- Registrado
- 10 de Jun, 2016
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Hmm. It just occurred to me, that like the writers, I kind of forgot how the white walkers pretty much needed one of Daenerys dragons to take down the wall in order for them to pass. Then again, maybe they could have just had Jon convince Daenerys to come with him North along with her dragons (perhaps with him on one too just for some levity) to see that the white walkers did exist only of course to get ambushed. Certainly that would have been better than convincing her with cave drawings/etches. In fact, how was he able to convince her with some random cave drawings/etches...wtf. Seriously?
Daenarys comes to Westeros a la Henry Bolingbroke with Dorne/Highgarden/Yara & her Ironborn in addition to the Unsullied & Dothraki backing her up. Without the White Walker/Night's King to make a dent in her plans it's a little too hard to start suddenly portraying her as crazy, unhinged and unfit to rule.Nothing about the White Walker storyline makes sense.
Honestly my interpretation of GRRM's historical allusion schtick was that it was a War of the Roses style civil war that slowly but steadily merged with a Black Death style apocalypse in the threat of the White Walkers, with various other bits of medieval and ancient world trivia scattered in for good measureDaenarys comes to Westeros a la Henry Bolingbroke with Dorne/Highgarden/Yara & her Ironborn in addition to the Unsullied & Dothraki backing her up. Without the White Walker/Night's King to make a dent in her plans it's a little too hard to start suddenly portraying her as crazy, unhinged and unfit to rule.
Martin has referenced the War of the Roses countless times and if he's using the York & Lancaster dynasties as reference most readers would assume that tyrant/disgruntled nobles = deposed monarch/new monarch crowned. I assume he's using the White Walkers to shake things up a bit. But in the hands of D&D it's executed badly and makes no sense; after all, the theme of the show was "Winter Is Coming" and in the end winter was just a couple of weeks of snow.
And nothing in the previous episodes prevents portraying Daenarys as a bad ruler and being deposed after taking the Iron Throne. It's not so much the denouement (glossing over the Others was a bad idea), its how they got there that's pissing off fans.
He's referencing different Plantagenet personages throughout ASOIAF, Tywin reminds me of the Earl of Warwick at times then of the Duke of Gloucester at others. I think he maybe did intend the Others to be like the Black Death (which is clearly analogous to the Pale Mare illness in Slaver's Bay) in the societal change it forces upon the nobility and guilds/villeins. But Martin introduced dragons/fantasy, magic and Others/scifi elements and he's stuck in resolving the overall plot and conclusion.Honestly my interpretation of GRRM's historical allusion schtick was that it was a War of the Roses style civil war that slowly but steadily merged with a Black Death style apocalypse in the threat of the White Walkers, with various other bits of medieval and ancient world trivia scattered in for good measure
And by "Black Death style apocalypse" I mean something that straight up wipes out atleast half the population and causes major wars and conflicts to grind to a halt as those involved wind up dead or fled, but does eventually pass, and while the old conflicts start back up again the world is irreversibly changed as the surviving peasants wind up a whole lot more powerful and influential in the new order and combined with the decimation of the nobility this results in the medieval/feudal way of life steadily dying off and replaced with tentative steps towards modernity.
Assuming the whole "grand council" bullshit has some roots in GRRM's bulletpoints he gave D&D I suspect that what I mentioned will probably be a factor in the epilogue of the final book, and this kind of council will be paired with other things to show how westerosi feudalism is dying off
What did he guess? Cursory googling brings up, may Allah forgive me for uttering these words, the Big Bang theory for some reason.William Shatner guessed right, but Shatner is a fucking troll so my money is he read the spoilers.
The sex scenes in GoT were an invention of the show, it's not as prominent in the books.Hmm. You guys responses weren't as bad as I'd thought they would (then again I knew I was taking a wild stab there). On a side note, are any of you aware of Final Fantasy Tactics and if so what do you think of it vs Game of Thrones/A Song of Fire and Ice.
I personally prefer FFT. It was far more concise, straight-forward, didn't have pointless sex scenes or characters clearly spouting off one liners for the audience amusement (well except in battle), good characters and a good story with a sort of tragic feel for at least 2 characters but above all embraced the genre of the story Interesting enough, it came out over a year after ASoIaF started.
I could buy that those are just spears he has on-hand all the time, but if his aim is that good why didn't he just snipe Jon on one of the many opportunities he had to do so?How did the Night King know to have anti-dragon spears with him when he confronted Jon above the Wall?
Why is it so necessary to push politics in to a TV show about dragons and ice zombies?
Why did the Trump Derangement syndrome tank GOT, and why did it leave MCU unscathed?
IMO, GRRM got overwhelmed by the massive world-building of Westeros, which has resulted in the stagnation of the novels that we see to this day.