't), but stay on fucking topic, cowardly faggots.
 
J.K. Rowling has been trying to empathize with the LGBT alphabet for almost a decade. I genuinely think that her adding new information came from a good place to a large degree (i.e., statistically there ARE gay people at Hogwarts, so I should say that to add representation), and was not merely an attempt to stay relevant (still likely). The LGBTs were, unsurprisingly, not impressed by this, and, instead of embracing an ally with open arms, merely demanded more more MORE, like the piggies they are, playing "now-I-got-you-you-son-of-a-bitch" over and over as J.K. tried desperately to listen, to understand to the plights of the perpetually unappeasable, and to try to string together some coherent understanding of the continuous contradictions.

Alas, as is typical with the LGBT, enough is never enough when your demands for others stems from deep self-hatred. Eventually the intelligent people say, "these people are fucked." And that is what our dear J.K. did. And what's better, despite all the troon sperging against her, she is probably the most culturally relevant and culturally adored she has been since 2011.

A heroic arc, truly.
 
double standards? author probably thinks it's not rape if it's a tranny

1639573058728.png
 
JK Rowling is a machine of untrained amateur writing
It was the perfect storm for the time, with a large pool of amateur readers looking for something simple but appearing to have depth, to latch onto
 
Última edición:
Can we please declare this literal Br*t*sh autistic far-left single mother terf boomer as a cow already? What more does she have to do-- collaborate with Chris on a Sonichu Potter mashup?

Surely there must be one stall left in the barn where we could house her. Why does she not have a dedicated thread yet?

Let's get it rolling.
 
Can we please declare this literal Br*t*sh autistic far-left single mother terf boomer as a cow already? What more does she have to do-- collaborate with Chris on a Sonichu Potter mashup?

Surely there must be one stall left in the barn where we could house her. Why does she not have a dedicated thread yet?

Let's get it rolling.
Have you dilated today yet?
 
When is she going to take in some migrants she loves so much into her walled estate? Hope she's raped by migrants instead of the thousands of British Children.
 
Can we please declare this literal Br*t*sh autistic far-left single mother terf boomer as a cow already? What more does she have to do-- collaborate with Chris on a Sonichu Potter mashup?

Surely there must be one stall left in the barn where we could house her. Why does she not have a dedicated thread yet?

Let's get it rolling.
We kinda have a megathread for all the HP shenanigans when all she did was making characters gay. We need a official one.
 
This comes after her "Dumbledore was gay" in a book without sex(or ANY meaningful relationships for that old fuck, but it certainly seems creepy with how fixated he was on Harry directly), and "I never said Hermoine was white, I meant she was black but forgot to define her as such!". Her messaging was pretty fucking stupid on both those points, so while I currently agree with her feminist, put-trannies-in-their-place statements I can't trust the hag.
Somewhat related but do any current/former Percy Jackson fans remember when Rick Riordan suddenly shoehorned Nico being gay into the sequel series? Pretty sure I stopped reading after that book.
So, do you guys like Harry Potter? Don't be shy to admit it, I do.
Never read the books but I recently got to watch the movies for the first time with some friends and I enjoyed it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo