Yes, but we consider the best examples ones like these:
Ver archivo adjunto 9141323
Ver archivo adjunto 9141324
Ver archivo adjunto 9141326
Because, once again, for their time - they're of high quality an clearly represent the things they were drawn to be.
This brings up a, idk, kinda cool thought. What's the difference between a painting and a symbol. Because they do clearly represent the things they were meant to be and I'm pretty certain it was to communicate. In their time, our ancestors probably didn't care for artistic thought and high concept bullshit. It's pragmatic and practical. Warnings of the ones that wear feathers. Predators, Prey, tools, etc. It has nothing to do with excellence or whatever strange, enigmatic, fuschia miasma thick as tar purple prose bullshit you're spewin' in the low tide pier of your mind. Not to mention the fetid beached whales whose stink is the cologne in which you bathe in as performance art called, the Aristocrats.
The romanticism of this conundrum of what is art is the nearest thing to a nuclear bomb to creativity. This is why I hate academia. The old masters were masters for pragmatic reasons too; there wasn't photography. When photography became popular, it wasn't considered art because it was a representation of reality. Problem is, those bitches usually got altered to fuck. You used to have to be good with charcoal drawing and being able to draw in negative to dodge and burn these negatives. Is it not art now? No.
It was a scientific novelty that transferred from chemist to chemist to physicist to physicist, until it finally became a practical alternative to paintings. But I argue, and I haven't heard any of these high paid blow hards with doctorates in art's and philosophy even consider this, the creation of photography is no different then the entire history of pigment craft condensed in a more efficient system of communication; a blend of pragmatism and creativity in symbiosis.
Where was AI art 6 years ago? it's been passed around to researchers, CS fuckboys and their Cracker gooner friend, cracking FF87 in 3 hours before release, evolving alongside the development of copilot, love it or hate it, and others like it; practical with the creative. With AI, it already doesn't matter the what or how; even the most talented node mapper in comfyui will become obsolete eventually. History doesn't echo, it doesn't mirror, it reverberates with each leap forward and will continue to repeat this cycle until we meet God. To boil down what constitutes art to "Excellence" is laughably naive.
There, now we have three perspective of what is art, one who claims all is art, one who claims all technique and the other who claims none of it matters and everything matters until annihilation. We have achieved entropy in the thread, we can accelerate forward now. What an absurd situation.