US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
he was the last non owned president
1779649870023.png

only one who refused to kiss the wall
Carter never visited the Western Wall and Biden never visited it while president.

JFK never "refused to kiss the wall" because the Israelis didn't have control of the Wall until 1967.

That being said, we knew his opinions:


Three weeks ago, I said in a public statement Israel is here to stay. The next day I was attacked by the Cairo radio rebuking me for my faith in Israel and quoting this criticism from Arabic newspaper Al-Gomhouria:

"As for the question of the existence and nonexistence of Israel," the paper says, "Mr. Kennedy says that Israel has been created in order to exist. And we say that Israel will not continue to exist. Time will judge between us, Mr. Kennedy."
I agree. Time will judge between us whether Israel will continue to exist or not.

But I wish I could be as sure of my prophecy about this November as I am about my prophecy on this occasion.

It is worth remembering at this meeting that the cause of Israel stands beyond Jewish life. In our pluralistic society, as Bob Wagner pointed out, it has not been merely a Jewish cause, any more than Irish independence was the cause merely of those of Irish descent, because wherever freedom exists, there we are all committed. And wherever it is endangered, there we are all endangered.

The ideals of Zionism have, in the last half century, been endorsed by both parties, and by Americans of all ranks in all sections. Friendship for Israel is not a partisan matter. It is a national commitment.

Yet within this national obligation of friendship, there is a special obligation on the party of which I am a member. It was President Woodrow Wilson who prophesied with great wisdom a Jewish homeland. It was President Franklin Roosevelt who kept alive the hope of Jewish redemption in the days of the Nazi terror. It was President Harry Truman who first – my friend Harry Truman – who first recognized (I have only been able to say that since last Saturday, but I'm saying it), who first recognized the status of Israel in world affairs.
We are in this country the youngest of people. But we are the oldest of republics. Now is our chance in this country to extend the hand of friendship to the oldest of People and the youngest of republics.
 
Im talking about LITERATELY one of the most important parts of US politics and you guys are pissing your pants that you cant silence me, holy fuck just use the ignore button, you people are secret communists that like to silence all dissenting opinions, SAD.

Crazy how all these lone wolf shooters keep advancing the Levants agenda
Ver archivo adjunto 9052940

thats 2 entire space stations just FYI, your and my tax dollars
Ver archivo adjunto 9052943

this is very relevent and I think a sign of the times that so few want to even have a discussions and only want to silence ideas that scare them
Muh US gives 3 billion to Israel per year it means they killed Charlie. I'm so smart.
 
Muh US gives 3 billion to Israel per year it means they killed Charlie. I'm so smart.
I could be wrong man, just my opinion. Dont want to cause a pant pissing fit in the thread, Ill drop it for now, just wanted to share my 2 cents on this in the wake of the most recent "shooting"

sounds like trump is pumping the breaks on the idea of an immediate deal
1779650861591.png
Source

Cant make heads or tails of what the Dons plans are over there, we are closing on 100 days of this special military operation and its just so up in the air where this will all go, thoughts?
 
this is very relevent and I think a sign of the times that so few want to even have a discussions and only want to silence ideas that scare them
The discussions you want to have are about baseless conspiracy theories that you advance without proof, where the evidence is usually something that you drunkenly misunderstood and then presumed to be established fact

It becomes morally imperative to silence ideas when they're vapid and incoherent obstructing rational discourse

We don't gain anything from entertaining the ramblings of schizophrenics, we'd actually be better off if they were shut the fuck up, because their nonsense takes more effort to dispel than it takes them to babble forth
 
I could be wrong man, just my opinion. Dont want to cause a pant pissing fit in the thread, Ill drop it for now, just wanted to share my 2 cents on this in the wake of the most recent "shooting"

sounds like trump is pumping the breaks on the idea of an immediate deal
Ver archivo adjunto 9052974
Source

Cant make heads or tails of what the Dons plans are over there, we are closing on 100 days of this special military operation and its just so up in the air where this will all go, thoughts?
Oh no Trump tells his faggot staffers to not talk to faggot journalists? Whatever shall I do?
 
Última edición:
The discussions you want to have are about baseless conspiracy theories that you advance without proof, where the evidence is usually something that you drunkenly misunderstood and then presumed to be established fact

It becomes morally imperative to silence ideas when they're vapid and incoherent obstructing rational discourse

We don't gain anything from entertaining the ramblings of schizophrenics, we'd actually be better off if they were shut the fuck up, because their nonsense takes more effort to dispel than it takes them to babble forth
if my rantings were as incoherent as you claim them to be then you would just walk by them without paying a second thought, do you feel the need to call the cops on some homeless guy sitting in a gutter ranting about the aliens that got him? Unless your a deeply disturbed individual I doubt it.

I know what im speaking to is very sensitive to some people and so they would rather claim im "causing a problem" by suggesting the things I am talking about are "taking to much effort to dispell" rather than engage with them legitimately
1779651603388.png

those were some nice big words there though 1st amendment hater
 
if my rantings were as incoherent as you claim them to be then you would just walk by them without paying a second thought, do you feel the need to call the cops on some homeless guy sitting in a gutter ranting about the aliens that got him? Unless your a deeply disturbed individual I doubt it.

I know what im speaking to is very sensitive to some people and so they would rather claim im "causing a problem" by suggesting the things I am talking about are "taking to much effort to dispell" rather than engage with them legitimately
Ver archivo adjunto 9053013

those were some nice big words there though 1st amendment hater
You can literally make a thread for your schizo rantings rather than shit up this one.
 
this is the whole point of issue my friend, im not saying he dosent have the rifle in the bag, im saying because of the size of the rifle it would need to be broken down to fit into any bag that isent a specific gun case and you know how long those things are

just the fact it can "flap around" is not helpful to your argument as clearly the rifle has to be on him as its not recovered on the roof but it takes more time than he had to have broken down that rifle

You startting to get where im coming from, we do agree he has it in his bag, im just saying "its insnane they want us to belive he had to time to dissemble it" much less resemble it in the woods

BTW they found one of the spent rounds IN THE RIFLE, so that means he had to broken down the rifle with the round still in the chamber or somehow or some reason put the spent casing BACK IN when he reassembled it lated

also Im pretty sure you found bigfoot
Ver archivo adjunto 9052758
Holy fucking shit, dude, you don't know shit about firearms and need to stop attempting to contribute on that topic.

BTW they found one of the spent rounds IN THE RIFLE, so that means he had to broken down the rifle with the round still in the chamber or somehow or some reason put the spent casing BACK IN when he reassembled it lated

Loading and firing process for firing a single shot from any bolt action rifle with a fixed magazine:
  1. Open the bolt
  2. Place 1-5 rounds in the fixed magazine
  3. Close the bolt, chambering the first round
  4. Pull the trigger, discharging the round
  5. (optional) open the bolt extracting the fired casing
If the troon fucker fired a single shot and then immediately ran away, where exactly do you think the fired casing would be other than in the chamber?

The rifle in question one of millions of sporterized, surplus Mausers that was probably sold from a magazine ad some time in the 50-80s. This is peepaw's durr rifle from central casting. The .30-06s have been cut down and rechambred or rebarreled and the wooden stocks replaced with generic nylon fiberglass or some "custom" hardwood. Many of the sporterized rifles are fastened into their "upgraded" stock with a single screw. It would be trivial to assemble the action to the stock in 30 seconds or less with a few hours of practice.

A German issue Mauser could be 48 inches long, a sporterized, rechambered, Fudd special is both lighter and probably some degree shorter, because it is configured for hunting deer, innawoods, not to stop a horse 600 yards away with a single shot.

You also don't understand the reality of commercial spec .30-06 frequently being downloaded to be "Garand safe."

And even if it weren't downloaded, the observed wound profile from the videos is well within the range of what I have seen butchering dozens deer and elk taken with .30-06 and even hotter loads.
 
The discussions you want to have are about baseless conspiracy theories that you advance without proof, where the evidence is usually something that you drunkenly misunderstood and then presumed to be established fact

It becomes morally imperative to silence ideas when they're vapid and incoherent obstructing rational discourse

We don't gain anything from entertaining the ramblings of schizophrenics, we'd actually be better off if they were shut the fuck up, because their nonsense takes more effort to dispel than it takes them to babble forth

Listen man, you don't understand, leftist radicalized by the media is just too unbelievable. That's already happened, Mossad doesn't repeat their hits like that, I should know I have extremely Anti-jewop brain chemistry.

Just look at the facts, the 30.06 was designed in 1903 for the Springfield rifle to penetrate German tank armor. On a human target, it doesn't even leave atoms behind. It ricocheted off his soft plate body armor under his T shirt that was molded exactly like a human torso. Then Egyptian Helicopters used laser to cauterized the wound at moment of impact so that the entire audience wasn't sprayed in a tsunami of blood like in Evil Dead. As Charlie died, he shed a single tear thinking about the White children he should of had with good Christian woman, Candice Owens and not the Demon Erika Kirk. Jesus Christ blessed this moment by putting an imagine of his face on the concrete, which Jewish Freemasons had to immediately destroy. And finally, at Charlie's Funeral I personally saw JD Vance fingerblasting her at the podium and wiped his hands on her face to fake tears.

And how many points did I bring up? SIX. SIX POINTS.

I rest your case.

That was fun, if I thought Studs was just shit posting and didn't believe the shit he was saying, I wouldn't be mad at him
 
if my rantings were as incoherent as you claim them to be then you would just walk by them without paying a second thought, do you feel the need to call the cops on some homeless guy sitting in a gutter ranting about the aliens that got him? Unless your a deeply disturbed individual I doubt it.

I know what im speaking to is very sensitive to some people and so they would rather claim im "causing a problem" by suggesting the things I am talking about are "taking to much effort to dispell" rather than engage with them legitimately
Ver archivo adjunto 9053013

those were some nice big words there though 1st amendment hater
Drunk again eh?
 
The outdated goycattle are desperate to introduce the new shabbos goys down everyone's throat, im getting sick of all the india shilling by politicians i must refrain from fed post.
Jeets are the new niggers/spics. Politicians will try to protect their precious cattle, but its too late, jeet fatigue has already imposed itself.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo