🐱 J.K. Rowling Just Won’t Stop Attacking Trans People Online

CatParty

J.K. Rowling is apparently still fixated on portraying transgender women as predators.
In a tweet on Sunday, the Harry Potter author attacked reporting that police in Scotland would record rapes as being committed by a woman if the assailant identifies as female. “War is Peace. Freedom is Slavery. Ignorance is Strength,” Rowling tweeted. “The Penised Individual Who Raped You Is a Woman.”

An error occurred while retrieving the Tweet. It might have been deleted.

The comment is only the latest in a string of efforts by the once-beloved author to amplify a narrative that’s not only essentially false but also ignores the devastatingly high level of violence experienced by trans people.
In June 2020, Rowling published a 3,700-word essay about what her fears around what she called the “new trans activism,” accusing trans people of “pushing to erode the legal definition of sex and replace it with gender.” That essay quickly sparked accusations that Rowling was a TERF, or trans-exclusive radical feminist, as Rowling drew on her own experience as a sexual assault survivor to suggest that trans women are a threat to cisgender women.


In the year-plus since, Rowling has sporadically implied that trans people and those who advocate for their rights are dangerous.
But Rowling’s narrative—that trans people are somehow perpetuating an Orwellian takeover—is misleading on multiple fronts. It obscures the fact that it’s cis men, not trans women, who regular commit sexual assault. Only a fraction of a percent of U.S. adults identify as transgender—yet almost one in five women have experienced completed or attempted rape, according to the Centers for Disease Control. (One in 38 men have experienced the same.) For anyone trying to pin the epidemic of assault on trans people, the numbers just don’t add up.
“People will say from one side of their mouth that trans women are an incredibly small part of the population and that the world shouldn't bend to their desires, but will then say that we are so influential and powerful that we must be stopped; specifically to save women from rape,” YouTuber Kat Blaque tweeted after Rowling’s comments.
Blaque added, “Are the only people capable of rape and sexual assault men? Would you define rape solely by penetration? Is sexual violence inherently male?”

An error occurred while retrieving the Tweet. It might have been deleted.

Trans people also face a staggering amount of violence. In a 2015 survey of nearly 28,000 trans adults living in the United States, the National Center for Transgender Equality found that 47 percent of respondents said that they had been sexually assaulted in their life. So far in 2021, at least 50 transgender or gender non-conforming people have been violently killed, according to a tally by the Human Rights Campaign.
Compared to cisgender people, trans people are more than four times more likely than cisgender people to experience what the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law, in a 2021 study, called “violent victimization.” That includes becoming victims of assault and rape.
“The biggest threats of violence against women has always been cis gender men,” Queer Eye star Jonathan Van Ness tweeted. “Not trans women, unless JK’s constant transphobic cherry picked vitriol convinces you otherwise. But as trans women are assaulted, deprived of work, killed, and raped JK is safe in her mansion.”
 
B00F54E5-CAC6-4950-9007-310BA62340D9.png

This thread was all over Scottish Twitter yesterday. BTFO by the Terven Witches, solicitors, journalists, gays, lesbians. Looks like he deleted some- if I find an archive, I'll post it.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 2800813
This thread was all over Scottish Twitter yesterday. BTFO by the Terven Witches, solicitors, journalists, gays, lesbians. Looks like he deleted some- if I find an archive, I'll post it.
How does someone "falsely" claim to be trans when anyone can claim to be trans and be considered "valid"? There's literally no gatekeeping anymore.

Just like all the troon sex offenses being reported as "women" having committed them, when in reality it's really men in dresses and cheap weaves.
 
She may as well Avada Kadabra True and Honest Women everywhere.
 
Harry Potter is actually based. JK Rowling is also based.
 
The other half is how Rowling was considered some kind of left wing hero and let it go to her head, but because she has her foot halfway in logic regarding tranny rapist she has to endure fighting the very beast she was a part of and maybe consider how maybe it wasn't a proper thing to be.

In the end they are both extremely up their own ass and their infighting leads to frustration and unhappiness for them that makes me happy.
I think there's a difference between your typical woke leftist dipshit and people like Rowling.

I think most woke leftist dipshits don't actually believe much in what they argue for. They're more into it for the fight and to attack the "bad people". They want to be the heroes in the war movie. Because of this, they're incredibly hypocritical (so, like screeching about communism while waiting in line at the apple store for the next iphone).

With Rowling, I think she actually does hold the ideals that she does. I think her ideals are often stupid, but I think they're sincerely held and she's willing to stick to her guns on them. I can respect that.

So while she's on board with most of the woke dipshit's claimed ideals, they caught her disagreeing with the party line and went into a frothing rage. And she has not backed down.

In fact, it's hilarious, a couple years ago, they even tried to send a mobile wrongthink reeducation squad to her house to pester her about this shit and get her to recant. She said no thanks, lol.
A rep from GLAAD also tells Variety that the organization reached out to Rowling’s PR team and offered to facilitate an off-the-record discussion between the best-selling author and members of the trans community. Rowling’s reps declined.
(also goddamn, that was two years ago)
How does someone "falsely" claim to be trans when anyone can claim to be trans and be considered "valid"? There's literally no gatekeeping anymore.

Just like all the troon sex offenses being reported as "women" having committed them, when in reality it's really men in dresses and cheap weaves.
Seriously. I thought there was no wrong way to be a woman and if someone identifies as a woman, they're a woman? What changed?
 
My what a messy divorce this has been.... but they say those who were the most passionate to start end up the bitterest of rivals.
 
Now she just needs to disown Cursed Child and the niggerwashing of Hermione, then maybe the franchise can start to become palatable again. I doubt it though, especially with the talks of a TV series being made, as soon as you see a darker skinned Hermione (even an interracial mutt one) you will know if it's passed saving or not.
You aren't seeing a black Hermione outside of the play. And only then because it was the best person they could find.

JK is not going to blackwash a main character in anything she knows actually matters.
 
In a 2015 survey of nearly 28,000 trans adults living in the United States, the National Center for Transgender Equality found that 47 percent of respondents said that they had been sexually assaulted in their life. So far in 2021, at least 50 transgender or gender non-conforming people have been violently killed, according to a tally by the Human Rights Campaign.
50. Out of a population of about 1.4 million in the US. Is .003% chance of being murdered. Compared to .005% for the average person. The average person is nearly twice as liekly to be murdered than a trans person. So shut up.
 
it's refreshing that J.K. actually sticks with her beliefs and principles regardless of all this bullshit.
This comes after her "Dumbledore was gay" in a book without sex(or ANY meaningful relationships for that old fuck, but it certainly seems creepy with how fixated he was on Harry directly), and "I never said Hermoine was white, I meant she was black but forgot to define her as such!". Her messaging was pretty fucking stupid on both those points, so while I currently agree with her feminist, put-trannies-in-their-place statements I can't trust the hag.
 
This comes after her "Dumbledore was gay" in a book without sex(or ANY meaningful relationships for that old fuck, but it certainly seems creepy with how fixated he was on Harry directly), and "I never said Hermoine was white, I meant she was black but forgot to define her as such!". Her messaging was pretty fucking stupid on both those points, so while I currently agree with her feminist, put-trannies-in-their-place statements I can't trust the hag.
Yeah, that was a little strange. I feel like the Dumbledore is gay thing was just a toss in after the fact because Dumbledore once had a close male friend who grew to be a powerful evil wizard that he had to defeat in the 1940's. We know how much fangirls will think that males who are close friends or bitter enemies just have to be gay for one another. No way in hell two males can have any sort of close association with one another without wanting to also fuck each other. J.K. probably noticed this in some of the female fans and either liked the idea herself or was regretting not making her cast more progressive earlier so he was retroactively made gay.
 
So, do you guys like Harry Potter? Don't be shy to admit it, I do. It's acceptable reading material, and it's refreshing that J.K. actually sticks with her beliefs and principles regardless of all this bullshit.

A wizard is born a wizard and can never be a witch. A witch is born a witch and can never be a wizard.
The first three books were okay, after that I thought they started getting too dark.
 
So, do you guys like Harry Potter? Don't be shy to admit it, I do. It's acceptable reading material, and it's refreshing that J.K. actually sticks with her beliefs and principles regardless of all this bullshit.

A wizard is born a wizard and can never be a witch. A witch is born a witch and can never be a wizard.
Harry Potter is like the Shonen anime of literature.
 
This comes after her "Dumbledore was gay" in a book without sex(or ANY meaningful relationships for that old fuck, but it certainly seems creepy with how fixated he was on Harry directly), and "I never said Hermoine was white, I meant she was black but forgot to define her as such!". Her messaging was pretty fucking stupid on both those points, so while I currently agree with her feminist, put-trannies-in-their-place statements I can't trust the hag.
The virtue signaling was all fine and good, until it finally required her to deny her own biological gender and embrace degeneracy, only THEN, when "strong independent woman" was a label that men in dresses with hairy legs could use too, was it a problem.....

She's right, but the fact she only opposed the Troon Army when it came for her is indeed telling.

It's no different than Italy throwing in the towel and forking Mussolini over only happened AFTER the Allies established a firm beachhead at Anzio. Sure, NOW you see the light..... I'm sure the fact your days were numbered if you didn't submit was just a happy coincidence.
 
JK Rowling is a machine of untrained amateur writing

And also a machine of slaying troons

Despite her general lack of talent she has had marvelous success with both
 
Men telling women they have no say in what the term woman means will never not be amusing


Its going to be very comforting for the woman whos just been raped when she keeps getting corrected every time she refers to her attacker as a dude.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo