Woodstock 99: Peace, Love, and Rage - More wokeshit.

The faggot is lying. I'm sure that's obvious but I'll bite anyway. After Katrina, the place was littered with corpses. Many of which exploded in the water. The feral dogs were eating said corpses and tried to attack everyone on sight. That's worse than a few hippies getting raped and having their shit kicked in. I know a guardsman who was there and you would think he served in Nam. PTSD melted his brain.
It caught me off guard too. Sure, it must have been intense to deal with problems like that at a poorly ran venue with almost half a million people but it's not a natural disaster that claimed thousands of lives. FFS.

BTW, I had no idea this was Moby:

woodstock 3.jpg


Apparently, Moby had a spider sense that shit was going down after he was orchestrating a rave and he his crew took off on Saturday night.
 
Apparently, Moby had a spider sense that shit was going down after he was orchestrating a rave and he his crew took off on Saturday night.

Which sounds like he's trying to puff up what was basically standard operating procedure for these sorts of large scale festivals that featured a laundry list of bands.

One site festivals typically have artists air dropped in and then immediately pulled out once they're done their set. Logistically, you can't have 30-40 bands, gear, techies, etc. all just sitting around while the bands hang out backstage. It's a rotating carousel.

Realistically, most artists don't like being backstage at these sorts of events and minimize the actual amount of time they are on site (and in some cases, have very specific language and terms spelled out in their performer contracts) if they are able to.

Moby leaving immediately after his set or whatever it was he was doing sounds exactly like what would've happened, roaming gangs of backwards ballcap wearing hoodlums or no.
 
The closer of the final night were the Red Hot Chili Peppers, who for some goddamn reason distributed candles among the crowd for a "candlelight vigil" while they played Under the Bridge, in honor of gun crime victims. They used those candles to set a lot of shit on fire. You know what they say, the road to Hell is paved with good intentions.

Of course, since the Peppers are huge libs, I bet they won't be called out on this, or any of this will be even mentioned.
An hour and thirty in, they bring up the candles but claim an anti-gun group distributed the candles instead of Red Hot Chili Peppers.
 
I can't fucking believe the balls on these people.
People were angry at the $15 bottles of water and $12 slices of pizza, since the venue was literally the only place you could get food. Your friend passed out from dehydration and might die? Fuck you. The water is still $15.
EVERYTHING was priced this way at the venue. T-shirts were like $75 - $100.
EVERYONE was furious over this, not just the white males. These people spent like $350 for tickets only to get raped by insane prices all weekend long. You couldn't come up with a better recipe for disaster if you tried.

The promoters and organizers were responsible for the riots, end of story.
 
Haha Woodstock '99 getting the struggle session treatment. Who'd knew.
Guys, this docu is making me defend Fred Durst. WTF?
Limp Bizkit was untouchable back in '99 and despite the shitshow (which I've just happen to find out that they played a saturday evening, the fires started the next day on sunday evening), they put on one hell of a show either way.

And I'll die on this hill, Bruno.


EDIT: Moreover, they already "covered" the controversy even when it was pinned on them, back in the day as well.

1627264700042.png


1627264836672.png

The music video opens with a clip of Oregon State Correctional Institution. The video portrays the band in prison cells at the beginning, where they are soon taken and put on trial for Woodstock. They are found guilty, and the video shows them performing the last portion of the song from inside a metal container, as onlookers watch while milk pours into the container to drown the band. When the song ends, the milk drains from the container, and the band is nowhere to be seen.
 
Última edición:
This was a horrible documentary on what happened. It felt more like a VH1 "I Hate Woodstock 99" special without the bad jokes and c-list comedians. I have no idea how girls wanting to flash their tits at a concert is due to the popularity of FHM or Maxim Magazine at that time. Noodles from The Offspring looks like a troon and Jewel shows up trying to be relevant. There was a better documentary that aired on HBO way back in 2000. It showed the concertgoers fucked up on drugs rambling nonsense while being taken away to the hospital and didn't have a mustachioed black guy saying the fans were racist or a fat white girl saying how many white guys were at the event.
 
Última edición:
I remember MTV doing this revisionist woke shit back in the early 00s so it's not new. Thank god the West is poised to collapse soon or we'd have a generation of young people who only get their history from fake news like this.

I'm just under half way through and it's not really a documentary on the Woodstock 99 fiasco and more of a hit piece on that late 90's/early 00's era of culture.

I'm worried now that Jay from Red Letter Media recommended this and another woke documentary Horror Noire.
I can't even imagine what personal hell you must be going through to take recommendations from Gay Blows Men.
 
I remember MTV doing this revisionist woke shit back in the early 00s so it's not new. Thank god the West is poised to collapse soon or we'd have a generation of young people who only get their history from fake news like this.


I can't even imagine what personal hell you must be going through to take recommendations from Gay Blows Men.
This is the Tweet:


jay.PNG


I'm more confused than anything. Did he just start watching it and thought to recommend it? Does he agree with the woke perspective? Maybe he just personally really hates Limp Bizkit? I don't know.
 
This was a horrible documentary on what happened.
I actually want to find out who was involved in the production of this documentary. If any of the organizers were involved, they are trying to (again) rewrite the history of what happened.

I remember MTV doing this revisionist woke shit back in the early 00s so it's not new.
Woodstock '94 was such a massive success, they wanted to do a Woodstock every five years in perpetuity. The 00s documentary was them desperately trying to save the brand, because Woodstock '99 killed it. They fucked up HARD. They had a captive audience who they forced through inhumane conditions all weekend and abused with astronomical prices (knowing there was nowhere else for them to go to get what they needed). What the organizers did was sheer criminality.

I'm more confused than anything. Did he just start watching it and thought to recommend it? Does he agree with the woke perspective? Maybe he just personally really hates Limp Bizkit? I don't know.
Jay's not a woketard by any stretch of the imagination. Those guys are all in their late 30s/early 40s, so they're all old enough to remember Woodstock '99 when it happened. I'm wondering if the "horror" to which Jay is referring might be the shameless rewriting of history, and the fact that most people automatically believed it. Because that is scary as fuck.
 
Jay's not a woketard by any stretch of the imagination. Those guys are all in their late 30s/early 40s, so they're all old enough to remember Woodstock '99 when it happened. I'm wondering if the "horror" to which Jay is referring might be the shameless rewriting of history, and the fact that most people automatically believed it. Because that is scary as fuck.
I'm thinking either that or he just hates Limp Bizkit. Because it would be very out of character for him otherwise.
 
I can't fucking believe the balls on these people.
People were angry at the $15 bottles of water and $12 slices of pizza, since the venue was literally the only place you could get food. Your friend passed out from dehydration and might die? Fuck you. The water is still $15.
EVERYTHING was priced this way at the venue. T-shirts were like $75 - $100.
EVERYONE was furious over this, not just the white males. These people spent like $350 for tickets only to get raped by insane prices all weekend long. You couldn't come up with a better recipe for disaster if you tried.

The promoters and organizers were responsible for the riots, end of story.
Also the weekend was hot as fuck and the stages were a mile apart from one another. You had to walk there. No other transport. And the local town near by ran out of everything pretty quickly.
 
Also the weekend was hot as fuck and the stages were a mile apart from one another. You had to walk there. No other transport. And the local town near by ran out of everything pretty quickly.
I forgot about that. Yeah, that was bad.
The promoters should have faced charges for this clusterfuck. Also, they should have crafted laws that banned price gouging captive audiences (ie festivals, concerts, movie theaters, etc). A bottle of water at a rock concert should be the average price of a bottle of water at local convenience stores. Convenience stores mark up their shit by a lot already, there is no good reason to go any higher than that.
 
And the wokesters wonder WHY there's an increasing number of angry white males (the ones who don't puss out and get soyed up and join them anyways) and why the numbers are going up not down. When you keep insulting the majority population and putting out hit pieces like this to try and shame them for being who they are, they're gonna get pissed off and eventually push back.
 
I just told a friend of mine about this documentary, and he was all, "did they at least mention the porta-potties?"
Holy fuck. ANOTHER aspect that I had completely forgotten about.

They didn't have enough bathrooms for people and many of them got knocked over/destroyed on the first or second day. So people were pissing and shitting in random places all over the venue, and then other people would walk through it or fall down in it. That was another HUGE factor that led up to the meltdown.
People were walking around for three days covered in other people's piss and shit.

Was this even mentioned in the documentary? Who actually watched this bullshit?
 
I'm just under half way through and it's not really a documentary on the Woodstock 99 fiasco and more of a hit piece on that late 90's/early 00's era of culture.
It's hilarious to me how antithetical the culture of that era is to today's Woke, everything was the exact polar opposite back then than it is today, men were men, women were women and being a cock garbling faggot was not seen as cool, it was a much happier time.

It's almost as if Woke was essentially a movement to take a look at how things were and purposely do the exact opposite of however society and culture used to be.

The good news is it's entirely possible that in another 20 years the pendulum will swing again and things will be the polar opposite of today.
 
I actually want to find out who was involved in the production of this documentary. If any of the organizers were involved, they are trying to (again) rewrite the history of what happened.
They do speak with John Scher and one of the producers of the Angry Video Game Nerd movie worked on this film.
Was this even mentioned in the documentary? Who actually watched this bullshit?
The Port-a-Potties were in one segment, but they briefly mention it and the people being covered in mud and move on to talk about how people slept on pizza boxes.
 
Última edición:
Atrás
Top Abajo