Culture Barnes & Noble suspends reissues of classics with 'diverse' covers - Apparently new covers with different skin tones aren't a selling point for classics.


Barnes & Noble

Barnes & Noble is withdrawing its planned Diverse Editions line, which featured 12 classic texts repackaged with new 'diverse' covers. The initiative was met with widespread criticism. (TBWA/Chiat/Day New York/Barnes & Noble)

Barnes & Noble is withdrawing a planned line of famous literature reissued with multicultural cover images that has been met with widespread criticism on social media.

"We acknowledge the voices who have expressed concerns about the Diverse Editions project at our Barnes & Noble Fifth Avenue store and have decided to suspend the initiative," Barnes & Noble announced in a statement Wednesday.

The author Adriana Herrera had called the books, scheduled to be launched this week, "the classics in blackface."

"Diverse Editions," a joint project between Barnes & Noble and Penguin Random House, featured 12 texts, including Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and L. Frank Baum's The Wizard of Oz.

The text remains the same, but on the cover, major characters are depicted with dark-skinned illustrations by artists of "different ethnicities and backgrounds," according to Barnes & Noble.

"Absolute TONE-DEAF decision-making," Mexican-American writer David Bowles, a leading critic of American Dirt, tweeted about "Diverse Editions."

"Diverse Editions" was announced at a time when the publishing industry is already facing scrutiny over the novel American Dirt and its depiction of Mexican life and culture.

The decision also comes in February, which is Black History Month, an annual celebration of past and present achievement.

To much disbelief online, the organizers of "Diverse Editions" had said they used artificial intelligence in reviewing more than 100 older books and determining whether the race or ethnicity of a character is specifically stated. Few would argue that Alice from Alice in Wonderland or the title characters of Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are fitting for a tribute to black history.

"They could have Googled, chosen a dozen books by actual Black authors that are classics & sent those out with fresh covers & a big event," author MIkki Kendall tweeted.

"Add in bringing in contemporary Black authors to discuss these works & the whole thing is a win. They didn't do the easy or logical thing."


barnes-noble-books-withdrawn.jpg

'The covers are not a substitute for black voices or writers of colour, whose work and voices deserve to be heard,' Barnes & Noble acknowledged in a statement. (Gene J. Puskar/Associated Press)

In its statement Wednesday, Barnes & Noble acknowledged that the new covers were "not a substitute for black voices or writers of colour, whose work and voices deserve to be heard.

"The booksellers who championed this initiative did so convinced it would help drive engagement with these classic titles," according to the bookstore chain.

"It was a project inspired by our work with schools and was created in part to raise awareness and discussion during Black History Month, in which Barnes & Noble stores nationally will continue to highlight a wide selection of books to celebrate black history and great literature from writers of colour."

- - -

Looks like "diversity for diversity's sake" doesn't help sell books. Color me surprised.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Those of us who post in the YA thread here (yes, we have that) know how INSANE these young readers audience is. They're absolutely out of their minds with their stupid diversity dogmas. Nothing is enough for them. If a character is black, then it's not woman. If it's a black woman, then it's not gay. If she's a gay black woman, then still not a muslim or some shit. They are more virulent than the fucking Coronavirus. Go and take a look. You think HP fans are bad? Yeah, be prepared to face horror.

With that being said, this stupid idea only confirms what many actual racist people say about how black people have no culture that they have to "steal" white people's. They could promote actual books written by authors from all over the world, from different backgrounds, ethnicity, religion, ages, genders... but no. MAKE THE WHITEYS BLACK because it's lazy to make people buy the same shit they've been reading for almost centuries except this time it has a new fucking hat.

And of course, we all know niggas don't read.

What are you talking about? Who is saying that blacks steal culture? I have had more than one shitty half-breed tell me that white people have no culture.
 
We may have glossed over the real issue.

"They could have Googled, chosen a dozen books by actual Black authors that are classics & sent those out with fresh covers & a big event," author MIkki Kendall tweeted.

"Add in bringing in contemporary Black authors to discuss these works & the whole thing is a win. They didn't do the easy or logical thing."

Diversity and "Blackification" is all fun and games until Black authors aren't the ones making money off of it, then it's a step too far.
 
I’m just looking at that Frankenstein cover and I can’t stop thinking about Blackenstein.
Ver archivo adjunto 1132878

Are we just circling back around to Blaxploitation? Because I don’t know how to feel about that.

For anyone who hasn't seen it, Blackenstein only kills white people. Including a dog who had the unfortunate luck to be born with white fur.

"The Man" corners him in an abandoned building and sics dogs on him.

Just novelize Blackenstein, call it Wokenstein or Decolinizationstein or whatever and sell that instead.

But seriously, this was a brandead promotion from the start. Somebody probably remembered that "Hermione can be black" and just ran with it, creating this monstrosity.

Never mind that many of these books take place in time periods where, if the characters were black, they would be treated a lot differently.

I'm glad that even POCs said this was stupid. They should have promototed books by black authors instead.
 
What should we do for black history month, fellas? Promote books by black people &/or about black characters, or recolor some Whiteys, thus implying there are no books with black characters worthy of being mentioned?

The Wizard of Oz cover is particularly cringey and stereotypical with the Air Jordans, it's like a meme someone would make to poke fun at this thing.
 
I think this would have gone down a lot better as series of posters. With those it's easy to say that they are just alternate universe sort of deal so they aren't really about the books and whatever baggage they may or may not have. People like small scale what ifs like that pretty well and if they get positive reaction bring the books with those covers afterwards because of "public demand".
 
So Frankenstein's monster couldn't speak and acted uneducated because he was black, not because he was a form of life just brought in to this world. It make so much more sense now.
That's the movie monster. The monster in the book is actually quite intelligent. He also spoke quite eloquently.

Universal changed a lot when adapting classic horror novels to film in the 30's.

Would be easier to simply promote books by black authors. Certainly would be cheaper than hiring artists to make new cover art. It'd also put money into the pockets of living authors.

They could use the fact that Cyberpunk 2020's creator is black to promote the RPG. Piggyback off the hype for 2077 a bit.
 
These book covers are meant to be displayed in public libraries run by the order of woke librarians, not to be sold in a store. I hate it. They could have done this for books by black authors. Color Me Dark, ect.
 
Also According to the parent company called Elliott Management Corporation (which is one of the world's largest activist hedge funds) the net income for Barnes and Noble is US$ - 3.769 million (FY 2019)
 
What should we do for black history month, fellas? Promote books by black people &/or about black characters, or recolor some Whiteys, thus implying there are no books with black characters worthy of being mentioned?

The Wizard of Oz cover is particularly cringey and stereotypical with the Air Jordans, it's like a meme someone would make to poke fun at this thing.
You know the irony is besides the blatantly racist stereotype of a black Dorothy that's trying to come off as woke is...... There is literally an all black version of The Wizard of Oz that everyone already knows, that's also a book. Whole thing is just bizarre.

71Mj516oP8L._SL1200_.jpg
 
And we need this why? Barnes and Nobel could have reissued classics written by black authors but I guess pretending Romeo and Juliet were Muslim lesbians is easier. Wokeness is so fascinating as it deosnt even really care about "diversity" or "equality" just the illusion of those things so inevitably white liberals who define those terms stay at the top
 
I think the reason that this crap existed in the first place was just low effort money, they could upsell old free public domain works that they already had queued up to print. The only cost was the shitty cover art that they obviously scrimped out on.

Promoting modern literature would probably earn them less.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo