Culture Barnes & Noble suspends reissues of classics with 'diverse' covers - Apparently new covers with different skin tones aren't a selling point for classics.


Barnes & Noble

Barnes & Noble is withdrawing its planned Diverse Editions line, which featured 12 classic texts repackaged with new 'diverse' covers. The initiative was met with widespread criticism. (TBWA/Chiat/Day New York/Barnes & Noble)

Barnes & Noble is withdrawing a planned line of famous literature reissued with multicultural cover images that has been met with widespread criticism on social media.

"We acknowledge the voices who have expressed concerns about the Diverse Editions project at our Barnes & Noble Fifth Avenue store and have decided to suspend the initiative," Barnes & Noble announced in a statement Wednesday.

The author Adriana Herrera had called the books, scheduled to be launched this week, "the classics in blackface."

"Diverse Editions," a joint project between Barnes & Noble and Penguin Random House, featured 12 texts, including Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and L. Frank Baum's The Wizard of Oz.

The text remains the same, but on the cover, major characters are depicted with dark-skinned illustrations by artists of "different ethnicities and backgrounds," according to Barnes & Noble.

"Absolute TONE-DEAF decision-making," Mexican-American writer David Bowles, a leading critic of American Dirt, tweeted about "Diverse Editions."

"Diverse Editions" was announced at a time when the publishing industry is already facing scrutiny over the novel American Dirt and its depiction of Mexican life and culture.

The decision also comes in February, which is Black History Month, an annual celebration of past and present achievement.

To much disbelief online, the organizers of "Diverse Editions" had said they used artificial intelligence in reviewing more than 100 older books and determining whether the race or ethnicity of a character is specifically stated. Few would argue that Alice from Alice in Wonderland or the title characters of Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are fitting for a tribute to black history.

"They could have Googled, chosen a dozen books by actual Black authors that are classics & sent those out with fresh covers & a big event," author MIkki Kendall tweeted.

"Add in bringing in contemporary Black authors to discuss these works & the whole thing is a win. They didn't do the easy or logical thing."


barnes-noble-books-withdrawn.jpg

'The covers are not a substitute for black voices or writers of colour, whose work and voices deserve to be heard,' Barnes & Noble acknowledged in a statement. (Gene J. Puskar/Associated Press)

In its statement Wednesday, Barnes & Noble acknowledged that the new covers were "not a substitute for black voices or writers of colour, whose work and voices deserve to be heard.

"The booksellers who championed this initiative did so convinced it would help drive engagement with these classic titles," according to the bookstore chain.

"It was a project inspired by our work with schools and was created in part to raise awareness and discussion during Black History Month, in which Barnes & Noble stores nationally will continue to highlight a wide selection of books to celebrate black history and great literature from writers of colour."

- - -

Looks like "diversity for diversity's sake" doesn't help sell books. Color me surprised.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Say it’s not so! This is very triggering to me. #CancelBarnes. They’ll never see me loiter around reading books while buying nothing ever again!
 
Última edición:
It's almost like it was cultural appropriation and a 1984-tier attempt at seeing if blatant historical revisionism will slide. How about you make Shaka-zulu into a white guy for fairness too, wonder what would happen to your company. Fucking slimebags.
Whites always been the most diverse..jpg
 
This seems like a dumb move no matter how you look at it. Making the cover art of Alice in Wonderland black isn’t going to get blacks interested, it’s not a reimagining or anything like the Wiz is compared to the Wizard of Oz.

Whatever marketing idiot came up with this is going to lose his job.
 
I'm more surprised Barnes and Noble is still in business at this point, I remember them shutting down most stores a few years ago. If this is the best they can come up with, I'm betting the rest of their stores will be closing soon.
 
I'm sure the artists who drew the covers are now super happy their work went to the trash because someone said it wasn't diverse enough.
 
You’d think an industry teetering on the verge of collapse would know better than to go woke, go broke. Those covers look like the books that are on sale all year round and got published only to meet diversity quotas.
 
It was doomed to fail anyway. The people behind this bs are so disassociated with real people that they seriously expected a bunch of hoodrats would see a blackface cover of Wuthering Heights and be like 'This shit is tight, nigga. I can't wait to read a novel about mental illness and cruelty set in the Victorian era'
 
You’d think an industry teetering on the verge of collapse would know better than to go woke, go broke. Those covers look like the books that are on sale all year round and got published only to meet diversity quotas.

The publishing industry has been woke for decades. The only speculative fiction house that won't blacklist you for being non-woke, for example, is Baen.
 
Gotta love the lack of self-awareness of people who think that certain people won't read a story unless the main character is the same color as them or is non-white.

By trying to come off as non-racist, they're actually being very racist.
 
This is “cop pulls over a black motorist who’s done nothing wrong so he can film himself giving them ice cream” levels of tonedeaf virtue-signaling.
 
What is the logic of making Frankenstein's Monster black? He's a stitched together monstrosity of a bunch of different dead people. I guess having decayed green skin isn't culturally inclusive? Tone deaf to the extreme. How about just market books that have black protagonists?
 
The publishing industry has been woke for decades. The only speculative fiction house that won't blacklist you for being non-woke, for example, is Baen.
It is and it isn’t, look at American Dirt. A million dollar book deal that has all of the pissed because a white woman wrote a poorly yet compelling book about illegal migration.

The PR campaign around it was masterful, it hit Oprah’s book club and none of the buzzfeed and vice or Vox hit pieces could tear it down. Even Salma Hayek tweeted her love for the book. The insignificant SJW, couldn’t cancel it.
 
To much disbelief online, the organizers of "Diverse Editions" had said they used artificial intelligence in reviewing more than 100 older books and determining whether the race or ethnicity of a character is specifically stated.
I call fucking bullshit. A system that can "read" entire books to the point it can answer a pinpoint question is something that will revolutionize the entire Machine Learning field rather than be used by a broke book seller. It's infinitely more likely they looked where the word "white/fair" is and seen what character it refers to (regardless of character's nationality, language and situation).
 
Atrás
Top Abajo