US US Politics General 2: Hope Edition - Discussion of President Trump and other politicians

General Trump Banner.png

Should be a wild four years.

Helpful links for those who need them:

Current members of the House of Representatives
https://www.house.gov/representatives

Current members of the Senate
https://www.senate.gov/senators/

Current members of the US Supreme Court
https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/biographies.aspx

Members of the Trump Administration
https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/
 
Última edición por un moderador:
Última edición por un moderador:
Elise Stefanik not running for Governor or Congress. This one doesn't feel like because of worry of that magic blue wave, more likely she is going to come into the administration in some role (possibly Bongino's). She does seem to have utility compared to others close to Trump.

Ver archivo adjunto 8306221
That sucks for NYS though. Hopefully this is a fake out and she's not dropping out of politics altogether.
 
Trump, you have to Invade Venezuela Now, that is the only way you can come out ahead of this PR nightmare rape. There are literally no other options
I don't think there is anything that can change people's minds about Trump if they're already hyper defensive of him. There could be a picture of him kissing a 12 yr old girl in these files with Epstein giving the Thumbs up in the background and I swear to fucking GOD there would be no shortage of people in this thread saying "What, that's perfectly normal for a man of his stature and station. You're just a libtard who's been told this is bad because Orange man..."
 
Litterally every single president before and after him has done far worse.
Nixon gets vilified because he may have helped to cover for someone who got caught spying on a meeting of Democrats. Obama is idolized despite expanding the NSA to the point where they spy on every phone call, text message, and email made by any US citizen. It's all so tiresome.
 
I don't think there is anything that can change people's minds about Trump if they're already hyper defensive of him. There could be a picture of him kissing a 12 yr old girl in these files with Epstein giving the Thumbs up in the background and I swear to fucking GOD there would be no shortage of people in this thread saying "What, that's perfectly normal for a man of his stature and station. You're just a libtard who's been told this is bad because Orange man..."
You're right honestly. When I read that excerpt @babyDunk quoted, I thought how a smile and nod is a very noncommittal gesture. It could be a "christ what is wrong with this guy, when will he go away" type thing. Or it could be a "this is back when we are still tight and I agree that this 14 year old girl will be good rapin" type thing. When did this happen?
 
"Democracy died today"

Liberal fails to hold back tears as he sees Trump's name installed on the Kennedy Center….

1.mp4
I really wanna call this guy a faggot.

also where were this faggots when we started talking down statues of historical figures because they were white, slave, owning men.
 
Cmon duuude, thats a bit more than 'weird'.'Weird' is the way someone coping would put it.
It's pretty sus, not gonna lie. I still don't think he himself did anything, but i am slowly making peace with the relization that there's a non zero possibility he might've known about all of it and didn't say anything until epstein crossed him business wise and started trying to recruit girls from mar a lago (which would've gotten trump in deep shit)
 
You're right honestly. When I read that excerpt @babyDunk quoted, I thought how a smile and nod is a very noncommittal gesture. It could be a "christ what is wrong with this guy, when will he go away" type thing. Or it could be a "this is back when we are still tight and I agree that this 14 year old girl will be good rapin" type thing. When did this happen?
that was my first thought but i know the second i post that shit some retarded faggot is going to accuse me of loving trump so much i'd ignore pedo shit. the problem is, what they describe could be anywhere between 'haha yeah whatever jeffy, oh look diet cokes' to 'oh yeah that's a real hot piece of underage ass, jeffy. good find.'

the fact that it's such a vague description, no other info at all, no context, indicates to me that something has been intentionally left out so as to create doubt in a reasonable person's mind... which is the goal of criminal trials, after all. if you sew the doubt into the jury pool (the populace of america in this case) you can avoid a lot of potential questions about bias in any future legal proceedings... if they intend to go that way, of course.

it just seems to me like more of the 'we censored virginia's name here in the hopes that we can sucker a few retarded boomers into not understanding this is long-debunked bullshit' that it was always going to be. this whole fucking mess had to be solved 20 years ago. if a picture of trump involved in any of this shit beyond being at some extremely public gathering with epstein at some stupid party in the 90s, i will be against him in a heartbeat, but from what i can see there just doesn't appear to be any actual evidence beyond 'yeah but they EXISTED in the same ROOM sometimes.'
 
it just seems to me like more of the 'we censored virginia's name here in the hopes that we can sucker a few retarded boomers into not understanding this is long-debunked bullshit' that it was always going to be. this whole fucking mess had to be solved 20 years ago. if a picture of trump involved in any of this shit beyond being at some extremely public gathering with epstein at some stupid party in the 90s, i will be against him in a heartbeat, but from what i can see there just doesn't appear to be any actual evidence beyond 'yeah but they EXISTED in the same ROOM sometimes.'
I mean, just last month they tried that with the emails remember?

Where it basically was a confession that they couldn't get anything on him, even after going to Bannon. Along with trying to censor out Virginia's name again.
 
Atrás
Top Abajo