US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[CaliforniaRaisin]

In other news.. mamdani announces the long awaited city run grocery stores.
1000039899.mp4

Can't wait to watch videos of the niggers descending on these stores, gang-running a shoplifting spree while trashing the place and then bragging about it online while doing that gay ass finger gun trigger thing like they just pulled a bank heist. I give it less than a year before these stores are mostly empty from lack of funds and goods because any time they're stocked, Da'Quan and his butt pirates show up and empty it out for TikTok views.

Mamdani just doxed everyone in NYC with a property worth 1m or more

Am I crazy, or is 1m just over the median value of housing in NYC anyways? Like... having a million dollar property in NYC isn't a fucking luxury. It's barely above average.

 

[The Ugly One]

I don't know why anyone thinks the Democrat establishment is going to roll over and give the DSA the reigns.

Because they're in their 80s and destroyed anyone who could replace them.

This nigger just published a fucking hit list, and a poorly-vetted one at that. Some of the people on that list are going to fucking die as a DIRECT result of this list and he's not going to care.

We REALLY need to bring back lynching.

Mamdami won the majority of voters between $50k and $199k, and 34% of voters over $200k. A lot of people getting hit voted for him. Their other chosen son was a corrupt retard who put sick people in old folks' homes and killed them as a power move. They had earlier put a woke moron in charge of the city who stopped prosecuting black people for crimes, and reelected him to boot. This is why I just can't feel sorry for New Yorkers.

 

[Nice Stick]

That Israeli setter sure gets around. Lying to Americans, so easy a caveman can do it.

 

[Iron Jaguar]

 

[WiggerNationalist]

That Israeli setter sure gets around. Lying to Americans, so easy a caveman can do it.

Ver archivo adjunto 9334836

Why he look like that

 

[Betonhaus]

@Null you should have your AI shit scan pictures to create html embedded alt text so users can search things and avoid late posting.

In this case Betonhaus could have searched "horrifying gummy crackhead jewish abomination" and realized that the same twitter screenshot was already posted earlier.

Did you really not notice the gradual edits in the photos?

 

[RetardMaxxer]

Bitch sounds like she just popped a Valium.

I wouldn't blame her for doing that.

 

[quaawaa]

30% of glowies just got laid off:

Source (Archive)

 

[Betonhaus]

30% of glowies just got laid off:
Ver archivo adjunto 9334960
Source (Archive)

Hopefully it was mostly the cunts who hate America

 

[Useful_Mistake]

10th Circuit decided a landmark case on quantum rape. If you, as a landlord, hire a mexican for maintenance work who has a transgender child, and that mexican eventually rapes a woman, have you as a landlord through transitive properties also raped the woman? The 10th Circuit holds that the answer is no, however the result might have been different if the woman had locked her door instead of leaving it unlocked.

https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010111477282.pdf

 

[CharlesBarkley]

quantum rape

Isn’t quantum rape when a dude stocks his weiner in a time portal and rapes someone else’s butthole in a different dimension? I think one time that The Hulk did that to himself to induce himself into a post-rape rage to kill Iron Man.

 

[XYZpdq Jr.]

Isn’t quantum rape when a dude stocks his weiner in a time portal and rapes someone else’s butthole in a different dimension? I think one time that The Hulk did that to himself to induce himself into a post-rape rage to kill Iron Man.

Hulk getting butt raped at the Y is classic 616 canon

 

[Jace on ice]

I mean, the o in disorderly is closed and the first o in conduct is a bit open but... Holy shit, people have handwriting and it's not 100% perfect and has different styles. If you're going to clown on someone, clown on them without being disingenuous. Maybe not the "lol her handwriting isn't literally perfect" and maybe more on the "Hey, this stupid bitch just blatantly violated the first amendment."

"Disorderly Conduct" shouldn't even be a thing. It's a catch all charge that can fit literally any situation and is incredibly abusable.

If someone hits someone charge them with assault, if they break something charge them with destruction of property.

There is no need for a nebulous and poorly defined catch all charge that can be abused and weaponized.

 

[GamerGateSurvivor]

Do they just not warn police departments these days about blatant constitutional violations? The civil suits that inevitably issue from blatantly unconstitutional citations like this are very expensive to settle. That Shiloh lady up there in Minnesota is in line for a second windfall when she and her lawyer are done raping that joke of a court, for example.

I mean, this is old shit. It's been settled for a long time. Marsh v. Alabama (1946), Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940), Kunz v. New York (1951) and Hague v. C.I.O. (1939) all said in various ways and details "no faggots you can't punish preachers for preaching, dumb fucks, it's literally right there in the 1A." And SCOTUS has even slapped this shit back down in recent times; see Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi (2026).

I don't know what these uppity dumbasses are doing, but "thinking" is clearly not on the list of possibilities. Eating paste or sniffing glue, maybe.

The police don't care how expensive it is to clean up their messes because it's the taxpayers who foot the bill.

 

[Mister Fister]

Do they just not warn police departments these days about blatant constitutional violations? The civil suits that inevitably issue from blatantly unconstitutional citations like this are very expensive to settle. That Shiloh lady up there in Minnesota is in line for a second windfall when she and her lawyer are done raping that joke of a court, for example.

I mean, this is old shit. It's been settled for a long time. Marsh v. Alabama (1946), Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940), Kunz v. New York (1951) and Hague v. C.I.O. (1939) all said in various ways and details "no faggots you can't punish preachers for preaching, dumb fucks, it's literally right there in the 1A." And SCOTUS has even slapped this shit back down in recent times; see Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi (2026).

I don't know what these uppity dumbasses are doing, but "thinking" is clearly not on the list of possibilities. Eating paste or sniffing glue, maybe.

This is purely spite that someone blasphemed their progressive religion. They aren't thinking here of the long term destruction of the idea of the courts. This is the behavior of a state past the legitimacy point.

 

[Catch The Rainbow]

Not better, just "different" in a way that is "more".

having more responsibilities for the same reward is "more" somehow



'Here's your Mexican Border Defense Medal, María. And here's yours, José. And yours, Mateo. Your country thanks you for stopping the invasion of our southern border.'

 

[Pod 042]

10th Circuit decided a landmark case on quantum rape. If you, as a landlord, hire a mexican for maintenance work who has a transgender child, and that mexican eventually rapes a woman, have you as a landlord through transitive properties also raped the woman? The 10th Circuit holds that the answer is no, however the result might have been different if the woman had locked her door instead of leaving it unlocked.

https://www.ca10.uscourts.gov/sites/ca10/files/opinions/010111477282.pdf

For those who I know won't read the document and find useful's humorous explanation confusing.
>Landlord hired Mexican to do work on apartments
>Said Mexican then proceeded to rape a tenant
>Tenant sued both the rapist and landlord
>Rapist obviously because he raped her
>Landlord for hiring and sending the rapist
>Landlord found not liable

 

[Echinacea]

For those who I know won't read the document and find useful's humorous explanation confusing.
>Landlord hired Mexican to do work on apartments
>Said Mexican then proceeded to rape a tenant
>Tenant sued both the rapist and landlord
>Rapist obviously because he raped her
>Landlord for hiring and sending the rapist
>Landlord found not liable

for a case like this to be successful you'd have to prove the landlord knew the man was dangerous. this is negligence. surprised they'd use just hiring the guy as proof of that

 

[Mister Fister]

It's not about what's real it's about what can be proven and it can be really hard to prove negligence.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

for a case like this to be successful you'd have to prove the landlord knew the man was dangerous.

Not necessarily, hence my unlocked door door comment. One of the considerations the 10th has made was that the door was unlocked, and therefore the mexican did not have to use the master key to get in. If it had been locked, and he had used the master key, the landlord may have been liable because if not for the master key, the rape would not have happened.