Estás usando un navegador desactualizado. Es posible que no muestre este u otros sitios web correctamente. Deberías actualizar o usar un navegador alternativo.
🤡 GoonclownSteven Bonnell II / Destiny / Destiny.gg - Emotionally Unstable Manchild, Creeps on Teenagers, Incest Supporter, Degenerate Foot Sniffer, Cum Felcher, Gooner
Want to keep track of this thread?
Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading. Create account
ATTENTION
Special rules for the Destiny thread.
Don't engage footsoldiers. Whiteknights do not need 100 responses to every bait post; exercise restraint. Do not give attention to people who join and bomb the thread with negative reactions.
Don't write open letters to Destiny. It is very annoying attention seeking behavior. Just write normal posts.
Doe v. Bonnell
1:25-cv-20757— District Court, S.D. Florida
Docket No.
1:25-cv-20757
Court
District Court, S.D. Florida
Filed
17 de Feb, 2025
Nature of Suit
440 Civil Rights: Other
Cause
28:1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Jurisdiction
Federal Question
Jury Demand
Defendant
Last Filing
29 de Jun, 2026
Parties (2)
Parties
Steven Bonnell, II, Jane Doe
Recent Filings
(showing 5 of 367)
#
Date
Description
Filing
280
29 de Jun, 2026
PAPERLESS ORDER SETTING HEARING. A hearing on Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Under Seal and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions under FRCP 37(e)(2) for Defendant's Spoliation of Evidence, ECF Nos. 251, 262 is hereby SET before the undersigned on Wednesday, July 29, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. Courthouse, Courtroom 11-4, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida 33128. Given that the Motions pertain to evidence central to the resolution of Plaintiff's claims, this matter is hereby removed from its current trial calendar and shall be reset after the Court's ruling. Signed by Judge Jacqueline Becerra (drn) (Entered: 06/30/2026)
—
29 de Jun, 2026
—
29 de Jun, 2026
SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 279 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (2213918)
—
29 de Jun, 2026
—
29 de Jun, 2026
SYSTEM ENTRY - Docket Entry 281 [misc] restricted/sealed until further notice. (766837)
Honestly? Forget Destiny and Lauren Southern, or Destiny and George. Destiny and Britt are my one true pairing. Two sexually traumatized pieces of white trash who bonded over the fact they both played Final Fantasy 7 as children and saw too much of themselves in the main characters. If their sexting didn't include some Cloud/Aerith roleplay I'll be sorely disappointed.
Hey fuck you, man. Don't give up on George, he hasn't even had a chance to defend himself. We haven't seen those DMs. He might have talked to Destiny about FF7 all the time. I'm not willing to give up on them yet.
Also, the appropriate thing would be for them to role-play as Cloud and Yuffie since she's only 16.
George, get in here and defend your honor, you coward. Did you guys stay up to all hours of the night chatting away about the ethics of fucking a moogle? We need to know.
Perhaps one of the only people I DONT want to see chiming in on Destiny sex scandals, it has nothing to do with you and you're as bad with women and consent, baldie. Go farm clout somewhere else!
JSTLK had a whole thing with Lav and Mrow the other day talking about how he has to move on because he was blackmailed by Dan. I guess Chaeiry basically just wants to move on. JSTLK says that they don't really have anything on him, but it would be harmful to Chaeiry.
Meanwhile, they're leaving things like this on stream:
Which has led to the more popular DGG deepthroaters posting things like this:
As well as as Dan making comments about how JSTLK should talk to him anyway because he promises not to bring up "Sloppy Seconds." The interesting thing is that Dan said that to Mouton, whose wife is Sloppy Seconds to ol' Steve. Very awkward.
So I guess I'm wondering why JSTLK is backing down when he knows these people aren't going to let it go?
Damn, all this just because Destiny's is upset that Chaeiry called him out for 15/2.
As well as as Dan making comments about how JSTLK should talk to him anyway because he promises not to bring up "Sloppy Seconds." The interesting thing is that Dan said that to Mouton, whose wife is Sloppy Seconds to ol' Steve. Very awkward.
Mouton's wife also ran a spicy Patreon page where she posted several pictures of her feet. And she experimented with a little ageplay of her own as well.
Mouton's wife also ran a spicy Patreon page where she posted several pictures of her feet. And she experimented with a little ageplay of her own as well.
Oh, so the moratorium, or him "trying" not to talk about chaeiry, only lasted until chaeiry clarified that jstlk didn't rape her. He's such a nice guy.
A few days ago Dooby posted the logs of Destiny promoting a NSFW tag on Twitter for underage people in DGG chat, when he also linked the NSFW profile of a 15-year-old. He then promoted the hash tag on his stream and spent enough time on it to see "a whoooole bunch bunch of [minors] posting sex shit." He then went on the NoJumper podcast to clarify that the sex shit was "underage people posting porn [...] if you clicked [the hash tag] it was a ton of girls - like 15-16[-year-olds] - some of them just posting full-on fucking porn."
Anyways, Destiny decided to respond, and his defense for looking up what sounds like a good amount of CSAM as well as linking a NSFW profile of a 15-year-old, was that he was "incredulous." It was such a harrowing experience to see a "whoooole bunch" of CSAM that he went straight to his support group (DGG chat) and exposed them to it so they could relate. Destiny was so scarred by this experience that 3 months later he started jacking off to a 17-year-old as exposure therapy. https://x.com/TheOmniLiberal/status/2059650364027093083 (archive)
Some of the attacks levied at Dooby reminded me of how Destiny handled a 12-year-old girl in his own community years back:
3:20
- The girl was pretending she was 12 years old, but they didn't know so they couldn't ban her. Plausible deniability, Destiny's favorite.
- A couple DGGers goaded her into doing a stream for them. Some guys in his community were basically grooming her. She and some of the guys got banned, but...
- "Originally my main mod banned her, and then I think I unbanned her because it just seemed weird to ban somebody just because they were a 12-year-old girl [...] we went back and forth on this for a while [...] ultimately, because of just weird shit that was happening *laughs* we decided to ban her."
- It went so far that they got her to release a video where she was moaning for these freaks.
- Other: "I saw comments where they were like 'You better do this within a few minutes, you better stream for us, or else.' Did you ban the people that were making the demands, grooming her?" Destiny: "Uhm..most of them. I don't know if I banned those people." (emphasis mine)
Edit:
Chaeiry made a new tweet talking about how the fake jstlk-raped-chaeiry allegation has been "one of the most disgusting ways I have been antagonized over the last 18 months" and is imploring Destiny and his goons (MrMouton, I'm looking at you and your overlay) to leave her alone. The tweet was deleted shortly after.
The chaeiry rape stuff is wild because it's just a deflection of epstiny actually raping her by deception.
It is funny how jstlks horniness for chaeiry has put him into such a pickle. He really should have learned from epstiny's downfall to not mess around with bdp egirls. Like he totally mogged epstiny by stealing his girl, having her praise his sexual prowess (basically the opposite of 15:2) and he can't even use it to humiliate destiny because she's too overwhelmed to publicly fight back against her actual rapist.
My phone isnt loading the archives but look at one of Britt's substacks:
She is prone to using fairytales and other stories as representations for her life. My fellow tinfoil hat wearers will be familiar with project monarch and their programming with Alice in Wonderland, Wizard of Oz, and Disney Princesses. Britt was in the military and sexually abused by the sounds of it - but perhaps it was systemic and intentional.
It also appears britt is into gematria, which is reserved for only the most sane individuals. I have relegated such calculations to AI because it should suffer having to process this bullshit.
The following is greatly interpretive.
Her substack britt70x7 is a gematria format which can mean forgiveness.
8888 - god substitution
Dunno why extra 8. In angel numbers it just meant more and more prosperity but those interpretations all mean shit like that.
It's clear the THEO (similar to her ex-husbands handle on twitter, deus) meaning God would symbolize something like Jesus, but modified.
1121 - emotional dependency
in angel numbers, transformations and partnerships with divine support.
In gematria
Who baphomet and why we invokin
Oh funny, that's what britt's looney course aims for
0117 - gaslighting
In the beginning is love, God in the midst of his people.
Britt's course outline
I also tried angel numbers because the added 0 here seemed useless.
The angel numbers, 0 was the difference between self-reliance and divine assistance
I want @GarlicFragment to rest. Maybe they can add or correct what I missed.
She filed spoliation claims too late
Pxie's team did ask for tiny's devices but were shut down because tiny said they had insufficient evidence to say he tampered with anything.
Discord exports, logs, media file logs, g-drive links all provided... what do g-drive links matter if he deleted the content?
It really seems they're using the term "links" as a surrogate for what the links led to. Pxie's filing says they received 0 actual media.
Saying pxie was delayed because she's bad but tiny waited so patiently.
Saying pxie waited to hear tiny's deposition in hopes he slipped up and confessed to spoliation, thus why spoliation claim filed after
Oh wow, those 3 criteria
1. Specific electronically stored info that should have been preserved in anticipation or conduct of litigation was lost because a party failed to take reasonable steps to preserve it
2. That info cant be replaced or restored through additional discovery
3. Acted with intent to deprive plaintiff
They're saying she can't identify what was destroyed.
Although content was deleted from public view, relevant Discord communications were archived.
No stalker child, it is YOU who spoliate!
DeLaQuna mentioned
"and if I didn't provide it, it was a mistake!"
They're saying his preservation methods do not exceed mere negligence, so can't be considered spoliation.
I can sense they're fluffing us for when it's revealed that something is actually missing
Pxie told him to DFE so she can't call that spoliation
Claims pxie's team using AI, again
Claims the G-drive links pxie's team wanted were provided and didn't even direct to pxie's video.
they can't agree on dates, they're moving goalposts, the video was never sent
It's that damned kiwifarms
Tiny trying to recoup some of his 800k
Eta my takeaway: tiny's strategy is to say he benevolently did as she asked when she asked and deleted pxie's videos, any links he sent weren't of pxie and we just have to take his word for it cause the links are dead. Unless the content of those links are discoverable by Google... that's that.
Well isn't that lovely. Threatening to weaponize the legal system against someone who is essentially reporting on an unlikeable public figure's court case and unraveling life.
