Culture Barnes & Noble suspends reissues of classics with 'diverse' covers - Apparently new covers with different skin tones aren't a selling point for classics.


Barnes & Noble

Barnes & Noble is withdrawing its planned Diverse Editions line, which featured 12 classic texts repackaged with new 'diverse' covers. The initiative was met with widespread criticism. (TBWA/Chiat/Day New York/Barnes & Noble)

Barnes & Noble is withdrawing a planned line of famous literature reissued with multicultural cover images that has been met with widespread criticism on social media.

"We acknowledge the voices who have expressed concerns about the Diverse Editions project at our Barnes & Noble Fifth Avenue store and have decided to suspend the initiative," Barnes & Noble announced in a statement Wednesday.

The author Adriana Herrera had called the books, scheduled to be launched this week, "the classics in blackface."

"Diverse Editions," a joint project between Barnes & Noble and Penguin Random House, featured 12 texts, including Lewis Carroll's Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and L. Frank Baum's The Wizard of Oz.

The text remains the same, but on the cover, major characters are depicted with dark-skinned illustrations by artists of "different ethnicities and backgrounds," according to Barnes & Noble.

"Absolute TONE-DEAF decision-making," Mexican-American writer David Bowles, a leading critic of American Dirt, tweeted about "Diverse Editions."

"Diverse Editions" was announced at a time when the publishing industry is already facing scrutiny over the novel American Dirt and its depiction of Mexican life and culture.

The decision also comes in February, which is Black History Month, an annual celebration of past and present achievement.

To much disbelief online, the organizers of "Diverse Editions" had said they used artificial intelligence in reviewing more than 100 older books and determining whether the race or ethnicity of a character is specifically stated. Few would argue that Alice from Alice in Wonderland or the title characters of Strange Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde are fitting for a tribute to black history.

"They could have Googled, chosen a dozen books by actual Black authors that are classics & sent those out with fresh covers & a big event," author MIkki Kendall tweeted.

"Add in bringing in contemporary Black authors to discuss these works & the whole thing is a win. They didn't do the easy or logical thing."


barnes-noble-books-withdrawn.jpg

'The covers are not a substitute for black voices or writers of colour, whose work and voices deserve to be heard,' Barnes & Noble acknowledged in a statement. (Gene J. Puskar/Associated Press)

In its statement Wednesday, Barnes & Noble acknowledged that the new covers were "not a substitute for black voices or writers of colour, whose work and voices deserve to be heard.

"The booksellers who championed this initiative did so convinced it would help drive engagement with these classic titles," according to the bookstore chain.

"It was a project inspired by our work with schools and was created in part to raise awareness and discussion during Black History Month, in which Barnes & Noble stores nationally will continue to highlight a wide selection of books to celebrate black history and great literature from writers of colour."

- - -

Looks like "diversity for diversity's sake" doesn't help sell books. Color me surprised.
 
Última edición por un moderador:
What is the logic of making Frankenstein's Monster black? He's a stitched together monstrosity of a bunch of different dead people. I guess having decayed green skin isn't culturally inclusive? Tone deaf to the extreme. How about just market books that have black protagonists?
Oh but don't you know? People who aren't white males are too oppressed and don't have enough privilege to have their own stories, so the only way they can be equal is to be placed in reboots and remakes of classic films and literature where the characters have different skin colors.

Because that's how reality works.
 
This seems like a dumb move no matter how you look at it. Making the cover art of Alice in Wonderland black isn’t going to get blacks interested, it’s not a reimagining or anything like the Wiz is compared to the Wizard of Oz.
If you want to get blacks to read Alice in Wonderland, put the caterpillar smoking the hookah on the cover:
1581003425250.png

I have rarely seen a black male between the ages of 10 and 100 hang out at Barnes and noble, let along a full pack of hood niggas.
Men, no. Women, you can find swarming the urban fiction for titles like these:
1581003601430.png 1581003641175.png 1581003671896.png
The entire aisle usually has magnetic anti-theft stickers tucked into every cover as well, you can guess why.
 
Those covers look like the books that are on sale all year round and got published only to meet diversity quotas.
That's exactly what they are. A bunch of public domain books with a different covers slapped on them so they had something to put on the display for February. After the month is over they'll get thrown in the bargain bin.
 
That's exactly what they are. A bunch of public domain books with a different covers slapped on them so they had something to put on the display for February. After the month is over they'll get thrown in the bargain bin.
Why even bother?black people cant read anyway...

Its highly disturbing that its not just fiction, Romeo and Juliet is based on real events...
 
Heh,

"In fair Verona now our tale begins
Where niggas ain't shit and they like chicken
Did Juliet and Romeo hook up
And start the turf war with the word 'whussup?'"
 
> "Diverse Editions" was announced at a time when the publishing industry is already facing scrutiny over the novel American Dirt and its depiction of Mexican life and culture.

The whole PUBLISHING INDUSTRY is reeling from one book! 2 million registered ISBNs!

I call fucking bullshit. A system that can "read" entire books to the point it can answer a pinpoint question is something that will revolutionize the entire Machine Learning field rather than be used by a broke book seller. It's infinitely more likely they looked where the word "white/fair" is and seen what character it refers to (regardless of character's nationality, language and situation).
Yeah this. To use machine learning, they'd need a training set: many more books from the same period (because language drifts) already labeled by race. If such a set existed, it definitely would've already included the "classics" they intended to publish.
 
I'm noticing duplicates in which one's with a black character, the other is white. What were they trying to prove with that, to see which "version" sold more copies than the other to prove racism exists even though they had to have been drawn by the same artist?
 
I'm noticing duplicates in which one's with a black character, the other is white. What were they trying to prove with that, to see which "version" sold more copies than the other to prove racism exists even though they had to have been drawn by the same artist?
They all look so cheap.
Thats why i started buying used books or high end books a long time ago.
Yes Folio Society and co are expensive, but their books are just so nice.
 
So is this only on the covers or are the books changed to have black characters too?

From the sounds of the original article, I think they were pulling a Hermione Granger and "well it was never explicitly stated that the character was white"... Because, you know, 19th century European authors definitely would have mentioned that their characters resembled majority of people found in the story's setting. And it's not like they would have had to approve any illustrations that might have gone into early versions of the book or anything.

Anyway, this one quote really stood out to me from the article:
"They could have Googled, chosen a dozen books by actual Black authors that are classics & sent those out with fresh covers & a big event," author MIkki Kendall tweeted.

That's pretty much the best summary of present day pop culture that I've ever seen. Gee, should we take some quality content that most people probably haven't heard of and introduce them to it? Pft, no, let's just take the same old stuff everyone already knows back to front and retool it slightly and pretend we've done something remarkable. Nobody ever gets tired of that shit.
 
Última edición:
I'm all for tricking the woke crowd into reading classics, but I think its going to take more than shitty tumblr art to do that.
 
Those of us who post in the YA thread here (yes, we have that) know how INSANE these young readers audience is. They're absolutely out of their minds with their stupid diversity dogmas. Nothing is enough for them. If a character is black, then it's not woman. If it's a black woman, then it's not gay. If she's a gay black woman, then still not a muslim or some shit. They are more virulent than the fucking Coronavirus. Go and take a look. You think HP fans are bad? Yeah, be prepared to face horror.

With that being said, this stupid idea only confirms what many actual racist people say about how black people have no culture that they have to "steal" white people's. They could promote actual books written by authors from all over the world, from different backgrounds, ethnicity, religion, ages, genders... but no. MAKE THE WHITEYS BLACK because it's lazy to make people buy the same shit they've been reading for almost centuries except this time it has a new fucking hat.

And of course, we all know niggas don't read.
 
AYYYY OHH WE WUZ FRANKENSTEIN N SHEIT

What better way to celebrate black history month than by depicting blacks as stealing some shit that was already made by white people.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo