UN Tasmanian tiger declared extinct 80 years ago ‘spotted’ eight times

Eight reported sightings of a creature believed to be extinct are forcing experts to wonder whether it could still be alive.

The Tasmanian tiger, a large striped marsupial carnivore with almost Loch Ness Monster status Down Under, was thought to have died out in 1936, when the last one known died in captivity.

But newly released Australian government documents show sightings have been reported as recently as two months ago.

The species, officially called a thylacine, resembled a cross between a large cat, a fox and a wolf. It had yellowish brown fur, powerful jaws and a pouch for its young like a kangaroo.

Among eight sightings in the past three years was one from a couple from Western Australia visiting the island of Tasmania in February, who said they saw one of the creatures crossing the road.
The animal “turned and looked at the vehicle a couple of times” and “was in clear view for 12-15 seconds,” the report read. Both people in the car “are 100 per cent certain that the animal they saw was a thylacine.”


It had stripes down its back, the report read.

Another report the same month described a striped “cat-like creature” moving through the mist in the distance, CNN reported.

“I am accustomed to coming across most animals working on rural farms ... and I have never come across an animal anything close to what I saw in Tasmania that day,” the witness said.

In 2017, another driver reported seeing a possible thylacine near in northwestern Tasmania. He “seemed certain that if it was a cat it was a bloody big one,” the report said.

Most recently, in July, a man in southern Tasmania, near the state capital of Hobart, reported seeing a footprint that seemed to match that of the Tasmanian tiger.

Native to both Tasmania and the Australian mainland, it was the only member of the Thylacinidae family to survive into modern times, according to the Australian Museum.

European colonists in the 19th century killed thousands of thylacines for attacking sheep.

What was thought to be the last one of its kind died in Hobart Zoo in 1936, although there have been regular claims of unsubstantiated sightings, giving the animal an almost mythical status in Tasmanian culture.

Tasmania’s Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment released the document detailing the eight reported sightings.

In 2002, scientists at the Australian Museum replicated thylacine DNA, opening the door to potentially reviving the species with cloning technology.

 
As much as I would love this to be true, the utter lack of bodies/tracks/shit or indeed any measurable impact on local wildlife that a breeding population of Tasmanian Tigers would have makes me 100% certain this wont pan out.

Hell the whole "environmental DNA" thing they rolled out a while ago means that the chances of any cryptid or sekrit survivor animal remaining undetected in future have been reduced to effectively zero, even in remote as shit areas, as it is now possible to just collect a couple dozen soil/water samples from around the region and process it to detect the tiniest fragments of dna from literally any animal that exists nearby given how often cells get blown around an animal's local environment by day to day respiration and excretion.
 
Remind me again. Why don’t we clone animals like this?
A general lack of interest would be my best guess.

Anyways, this is one extinct animal I could actually believe still exists. I don't have much hope for that being the case, but I do think it could be entirely possible.
 
Última edición:
Remind me again. Why don’t we clone animals like this?
Do we even have the full ability yet? Besides the gestation problem, we'll also have to figure out how to keep the animals from suffering from crippling inbreeding.

It would be fascinating to test how much of the animal kingdom is nature vs nurture though...
 
As much as I would love this to be true, the utter lack of bodies/tracks/shit or indeed any measurable impact on local wildlife that a breeding population of Tasmanian Tigers would have makes me 100% certain this wont pan out.

Hell the whole "environmental DNA" thing they rolled out a while ago means that the chances of any cryptid or sekrit survivor animal remaining undetected in future have been reduced to effectively zero, even in remote as shit areas, as it is now possible to just collect a couple dozen soil/water samples from around the region and process it to detect the tiniest fragments of dna from literally any animal that exists nearby given how often cells get blown around an animal's local environment by day to day respiration and excretion.
While cool, that's pretty depressing and takes the mystery out of these things :(

But don't they regularly find animals that scientists thought were extinct, while locals knew well were still around?

Still, my guess is that someone had a big cat as a pet and it got loose. Or they just freed it figuring it can't make Australia any worse than it already is.
 
Unironically Jurassic Park. People are stupid and think entertainment has moral stories that they should buy into.

They actually mentioned cloning animals who got extinct due to human intervention and said it was not the same case. It's during their lunch meeting at the beginning. The difference would be that dinosaurs aren't made to live along humans because we're separated by millions of years. Other animals can survive along humans and viceversa.
 
A general lack of interest would be my best guess.
Yeah probably. I think it's cool and wish we would preserve at least maybe animal DNA, but no government body is going to fund it and neither will any random private institution unless it was a passion thing.

That said, individual animals of an extinct species are probably pretty common, they just live in complete isolation. They survive by being isolated, in a way because again, there is no proof of them and as an individual they dont leave any signs of an animal colony or group, people come across some random pawprint and dont think anything of it.

I think the last Black or White Rhino died a few years back.
 
Última edición:
Every few years there's a press beat up about how thylacines may not be extinct. This one has no more credibility than the others.

While we do quite regularly discover small species previously thought to be extinct, we're talking about a 30kg carnivorous predator here. If they existed in sufficient numbers to ensure the continued survival of the species over the last 80 years, we should have found some kind of evidence - whether it's poop or bones.
 
I don't blame scientists for not wanting to stay in Tasmania long enough to track it down for confirmation, but as cool as it would be to hear there's a surviving breeding population currently suffering from population bottleneck, 80 years and sparse unverified reports make it difficult to believe it has survived. But nature has ways of trolling us, so I'll give it another 50 years. If nothing more comes out of it, the thylacine is as dead as the great auk, dead as the dodo, dead as the passenger pigeon.
 
They actually mentioned cloning animals who got extinct due to human intervention and said it was not the same case. It's during their lunch meeting at the beginning. The difference would be that dinosaurs aren't made to live along humans because we're separated by millions of years. Other animals can survive along humans and viceversa.
Why not clone something easy like a passenger pigeon?
 
Atrás
Top Abajo