US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

​

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/

 

[moocow]

It turns out the stupid pig faced cunt did. She cited him for "disurderly cunduct."

Do they just not warn police departments these days about blatant constitutional violations? The civil suits that inevitably issue from blatantly unconstitutional citations like this are very expensive to settle. That Shiloh lady up there in Minnesota is in line for a second windfall when she and her lawyer are done raping that joke of a court, for example.

I mean, this is old shit. It's been settled for a long time. Marsh v. Alabama (1946), Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940), Kunz v. New York (1951) and Hague v. C.I.O. (1939) all said in various ways and details "no faggots you can't punish preachers for preaching, dumb fucks, it's literally right there in the 1A." And SCOTUS has even slapped this shit back down in recent times; see Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi (2026).

I don't know what these uppity dumbasses are doing, but "thinking" is clearly not on the list of possibilities. Eating paste or sniffing glue, maybe.

 

[Keystone]

Do they just not warn police departments these days about blatant constitutional violations?

Yes but cops are power tripping faggots so that just gets ignored.

Female cop...gun drawn...hrrmhmhghh

 

[CarlKingofDucks]

Do they just not warn police departments these days about blatant constitutional violations? The civil suits that inevitably issue from blatantly unconstitutional citations like this are very expensive to settle. That Shiloh lady up there in Minnesota is in line for a second windfall when she and her lawyer are done raping that joke of a court, for example.

I mean, this is old shit. It's been settled for a long time. Marsh v. Alabama (1946), Cantwell v. Connecticut (1940), Kunz v. New York (1951) and Hague v. C.I.O. (1939) all said in various ways and details "no faggots you can't punish preachers for preaching, dumb fucks, it's literally right there in the 1A." And SCOTUS has even slapped this shit back down in recent times; see Olivier v. City of Brandon, Mississippi (2026).

I don't know what these uppity dumbasses are doing, but "thinking" is clearly not on the list of possibilities. Eating paste or sniffing glue, maybe.

Yes but have you considered a white female was unhappy with him and thus he was wrong?