- Registrado
- 19 de Abr, 2019
Come on, AI, please crash. 
Sigue el video de abajo para ver cómo instalar nuestro sitio como una aplicación web en tu pantalla de inicio.
Nota: Esta función puede no estar disponible en algunos navegadores.
Come on, AI, please crash.![]()
Not going to happen, not anytime soon at least. Minimum 5 years, all these companies and whatnot put all their eggs in this basket and they'll be damned if they're not going to make it last. Even when it does crash, we'll probably see (even more) economic turmoil, and given the equipment they're using probably isn't too compatible with a lot of consumer products, we won't see anything given out either. Best case for that specifically is that they're recycled, worst case they're dumped somewhere and no one is allowed to touch it.Hope this means RAM will be cheap again soon.
Would be the funniest thing IMO. Not that I like AI, I think most implementations of it suck, but the meltdowns would be hilarious.Did it crash yet?
Ver archivo adjunto 8546089
ArchiveAI.com's $85 million Super Bowl ad campaign falls foul as traffic crashes servers — the campaign allegedly cost $15 million for the ads, $70 million for the domain name
News
By Luke James published February 9, 2026
Firm's CEO insists he had 'prepared for scale, but not for THIS.'
(Image credit: Future)
Share this article
AI.com bought its way onto the biggest advertising stage in the world on Sunday night, running a fourth-quarter Super Bowl ad spot that told tens of millions of sports fans worldwide to head to the site and create a handle. Hyped-up viewers arrived in droves, and then the site crashed.
Within minutes of the ad airing, users across social platforms reported that AI.com was either unreachable or stuck in failed sign-up loops, turning what was meant to be the site’s big launch moment into an unexpected stress test that failed right before the eyes of millions. The company soon restored its service, but first impressions count.
In a post on X.com, co-founder and CEO Kris Marszalek, best known as the CEO of Crypto.com, said that the company had “prepared for scale, but not for THIS,” later attributing the disruption to external factors outside the company’s control. Marszalek later wrote that the website was “hitting Google rate limits (which are at their absolute global maximum).”
You may like
Big Tech stocks take a $1 trillion tumble as projected AI spending continues to outweigh revenue
Cloudflare says it has fended off 416 billion AI bot scrape requests in five months
Anthropic signs $30 billion deal with Amazon to deploy Claude on AWS
See more
That excuse might sound like your typical tech bro attempt to pass the buck to somebody else, but there’s some plausibility to his claim given how AI.com’s onboarding works. At launch, the site funnels new users through a single “continue with Google” authentication option. Once millions of users suddenly arrived and began attempting to create their AI agents, Google may have begun throttling requests, effectively making the site unusable.
For a company that reportedly spent $70 million to secure the AI.com domain — a level of investment that suggests it’s a business that wants to establish itself as a foundational platform — it’s arguably inexcusable for its first mass-market test to expose a launch stack that had zero redundancy or meaningful margin for error. When the single point of failure gave way in the form of throttled Google authentication requests, it was lights out.
AI.com is selling itself as a way to create personal AI agents that can execute tasks across apps and operate with verifying levels of access depending on subscription tier. That’s an ambitious promise, and that ultimately falls flat when the company behind it can’t even get the basics like user authentication squared away right out of the gate.
According to Adweek, AI accounted for 23% of ads shown during this year’s Super Bowl — a grim statistic for those of us who are fed up with the force-feeding.

I agree that it will play out like that, but not because of rampant Marxism in tech company leadership, but because of capitalism. To be more specific, the bubble will be allowed to deflate only after The Right People have acquired a net short position on everything that will collapse in value, which they haven't yet.Thing is, it's not going to burst as much as just be a slow puncture that nobody notices until it's too late, because all these tech companies are basically Maarxists
We basically agree. I was being pretty heavily facetious, but also speaking in an economic sense and not the ideological sense. The CEOs of these companies definitely wouldn't call themselves Marxists but they are vindicating the analysis of economic principles Marx stipulated, and his criticisms of capitalism.I agree that it will play out like that, but not because of rampant Marxism in tech company leadership, but because of capitalism. To be more specific, the bubble will be allowed to deflate only after The Right People have acquired a net short position on everything that will collapse in value, which they haven't yet.
OpenAI is a private company? They havent gone public yet.OpenAI stock price
They are traded within a circlejerk of connected investors and employees. The "secondary market" / being a "non-IPO".OpenAI is a private company? They havent gone public yet.
Nobody thinks the technology will disappear. A bubble in AI means the same as the dotcom bubble: people are buying up companies at heavily inflated valuations and investing in massive infrastructure without a clear path to what useful service is going to be provided or how to make people pay for it.This technology has far too many real, useful applications for it to just disappear
exactly. Microsoft took 16 years to beat its 1999 high, and tech as a whole took roughly the same amount of time. although if you only look at the dotcom bubble through the rise of PCs i bet you could make the argument that it never bounced back. it took the utility of a 4g smartphones and ipads to really make being "very online" in the way 1999 people predicted for those valuations to make sense.The internet didn't disappear as a technology because the dotcom bubble burst. It just took a while for people to realize what is the actual economy that is going to be built on top of the internet,
They have to be in the game to keep their other divisions relevant.Google and Amazon are both borrowing squllions to build data centers. There's no way they'll get enough ROI to pay it all back.
Ooh let's play-Nobody thinks the technology will disappear. A bubble in AI means the same as the dotcom bubble: people are buying up companies at heavily inflated valuations and investing in massive infrastructure without a clear path to what useful service is going to be provided or how to make people pay for it.
The internet didn't disappear as a technology because the dotcom bubble burst. It just took a while for people to realize what is the actual economy that is going to be built on top of the internet, and the same will be true of AI. OpenAI isn't the Google of AI, it's the altavista of AI. You can still become the Google of AI, if you come up with the right idea now.
I think we're reaching a point of the cyberpunk anime dystopia timeline where the corporations try the same trick as governments. They think they can just borrow, borrow, borrow, and basically never pay it off but magic it away via inflation. Once that house of cards becomes precarious enough, they will effectively be governments, because trying to call in the payments means collapsing entire national economies.Google and Amazon are both borrowing squllions to build data centers. There's no way they'll get enough ROI to pay it all back.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=BxDjTZzN_vw
Wanted to talk about this when I first read it, as a lot of red flags already popped up just reading the article, but decided not to sense it was a massive multi paragraph sperg out, but it came back into my mind so i'll just drop four things:"The AI bubble is popping!" LOL NO U. Wishful thinking.
Meanwhile at Anthropic: https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/building-c-compiler
Anthropic's agents built a C compiler in Rust that can build the Linux kernel, apparently. Five figures expense in token costs.
I'm not saying it's good code or anything, but the number of individuals who could achieve this if given unlimited budget is quite small, and fewer could do it this cheaply. Please do not underestimate the impact this technology will have. The nightmare is far from over.
As much as I would hate to say it, Meta is probably the Google of AI, in the sense of earlier Google, building smaller open weight models that can run on consumer hardware rather than datacenters. Even the smaller LLAMA 3.2 3B perameter model is good enough if your using it with a web search api, or just want to run a local personal assistant to keep tabs of things.You can still become the Google of AI, if you come up with the right idea now.