Disney's Cruella - because we need to sympathize with the animal abuser

  • 🇵🇦 Nuestro primer dominio localizado está en español en kiwifarms.pa. Our first localized domain is on Spanish on kiwifarms.pa.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I watched this dogshit today cause I wanted to laugh at it.

It is bad.

Also comparing Arthur Fleck. a character you feel sympathy for but at the same time feel uncomfortable and terrified by to this boring ass Cruella who I felt nothing for is one of the worst takes I have seen.

Not to mention Joaquin Phoenix is on another level compared to Emma Stone.
 
Yes because Joker wanted to be a story that glamorized the Joker and secretly make him a good guy all along. That's what it wanted to be. It's pretty pathetic honestly and it really shouldn't be compared to Joker as they have nothing in common beyond being villain origin movies.
 
So I was wrong. It's a pretty enjoyable movie. Emma Stone is good and reminded me a lot of Eva Green in Dark Shadows. The idea that they're trying to redeem Cruella isn't quite true - I don't want to give spoilers but at the end she's pretty much confirmed "bad", though admittedly she hasn't yet skinned any dogs (just joked about it). I really liked the period aesthetic which they obviously went to a lot of trouble over right down to old-fashioned mopeds and small, portable black and white TVs (remember those? Pepperidge Farms People over 40 do). I have always found Emma Thompson unlikeable so she works well as the villain for me. It starts off as what you might think of as some rebellious girl trope who is punished for being independent and different, but it moves beyond that pretty quickly, imo. Also, Cruella's scheming is actually pretty clever, especially her final masterplan. Credit where it's due - the script has proper, old-fashioned twists and turns done well.

I don't think I've ever seen the Disney film, nor read the books. So perhaps that's factored in. I get that she's an irredeemable villain but here's the thing - this whole thread has been lamenting that it's trying to make her not that. And whilst it gives her good aspects and positions her in a kind of hero role through circumstances, I really don't think it does. The comparison to Joker is a good one. You get to see her awful origins, she's placed in a situation where you sympathise with her and by the end she has embraced her role. It's just that one film has more CGI dogs.

Emma Stone looks great in a succession of awesome outfits. The film is kind of Absolutely Fabulous meets Agatha Christie. I really enjoyed the fashion aspects of it. Especially the garbage truck stunt. She is really engaging, really bold and you like her without actually wanting to know her. A lot of what has been mocked in this thread, like Arthur writing the song at the end or "Cruella" being a nickname from her mum, really isn't a big deal in the film and honestly, works fine.

Also, thanks the gods, she's not some "LOL, so random and quirky" Harley Quinn type character who grow to hate more and more. She is actually rational and smart and not just a darling of the plot gods who gets a free pass on everything because she's "a strong, independent wahmen". Nor does she get a moral pass on everything just because she's the "hero" like aforementioned Harley Quinn.

Anyway, one lone voice saying they enjoyed the movie and defying the prevailing fashions. Much like Cruella. ;)


1622361345858.png


1622361538049.png

1622361317738.png
 

Archivos adjuntos

  • 1622361391397.png
    1622361391397.png
    669.2 KB · Vistas: 54
  • 1622361470096.png
    1622361470096.png
    1.3 MB · Vistas: 47
The Rotten Tomatos score looks sketchy as fuck, especially since it's "verified reviews". After all, that's slang for "people with approved opinions", that Rotten Tomatos introduced after some Disney Movie got reviewbombed for being trash. Just a little reminder: The Rise of Skywalker's "verified" rating is still bolted down on 86% after 2 fucking years. There's clearly some bullshit going on here.

But extremely niche movies always have ratings that make it hard to really guess how good the movie actually is. Say you look up the score of some movie that appeals only to a very small niche of hardcore fans, the movie will be well-received, cause the people watching it are pretty much already on board with it before it even came out.
With Cruella, it might be a supposedly mass-appeal movie, but afaik, you need to pay for it still, so the ones watching it now are the shitgargling retards that mindlessly consoom whatever trash Disney throws their way... so the rating is entirely meaningless, the ones rating are braindead drones anyway and they are carefully handpicked for the "verified" pool.

Right? This feels like something written for Robot Chicken!
I mean, one of the most common throwaway jokes about someone disliking something is "You know I hate/fear [x]. [x] killed my family!"

I lost it.

This movie is such a mess. But I do wonder, would it be good without the dalmatians shit thrust into it as a movie entirely its own thing?
Like, make the mother's death less goofy, remove all dalmatians from it and have it just be some outsider chick making her way into the world of fashion? I could see that work out and maybe the movie would be decent then, even.
 
So I was wrong. It's a pretty enjoyable movie. Emma Stone is good and reminded me a lot of Eva Green in Dark Shadows. The idea that they're trying to redeem Cruella isn't quite true - I don't want to give spoilers but at the end she's pretty much confirmed "bad", though admittedly she hasn't yet skinned any dogs (just joked about it). I really liked the period aesthetic which they obviously went to a lot of trouble over right down to old-fashioned mopeds and small, portable black and white TVs (remember those? Pepperidge Farms People over 40 do). I have always found Emma Thompson unlikeable so she works well as the villain for me. It starts off as what you might think of as some rebellious girl trope who is punished for being independent and different, but it moves beyond that pretty quickly, imo. Also, Cruella's scheming is actually pretty clever, especially her final masterplan. Credit where it's due - the script has proper, old-fashioned twists and turns done well.

I don't think I've ever seen the Disney film, nor read the books. So perhaps that's factored in. I get that she's an irredeemable villain but here's the thing - this whole thread has been lamenting that it's trying to make her not that. And whilst it gives her good aspects and positions her in a kind of hero role through circumstances, I really don't think it does. The comparison to Joker is a good one. You get to see her awful origins, she's placed in a situation where you sympathise with her and by the end she has embraced her role. It's just that one film has more CGI dogs.

Emma Stone looks great in a succession of awesome outfits. The film is kind of Absolutely Fabulous meets Agatha Christie. I really enjoyed the fashion aspects of it. Especially the garbage truck stunt. She is really engaging, really bold and you like her without actually wanting to know her. A lot of what has been mocked in this thread, like Arthur writing the song at the end or "Cruella" being a nickname from her mum, really isn't a big deal in the film and honestly, works fine.

Also, thanks the gods, she's not some "LOL, so random and quirky" Harley Quinn type character who grow to hate more and more. She is actually rational and smart and not just a darling of the plot gods who gets a free pass on everything because she's "a strong, independent wahmen". Nor does she get a moral pass on everything just because she's the "hero" like aforementioned Harley Quinn.

Anyway, one lone voice saying they enjoyed the movie and defying the prevailing fashions. Much like Cruella. ;)


Ver archivo adjunto 2215323

Ver archivo adjunto 2215328
Ver archivo adjunto 2215322
If nothing else the design of Cruella in this movie is cool.

I’m sorry, I don’t know how good the movie may or may not be, but “Dalmatians pushed my mommy off a cliff” makes me instantly not care in the slightest.
It's incredibly lazy.

This movie is such a mess. But I do wonder, would it be good without the dalmatians shit thrust into it as a movie entirely its own thing?
Like, make the mother's death less goofy, remove all dalmatians from it and have it just be some outsider chick making her way into the world of fashion? I could see that work out and maybe the movie would be decent then, even.
If they wanted to maker a good guy they should have just avoided the topic of Dalmatians altogether.

I mean giving her a reason to hate Dalmatians really does imply she's going to try to make them into a coat later on, doesn't it?
 
If nothing else the design of Cruella in this movie is cool.

Very definitely. I'm not exactly a fashion fan but it was actually pretty great seeing her designs and her stunts right down to that shop window display. It actually made me like fashion for 90 minutes.
It's incredibly lazy.
Eh, it's not really the case that "Dalmations pushed my mum from a cliff, I hate dalmations now". For a start, she doesn't set out at all to take revenge on dogs. And she actually ends up stealing and keeping the dalmations for herself flatly contradicting the idea that she is now some dog-hating fiend because of it.

If they wanted to maker a good guy they should have just avoided the topic of Dalmatians altogether.

I mean giving her a reason to hate Dalmatians really does imply she's going to try to make them into a coat later on, doesn't it?
Except, as I spoilered above, she doesn't seem to hate dalmations. At least not in any simple and obvious way. Still, there is left open the possibility she might at the end. I really can't get into more detail without spoiling the movie for people who haven't watched it though. And it's a fun watch.

I already get the feeling this is gonna have a Ghostbusters 2016 style cult (in every sense of the word) following. I remember seeing a tweet by some cosplay THOT who's name I don't remember saying she was in tears after Ghostbusters ended and rated it 10/10.

I doubt it. Ghostbusters 2016 is one of the biggest trashfires I have ever seen and it needs a cult-like mentality in order to defend it. Cruella is a decent movie. And whilst it has a few feminist tropes at the start it's not really much of a "strong wahmen" movie. G2016 became the hill to die on because when it was first announced there was going to be an all-female remake - especially that it was a remake and not a sequel - got some attacks from the MIGTOW sorts causing feminists to push back hard for being sexist with some justification. Then the trailers came out and it really did look like utter shit and then suddenly everyone was saying it was bad and instead of the online feminists conceding defeat they then started calling anyone who criticized the movie a sexist which unfortunately for the feminists was literally everyone because the film was garbage. Worst possible hill to die on but they did anyway.

I don't see that happening with Cruella because outside of a few places that farm outrage most people are going to go into the movie without a social agenda and, frankly, enjoy it.

Don't be like the feminists who defended Ghostbusters 2016 even after they found it was a terrible movie, by continuing to attack this movie after it turns out to be quite good.
 
Última edición:
Ver archivo adjunto 2214367
>can't answer why it needed an origin story
>good movie because "visually dazzling" and women

:story:

Ver archivo adjunto 2214373
Audience score looks bought for, Tomatometer is higher than Joker's.
Audiences are dumb as fuck. I watched the Mitchells VS. The Machines recently, because the audience score was like, 98%. That movie ended up being just kind of okay. Not offensively bad, not bad enough to be hilarious, not good enough to be memorable in any way, but it did pull a couple laughs out of me over its two hour runtime. I used to work with a woman who, no question, would have raved about how great she found this movie, because she can't stop sucking Mickey's dong. Even if the score isn't paid for, there are a lot of Disney adults out there who love anything the mouse cranks out, regardless of quality
 
So I was wrong. It's a pretty enjoyable movie. Emma Stone is good and reminded me a lot of Eva Green in Dark Shadows. The idea that they're trying to redeem Cruella isn't quite true - I don't want to give spoilers but at the end she's pretty much confirmed "bad", though admittedly she hasn't yet skinned any dogs (just joked about it). I really liked the period aesthetic which they obviously went to a lot of trouble over right down to old-fashioned mopeds and small, portable black and white TVs (remember those? Pepperidge Farms People over 40 do). I have always found Emma Thompson unlikeable so she works well as the villain for me. It starts off as what you might think of as some rebellious girl trope who is punished for being independent and different, but it moves beyond that pretty quickly, imo. Also, Cruella's scheming is actually pretty clever, especially her final masterplan. Credit where it's due - the script has proper, old-fashioned twists and turns done well.

I don't think I've ever seen the Disney film, nor read the books. So perhaps that's factored in. I get that she's an irredeemable villain but here's the thing - this whole thread has been lamenting that it's trying to make her not that. And whilst it gives her good aspects and positions her in a kind of hero role through circumstances, I really don't think it does. The comparison to Joker is a good one. You get to see her awful origins, she's placed in a situation where you sympathise with her and by the end she has embraced her role. It's just that one film has more CGI dogs.

Emma Stone looks great in a succession of awesome outfits. The film is kind of Absolutely Fabulous meets Agatha Christie. I really enjoyed the fashion aspects of it. Especially the garbage truck stunt. She is really engaging, really bold and you like her without actually wanting to know her. A lot of what has been mocked in this thread, like Arthur writing the song at the end or "Cruella" being a nickname from her mum, really isn't a big deal in the film and honestly, works fine.

Also, thanks the gods, she's not some "LOL, so random and quirky" Harley Quinn type character who grow to hate more and more. She is actually rational and smart and not just a darling of the plot gods who gets a free pass on everything because she's "a strong, independent wahmen". Nor does she get a moral pass on everything just because she's the "hero" like aforementioned Harley Quinn.

Anyway, one lone voice saying they enjoyed the movie and defying the prevailing fashions. Much like Cruella. ;)


Ver archivo adjunto 2215323

Ver archivo adjunto 2215328
Ver archivo adjunto 2215322
The question your post raises is why it's even related to the original story. If anything, knowing the main protagonist is a villain only ruins the reveal in the end.

It's like making a war films set in ww1 that shows Hitler's military career. Only that at least that is somewhat interesting because it's a non fictional character.
 
Yeah, I am pretty sure that Space Jam 2, will be a more bigger trashfire than Cruella, especially since it has some controversy behind it.
Oh absolutely, that's something I want to watch just down to how awful it'll be. Cruella was average and I think the comparisons to Joker hurt it more than anything else, Cruella is much more of a bland drama with some comedy from time to time. Really the only similarity to Joker is that the main character is a recognizable villain.
 
Cackling with laughter over Cruella's backstory being that her mom was pushed off a cliff by Dalmatians.

As movie scriptwriting goes, it is up there with "somehow, Palpatine has returned."

That's it? I was expecting something like "Daddy had a dalmation and it had to be in the room while he touched me wrong" or something that at least might make some sort of sense.

These "edgy" retellings of children's stories are often just like some teen's stupid fanfiction.

Why not do one of those medieval fairy tales as it was originally written? Those are actually pretty horrifying. You don't even need to change anything. Although I guess all the rape and pedowolves might have to go or be toned down a bit.
 
I watched the scene with the Baroness on youtube & thougt it was good (besides the music). Now I'm interested in the whole movie but I'm not going to give Disnsy money of course. Gonna pirate it.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo