US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Again I ask you, if you believe that political or legal means through the courts can no longer fix this country. What is your alternative solution. We all just do mass suicide since it all doomed? We resort to violence? What alternative outlook are you offering here.
Fatpack justs posting for meme but, everyone knows common answer.
You just stuck on last one which is spaaaaace but that won't happen 100 of years.
 
That is an option, but not one that any American is going to go through with. I can envision many third worlders who gladly will use it against us though.
Or you know just make rulez that doesn't supplanted our court to be ruled by UK/EU/European Union
Or globalist non us governments which where we are heading.
 
The anchor babies of illegals usually hate America more than their parents because they feel like strangers in a country they have no cultural ties to.
And SCOTUS is going to give them free reign to occupy the country and subvert it as much as they want.

this is how Spicolas Fuentes talks: accelerationism. we need to burn everything down and cut ourselves down completely, that'll solve it. not like it would completely and utterly entrench our enemies.
Would it really matter anymore after the birthright citizenship case? Our enemies already decisively won and everything we have done to fight back was for nothing.
 
this is how Spicolas Fuentes talks: accelerationism. we need to burn everything down and cut ourselves down completely, that'll solve it. not like it would completely and utterly entrench our enemies.
If COVID didn't radicalize Americans into a civil war the slow boil of a browning wouldn't either
 
My favorite thing about these people who cry about JD Vance being married to an ethnic Indian girl is the fact that they leave out that Usha was born and raised in San Diego.
Just admit that you're a pretend ass racist and you're jealous that a man married the love of his life regardless of her skin colour.
Vance should be properly shit on for being best friends with Vivek Ramaswamy, known streetshitter and confirmed scammer.
 
If COVID didn't radicalize Americans into a civil war the slow boil of a browning wouldn't either
It didn't push us into a civil war, no. It did however wake a lot of fucking people up when in their own lifetime they saw the dems back and fourth the same arguments used for and against them again and again. The fact we're even discussing this shit on a country wide scale is not something we'd have ever gotten to the point of doing just a few years ago.
 
If BRC gets removed, fatpacks username should just be replaced with a burger emoji
I find his posts funny but for whatever reason every time he uses a plural first-person pronoun like "we" or "us" it irks the hell out of me, so I think Null should write a script to replace every use with its singular equivalent.

"The far left have won forever. We I will be raped thoroughly by third-world race communists"
 
Can't edit oh well but the argument about subject to jurisdiction seems to be an extremely difficult case to make and might lead to wild outcomes. Hypothetically if that argument is found viable and scotus rules for Trump, I can see the admin saying pro Palestinian protesters lack a loyalty to the US and therefore lose their citizenship.
This AFAIK is specifically about birthright citizenship for non-citizens and illegals. It would have nothing to do with naturalized citizenship or citizenship by blood. Americans with 100 years of ancestry here should have absolutely no fears about this change affecting them.

I do not see any avenue for ripping away citizenship in some 1984 fashion, except maybe in the case of naturalized citizens who were found to have applied for citizenship fraudulently (lied about not being a shit stirrer or terrorist, and then becoming one on american soil, they can already do this btw), which could possibly be allowed for any minors born under this fraudulent application to lose their citizenship as the family is deported back to where they came from, but that would be a consequence of this change rather than the primary target. Though I think this scenario might require that these children born to parents essentially on parole have a different designation of citizenry than the default American one.
 
I guess I just don't see how this is practical thinking with the argument the admin is making so far. If being a subject of a ruler is what subject of references as you put it, how is this possibly determined? Are people who follow the laws subjects of the ruler (the us constitution)? If not, how would you determine the subject loyalty of someone?

The problem I'm having is finding a practical way to apply this to potentially millions of people and then what to do with them.
If you're talking about existing children of temporary residents that have already been granted citizenship, they wouldn't be instantly denaturalized by the ruling if it comes down the way it should. Denaturalization would potentially be an individual process though, since technically their citizenship would have been acquired through illegitimate means. So some screaming torta who is protesting ICE by waving a Mexican flag might just learn to celebrate Mexico properly.
 
This wouldnt even need to go to the Supreme Court of Congress just got off their ass and did their job to pass a law to patch an obvious loophole that makes 0 sense. Just make citizenship status inherited from the parents, problem solved. This shouldn't even be a debate if we weren't dealing with utter retards.
 
Ver archivo adjunto 8790176

L / A

"The only two good justices must immediately retire so that Democrats don't replace them." - Walsh

If one accepts Walsh's premise, one must also accept that they'd just be replaced with two cucks nowhere near as good as them, since the new nominees will need to get through the approval gauntlet; nobody like a Thomas or an Alito is doing that in 2026. The Supreme Court is a poisoned and dying institution like every other one in our politics.
It’s obvious Thomas intends to stay on the bench for life.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo