- Registrado
- 31 de Mayo, 2019
Very emotional, I just wonder, is there a public source about radiation sickness and radioactive burns on the skin, cause I would like to know how realistic that depiction was. In terms of -say- Akimov and that Firefighter Wassili (the one who irradiates his wife), I assume it was pretty spot on, but the other firefighter that lifts a piece of graphite at the beginning might be a bit exaggerated. Then again, he was touching a piece of graphite just a few minutes after it was thrown out of the reactor, so god knows how many short-lived isotopes you'd still have on that, emitting insane levels of radiation.
The effects of radiation were exaggerated for the show. Not that the real life people the actors were portraying DIDN'T get horrific burns , it's just that those took about 1 to a few days to show up. (The firefighter who touched the graphite initally reported only numbness, but his condition certainly deteriorated as time went on. The people on the Bridge of Death did receive mild radiation burns, and many died later of cancer and leukemia, but as far as we know, they weren't thronging into the hospital with severe pain as they were portrayed as doing in the show. )
The reason the showrunners did this was as a shorthand way to show the audience how screwed the radiation poisoned people were. The real life plant workers themselves would have been able to see the real life subtle signs of early radiation poisoning and would have known their fates, but it's a hard thing to convey to an audience unversed in that kind of thing. Having a poisoned character's face turn red immediately after looking at the burning core lets us know how serious things are for them.
Also, the Red Forest around Chernobyl didn't turn red immediately. That took several weeks to occur. Radiation itself is invisible and hard to detect so the filmmakers had to take some liberties in portraying its effects. So that we'd get the message: this shit does bad things.