Culture Barnes & Noble suspends reissues of classics with 'diverse' covers - Apparently new covers with different skin tones aren't a selling point for classics.


Barnes & Noble

Barnes & Noble is withdrawing its planned Diverse Editions line, which featured 12 classic texts repackaged with new 'diverse' covers. The initiative was met with widespread criticism. (TBWA/Chiat/Day New York/Barnes & Noble)

Barnes & Noble is withdrawing a planned line of famous literature reissued with multicultural cover images that has been met with widespread criticism on social media.

"We acknowledge the voices who have expressed concerns about the Diverse Editions project at our Barnes & Noble Fifth Avenue store and have decided to suspend the initiative," Barnes & Noble announced in a statement Wednesday.

The author Adriana Herrera had called the books, scheduled to be launched this week, "the classics in blackface."

"Diverse Editions," a joint project between Barnes & Noble and Penguin Random House, featured 12 texts, including Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and L. Frank Baum's The Wizard of Oz.

The text remains the same, but on the cover, major characters are depicted with dark-skinned illustrations by artists of "different ethnicities and backgrounds," according to Barnes & Noble.

"Absolute TONE-DEAF decision-making," Mexican-American writer David Bowles, a leading critic of American Dirt, tweeted about "Diverse Editions."

"Diverse Editions" was announced at a time when the publishing industry is already facing scrutiny over the novel American Dirt and its depiction of Mexican life and culture.

The decision also comes in February, which is Black History Month, an annual celebration of past and present achievement.

To much disbelief online, the organizers of "Diverse Editions" had said they used artificial intelligence in reviewing more than 100 older books and determining whether the race or ethnicity of a character is specifically stated. Few would argue that Alice from Alice in Wonderland or the title characters of Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are fitting for a tribute to black history.

"They could have Googled, chosen a dozen books by actual Black authors that are classics & sent those out with fresh covers & a big event," author MIkki Kendall tweeted.

"Add in bringing in contemporary Black authors to discuss these works & the whole thing is a win. They didn't do the easy or logical thing."


barnes-noble-books-withdrawn.jpg

'The covers are not a substitute for black voices or writers of colour, whose work and voices deserve to be heard,' Barnes & Noble acknowledged in a statement. (Gene J. Puskar/Associated Press)

In its statement Wednesday, Barnes & Noble acknowledged that the new covers were "not a substitute for black voices or writers of colour, whose work and voices deserve to be heard.

"The booksellers who championed this initiative did so convinced it would help drive engagement with these classic titles," according to the bookstore chain.

"It was a project inspired by our work with schools and was created in part to raise awareness and discussion during Black History Month, in which Barnes & Noble stores nationally will continue to highlight a wide selection of books to celebrate black history and great literature from writers of colour."

- - -

Looks like "diversity for diversity's sake" doesn't help sell books. Color me surprised.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
"To much disbelief online, the organizers of "Diverse Editions" had said they used artificial intelligence in reviewing more than 100 older books and determining whether the race or ethnicity of a character is specifically stated."

Wait. You mean they "used artificial intelligence" instead of, say, _reading_ the books they were thinking about publishing?
Ironically, I seem to remember Frankenstein being described as having unnaturally pale skin and a very uncanny pretty face. Gonna be kinda weird if they go on about blackenstein being a pale pretty boy instead of a a big dark undead thug nigga.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 1133101

Holy fuck, they gave Dorothy a pair of ruby Air Jordans

This is so fucking amazing.
They missed an opportunity not having Toto as a neglected rottweiler/pitbull mutt though

Why isn't she wearing the fucking shoes though? Is Demikathy just walking around Oz barefoot?

Like, "Well, we gotta show the shoes or else no one is going to get it. Maybe make 'em Jordans just to be sure."

Is that how little this artist thinks of their own art? Or is that just what they think of their audience?
 
Ver archivo adjunto 1133101

Holy fuck, they gave Dorothy a pair of ruby Air Jordans

This is so fucking amazing.
They missed an opportunity not having Toto as a neglected rottweiler/pitbull mutt though
Dor-Athee stealing a pair of red Jordans from a dead bitch is spot-on

What a waste of money. B&N's hardbound collectors' editions used to be pretty fucking good.
 
Since black writers in the public domain has been brought up, Project Gutenberg has a list...

Pretty slim pickings, tho it's only a list of American writers. Better to just throw one of those rasta-hat-and-dreadlock wigs on Alice in Wonderland and call it a day.

(And Moby Dick already has a diverse character in the ostensibly homosexual south Pacific Islander Queequeg, why'd they have to make Captain Ahab black?)
 
So is this only on the covers or are the books changed to have black characters too?
My impression is that it's just the cover, and they haven't changed a word. Their excuse is 'these characters never have their race explicitly stated in the book', but that's based on their claims of AI (which is bullshit) and ignoring such things as the lack of necessity in identifying a lead character's skin colour when they book is set, say, in Regency England within the middle class, like Emma.

And has also been pointed out, just because they say the race hasn't been explicitly stated in the book doesn't mean that's true. Hell, even the example they like to cite of Hermione from Harry Potter actually has a line that specifically says she's white, they just would rather ignore it because of course they do.

This was clearly a very stupid idea that was guaranteed to make nobody happy, and it has rightfully completely blown up in their faces. There's a couple of wokenstein employees whose racist asses should hopefully be unemployed about now.
 
You're absolutely right. Corporations like B&N are all over anything that gives them the appearance of being woke only so long as it costs them nothing. They want to look like they're supporting black authors but this doesn't extend to doing anything that might lead to those authors or their estates getting any kind of pay.

It's got to be especially important for a corporation that exists to sell a medium that is being wiped out by tablets and smartphones. Imagine how stingey Blockbuster video would be about supporting black filmmakers if they were still a big company today.
Oh my god I've never been happier to remember that Blockbuster is out of business than now. Can you imagine a woke Blockbuster??? Live long enough to become a villain indeed.
 
"Aww shit nigga, time to read some Wizard o' Oz down in da shizznit!"
"What da fuck? On da fron' it a shawty I'd tap, but in the book, it a cracka-ass ho! I'll rob this store next time!"
 
Why isn't she wearing the fucking shoes though? Is Demikathy just walking around Oz barefoot?

Like, "Well, we gotta show the shoes or else no one is going to get it. Maybe make 'em Jordans just to be sure."

Is that how little this artist thinks of their own art? Or is that just what they think of their audience?
they didn't even read the books.
This is how little they think of black people. It's all just lazy marketing to them.

You have to understand that entrenched attitudes of racism do exist in America that hurt black people's ability to prosper and receive dignity and respect. And those entrenched attitudes are mostly on the part of wokie virtue signalers. Blacks are not even people to them, they are tools for the advancement of their own social status amongst each other.
 
The problem with that is there aren’t that many black authors with works in public domain. To my mind the blackest classical author I can think of is Pushkin. I’m not too knowledgeable about literature so maybe there are others, but even still the pickings have to be real slim.
I find it absolutely fascinating that people call Pushkin black, when he was an octoroon with more Russian blood than the god damn tsar. Also, Pushlin didnt really write novels, he was a poet.
A better example would be Alexandre Dumas (quadroon), and it would be kinda hilarious if they remade the three musketeers to portray d'artagnan as a street thug or some such.
 
ftfy
and what does that have to do with the fanny pack?
Fanny packs are part of intentionally hideous hipster culture, along with man buns and birth control glasses. Since rich hipsters are self-centered idiots, they assume everybody has the same "cool" taste as some middle aged trust fund bitch in Brookyln.
they didn't even read the books.
Ver archivo adjunto 1134863
>upload your own
Is that still functional?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo