What was the arrest for

What was chris arrested for

  • The Stolen $750.00 dollars he took from his mothers bank account.

    Votos: 126 61.2%
  • DNA Evidence proving christian shot navey out of his bent duck into his mothers china

    Votos: 80 38.8%

  • Total de votantes
    206
I’m really curious why he was arrested. Seems way too soon for a rape charge given Chris is mental child and mom demented, sussing out facts or rape kit will take awhile.

$750 theft is odd /EPO violation is a long shot for a Sunday night arrest out of county unless the Richmond police just begged Charlottesville to give them something to pick this guy up on because they are tired of all the troll calls.

Unless Josh’s reporting of the theft with screenshots made it super easy for them to file a protection order violation AND the CPD really wanted something to nail Chris on while they investigate the rape charge.
I doubt he even reported him regardless of him saying "I police" tbh. I definitely doubt it's that to.

We DO know the hotel was being spammed with dozens of calls, and the front desk called the police (about what? The retard that phoned said "u know there's a guy who fucked his mom staying there" like what kind of retard shit is that?)
 
Ok is....is it the rape, theft, hotel obnoxiousness? There's a vast, very important difference retard clearly what he's asking. There's almost no chance he was arrested for "dat incest"
If you actually read the post, he violated his EPO by stealing from his mother.
Between this and Reddit doxxing him (which lead to a bunch of people calling the hotel and the hotel/people then calling the cops) here we are.

It was everything put together leading up to this. If no one had called or doxxed, he would not have been found/arrested to begin with despite him violating EPO.
The possible (I say possible because technically there is no physical proof yet) rape of his dementia mother is further icing on the cake. I have no doubts they will run tests/use kits/ and question him about all of this and then some.
 
The arrest was most likely for violating the Protection Order by taking the money.

(Congrats Null, you got Chris Van’d!)

It’s weekend, the wheels of both justice, forensics and medicine tend to grind to a halt around noon Friday.

So it’s probably too early for any rape/incest arrest.
 
Untrue.
Sperm lasts for up to 5 days. If they found live sperm cells there they have enough cause to book him.

That's not exactly what I meant. I may have explained myself poorly.

What I'm saying is they wouldn't have DNA results back yet. A finding of live sperm, with the other stuff, could indeed go toward getting that probable cause arrest warrant I mentioned.
 
If you actually read the post, he violated his EPO by stealing from his mother.
Between this and Reddit doxxing him (which lead to a bunch of people calling the hotel and the hotel/people then calling the cops) here we are.

It was everything put together leading up to this. If no one had called or doxxed, he would not have been found/arrested to begin with despite him violating EPO.
Oh, cool, so you don't know. Yes no shit we know all that happens but that still doesn't mean that's what the arrest was for. Dozens of people were calling the hotel, they could have went because of that then arrested him for something said or done. Maybe they already saw barbs pussy was destroyed. You're completely speculating. You seem to think somehow OP missed literally all the events that happened, vs wanting THE ACTUAL CHARGE.

He also had full control of barbs bank account which doesn't consist of "stealing".
 
Oh, cool, so you don't know. Yes no shit we know all that happens but that still doesn't mean that's what the arrest was for. Dozens of people were calling the hotel, they could have went because of that then arrested him for something said or done. Maybe they already saw barbs pussy was destroyed. You're completely speculating.

He also had full control of barbs bank account which doesn't consist of "stealing".
Then if "no one knows" why does this thread even exist?
If none of this is good enough information for you, who are you asking? Josh? Chris?
 
Did a lil looking about rape kits and this is what I found
New technology, such as DNA, may identify the perpetrator in cases in which evidence is present in the vagina for 3 weeks or more and on clothing for years; therefore, in selected cases, the kit may be completed after 72 hours
It can take up to 3 days, so it is possible that it hasn't been long enough to get full confirmation. Also Chris has stated he's been using condoms though that could be a lie, and most likely barb doesn't really clean down there after they boink so there is a high chance they could find something if he didn't use a condom.
 
He claimed

He claimed they ALWAYS used condoms, and why would we have reason to doubt this if we believe the rest? If anything they'd just find signs of intercourse and trauma since she's so old

If Chris is smart he’ll shut up until a lawyer shows up, or deny everything and say he was just pranking people online, etc.

Especially since they’re unlikely to find any biological evidence linking Chris if he used condoms. (I assume Chris doesn’t watch police/forensics show, so he probably doesn’t know this.)


Fortunately Chris is dumb, so he’ll probably start blabbing away to the first cop who pulls the: “I don’t think you’re a bad person, give me your side of the story so I can help you!”-routine.


The moral of the story is:

1: Don’t fuck your 80 year old mother.

2: Don’t touch your 80 year old mother down there.

3: Watch less Pony faggotry and more police procedurals juuuust in case you’re ever charged with fucking your 80 year old mother.
 
I’m really curious why he was arrested. Seems way too soon for a rape charge
Is it, though? Too soon for DNA results, sure, but do you really need those for an arrest?

If she was assessed at the hospital and found to be mentally incompetent, his recorded admission to molesting her ought to be enough for an arrest.

If she was found competent and she made the claim, that and the fact that admitted to it ought to be enough for an arrest.

I mean, if I say you stole my truck and you post on Facebook that you stole my truck, they don't need to dust the truck for finger prints to arrest you. They might need that to convict you, but to arrest?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo