US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
I find his posts funny but for whatever reason every time he uses a plural first-person pronoun like "we" or "us" it irks the hell out of me, so I think Null should write a script to replace every use with its singular equivalent.

"The far left have won forever. We I will be raped thoroughly by third-world race communists"
It's the royal "we". I think fatpacks might be the Pope shitposting on KF and sharing his sexual fetish of being subjugatied and raped by lesser brown pegans.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 8790176

L / A

"The only two good justices must immediately retire so that Democrats don't replace them." - Walsh

If one accepts Walsh's premise, one must also accept that they'd just be replaced with two cucks nowhere near as good as them, since the new nominees will need to get through the approval gauntlet; nobody like a Thomas or an Alito is doing that in 2026. The Supreme Court is a poisoned and dying institution like every other one in our politics.
I don't believe you will find someone as sufficiently right-wing as Clarence anymore. The issue isn't finding some shallow based nigger, it's that Clarence is very rigorous and logical in his arguments. He's sided with consumer rights and free speech arguments ("liberal" standpoints) in the past because they were reasonable. Good luck finding that in today's climate, especially with every second judge being a political activist.
 
I don't believe you will find someone as sufficiently right-wing as Clarence anymore. The issue isn't finding some shallow based nigger, it's that Clarence is very rigorous and logical in his arguments. He's sided with consumer rights and free speech arguments ("liberal" standpoints) in the past because they were reasonable. Good luck finding that in today's climate, especially with every second judge being a political activist.
This isn’t the problem you think it is. Thomas has a full set of clerks who could replace him and maintain his philosophy for years. The problem is getting one through the Senate struggle sessions.
 
That is an option, but not one that any American is going to go through with. I can envision that many third worlders will gladly use it against us though.
So you don't believe in legal or political solutions. You think violence is an option but don't think Americans will do it (so you don't think it's an option after all lol). So you have no solution to the problem.

Are you just trying to doom troll to get people to be disillusioned with solutions so the other side can win? Genuine question.
 
The fate of the Republic lies in the hands of a middle aged woman whose Church promotes mass immigration and who has personally adopted minorities from third world countries.
We already lost.

We might as well just let President Newsom send us to the FEMA camps already.
 
Justice KBJ: "If I steal a wallet in Japan, I am subject to Japanese laws….. in a sense, it's allegiance."

Her case for birthright citizenship:
1.mp4
I tuned into the oral arguments late. What the fuck is Justice Jackson going on about, saying that when she's in Japan, she has allegiance to Japan? Does she even know what the word means?

I'm wounded sir
It's okay, we already knew you were weird.

What would be the environmental downsides to nuking Canada? As far as I see it, you’d have a few radiation hotspots followed by the largest expanses of prime lumber and drinking water as far as the eye can see. If the bombs somehow cause localized climate change by heating up the northern expanse, that’s just more arid land to cultivate. As far as I can tell, the only downsides are political.
The biggest danger is if any Canadians are not immediately and completely incinerated by the blast, they might survive long enough to become radioactive mutants. The US does not need roving bands of radioactive mutants performing raids across the northern border.
 
Justice KBJ: "If I steal a wallet in Japan, I am subject to Japanese laws….. in a sense, it's allegiance."
Is this even correct? Sometimes the country will prosecute you for a crime, sometimes they will send you back home if they're confident your nation of origin will prosecute you effectively. I know on average local courts will prosecute for crimes committed in the country they're located on, but there's too many exceptions to use this as a basis.
 
The argument basically boils down to "they clearly only meant slaves when they wrote this and had no idea the fraud that would be possible almost 200 years from then so they wrote it kinda loosely, but this helps the Democrats steal votes, so we'll allow it."
 
So you don't believe in legal or political solutions. You think violence is an option but don't think Americans will do it (so you don't think it's an option after all lol). So you have no solution to the problem.

Are you just trying to doom troll to get people to be disillusioned with solutions so the other side can win? Genuine question.
He’s an overly committed gimmick poster. But he’s actually kinda useful for drawing out doomers and paid jeet demoralization shills, since they all positively react to his posts and reply to him like “yeah saar keep telling it like it is”
 
Atrás
Top Abajo