I know this will be VERY unpopular. Look Charlie Kirk was not a member of the government, yet we're providing him all the honors that someone in government would get if they got assassinated. In many ways this is the same sort of thing like how the left did what George Floyd. Look you could agree with everything Charlie Kirk said, but the man does not deserve to have a flag flown in half mast when that's something that only happens when there's undeniably a national tragedy, or someone in the government dies. Charlie Kirk was a political figure and one not elected by the people. The Democrats don't agree with him and the Republicans like him. So you have half of the country that doesn't like him. Yet people are attacking people for not putting a flag at half mast or flagellating themselves over his death. I mean Christ, the thing that the Indian that runs the FBI said was over the fucking top and the man's corpse was transported on air force 2. At this point why don't we just put him on the fucking 20?
Look I understand this fear and the concern for people who promote and are giddy about this man's assassination, it's not right to promote the death of others because you simply disagree of their political view, especially when your political opposition was doing no more than just speaking. But this reaction is a little over time. We all have to say that. The man was not a prophet. He was a normal man who had a political and social viewpoint that he was promoting.
You cannot allow this man's assassination to turn into the rights' version of George Floyd.
